Shoulder Impingement Syndrome and Graded Motor Imagery
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age20-50
SponsorNuray Alaca
About this trial
Graded motor imagery (GMI): used successfully in chronic, complex and painful clinical conditions accompanied by many pain and movement problems; It is a treatment, education and rehabilitation process that is based on recently obtained scientific data and current clinical studies, is individually adapted and approaches the individual holistically with a biopsychosocial model. Nowadays, it is frequently used in the treatment of some neurological diseases. In addition, these approaches are also used in the treatment of some orthopedic diseases including chronic pain. There are a limited number of studies in which the mentioned approaches are used together in stages, and the stages are mostly used alone. There is only one study in the literature on subacromial pain syndrome (SAS), which is the most common cause of shoulder pain and causes radiator cuff problems. Stage 2 SAS patients were included in the study and only one phase of GMI treatment was used in addition to the traditional physiotherapy program. Despite these positive results in favor of GMI, the fact that there is no study using the entire GMI treatment in SAS shows us that a randomized controlled and blinded study with high evidence value should be conducted on this subject. In addition, determining the effect of GMI on changes in central nervous system such as fear of pain, two-point discrimination, and left/right lateralization speed and accuracy task will help fill the literature gaps on this subject. In the light of this information, the question of planned master's thesis study is the effect of GMI treatment applied in addition to traditional physiotherapy in SAS on pain level, joint range of motion, functionality, pain-related fear, two-point discrimination and left/right lateralization speed and accuracy compared to only traditional physiotherapy. whether it is superior or not.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
20-50 years of age with complaints of shoulder pain in the anterio-lateral region lasting more than 6 weeks, with a positive Neer impingement test and/or a positive Hawkins-Kennedy test
Additionally, patients must have at least one of the symptoms listed. These symptoms are: painful arch on active shoulder elevation, pain with resisted shoulder external rotation in abduction at 90°, and a positive empty can test.
Disqualifiers
Having had a steroid injection into the shoulder within the last 3 months
Previous surgery on the neck, thoracic spine or shoulder
Red flags (e.g. tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, resting blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg, history of long-term steroid use)
History of shoulder dislocation, subluxation, fracture, adhesive capsulitis, frozen shoulder, or cervical or thoracic surgery
Trial design
Design model
Parallel
Treatments tested in this trial
Graded Motor Imagery
Other interventionThe three different treatment techniques include left/right discrimination training, explicit motor imagery exercises and mirror therapy. These techniques are delivered sequentially but require a flexible approach from the patient and clinician to move forwards, backward and sideways in the treatment process to suit the individual. With patience, persistence and often lots of hard work, GMI gives new hope for treatment outcomes.
Traditional Physiotherapy Program
Other interventionThis protocol included stretching and strengthening exercises
Treatment groups
30 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groupsGroup A: Traditional Physiotherapy ProgramActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: Traditional Physiotherapy Program and Graded Motor Imagery TherapyExperimental treatment 2 interventions
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
1
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11)
The Numerical Rating Scale (NPRS-11) is an 11-point scale for self-report of pain. It is the most commonly used unidimensional pain scale. The respondent selects a whole number (integers 0-10) that best reflects the intensity (or other quality if requested of his/her pain.0 point is the minimum and 10 point is the maximum. The higher the score, the more severe the pain.
Time frame
Change from baseline range of motion at 6th week2
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was developed to measure current shoulder pain and disability in an outpatient setting. The SPADI contains 13 items that assess two domains; a 5-item subscale that measures pain and an 8-item subscale that measures disability between 0 to 100, with a higher value indicating worse condition.
Time frame
Change from baseline score of The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at 6th week3
Global Rating of Change scale (Patient Satisfaction)
Patient satisfaction regarding improvement in shoulder function will be evaluated by the Global Rating of Change scale. All participants will be asked to rate their condition after a six-week intervention period compared to baseline by indicating whether they have improved significantly, improved slightly, unchanged, deteriorated slightly, or deteriorated significantly between -3 to +3, with a higher value indicating better condition in this study.
Time frame
Change from baseline Global Rating of Change scale at 6th week4
Central Sensitization Scale
Central Sensitization Scale, which can be applied in the presence of chronic pain, is used in central sensitization syndromes. It consists of two parts. Part A of the scale includes a Likert scale (0-4 points) that questions health-related symptoms. This section is scored from 0 to 100, with higher numbers being associated with a higher degree of central sensitization. Scores of 40 and above indicate the presence of central sensitization. In section B, it questions whether any of the central sensitization syndromes have been diagnosed before.
Time frame
Change from baseline score of Central Sensitization Scale scale at 6th weekSecondary outcomes
1
Range of motion
Shoulder range of motion is the capability of a joint to go through its complete spectrum of movements.
Time frame
Change from baseline range of motion at 6th week2
Pressure Pain Threshold
A digital pressure algometer will be applied to the web space of the foot opposite the trigger point. Participants are instructed to say "stop" or "pain" so the stimulus can be terminated "when the sensation first transitions from pressure to pain" (pain threshold).
Time frame
Change from baseline Pressure Pain Threshold at 6th week3
Pain Catastrophizing Scale
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a 13-item self-report measure designed to assess catastrophic thinking related to pain among adults with or without chronic pain.The person may score a total of 52 (Pain Catastrophizing Scale). A high score indicates a high level of catastrophic.
Time frame
Change from baseline score of Pain Catastrophizing Scale at 6th week4
Fear avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ)
Fear avoidance belief questionnaire FABQ) is a questionnaire based on the fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception. The FABQ measures patient's fear of pain and consequent avoidance of physical activity (PA) because of their fear.There is a maximum score of 96. A higher score indicates more strongly held fear avoidance beliefs. There are two subscales within the FABQ; the work subscale (FABQw) with 7 questions (maximum score of 42) and the physical activity subscale (FABQpa) with 4 questions (maximum score of 24)
Time frame
Change from baseline score of Fear avoidance belief questionnaire at 6th weekSponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Nuray Alaca
Lead sponsor
Acibadem University
Sponsor institution
Source ClinicalTrials.gov