Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorThe Second Hospital of Shandong University
About this trial
To compare the safety/efficacy of the robotic-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (RAL/S) with the video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection.
Video-assisted lobectomy/segmentectomy (VAL/S) for lung resection is divided into uniport group and multiple- port group.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
good cardio- pulmonary function to tolerate surgery;
minimaly invasive surgery for lobectomy or segmentectomy or sleeve lobectomy;
Disqualifiers
cardio- pulmonary function is not good enough to tolerate surgery;
huge tumor or extensive adhesion in thoracic cavity.
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- robotic surgery
- uniport surgery
- multiple- port surgery
Treatment groups
800 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov