About this trial
Different treatment options are available for massive or irreparable rotator cuff tears. An arthroscopic or an open repair approach is possible in the majority of cases and functional outcomes are improved, particularly when a complete arthroscopic repair can be achieved. However, the healing rate of massive rotator cuff tears after repair may remain low and failure of healing is associated with progression of arthritis. An alternative to arthroscopic or open repair is reverse shoulder arthroplasty which decreases pain and improves function, active shoulder elevation and quality of life. The primary goal of this prospective multicentric randomized study is to determine if there is a difference of functional outcomes between rotator cuff repair (RCR) repair and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA).
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
1 Patient voluntarily consents to participate
2 Patient with a massive and reparable non traumatic rotator cuff tears after failure of conservative treatment
3 Patients with the following pre-operative images: Three standardized X-rays series and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or arthro Magnetic Resonance Imaging without sign of traumatic lesions
Disqualifiers
1 Patient has known intentions, obligations, or co-morbidity that would inhibit them from participating in the study
2 Revision rotator cuff repair
3 Patient consent withdrawal
4 Glenohumeral arthritis defined as stage > 3 Hamada classification
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Arthroscopy
- Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty