About this trial
The goal of this observational, retrospective, multicenter cohort study is to evaluate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of sleeve lobectomy performed via minimally invasive (RATS/VATS) or open thoracotomy approaches in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have undergone neoadjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination regimens. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
* Does minimally invasive sleeve lobectomy result in comparable or improved perioperative and postoperative outcomes compared to open thoracotomy following neoadjuvant treatment in NSCLC? * Does surgical approach influence oncologic endpoints such as margin status, lymph node dissection, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival? This research addresses a critical gap in the thoracic oncology field by evaluating the safety, complexity, and efficacy of advanced surgical techniques in the context of evolving multimodal therapy paradigm. Findings may inform clinical decision-making and optimize patient selection in an era of increasing use of neoadjuvant strategies for resectable NSCLC.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Age ≥ 18 years
Histologically confirmed NSCLC
Undergoing sleeve lobectomy with curative intent
Receipt of neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, target therapy, etc.)
Disqualifiers
Sublobar resections (e.g., segmentectomy) or pneumonectomy
Absence of neoadjuvant therapy
Purely diagnostic surgical procedures
Incomplete medical records or lost to follow-up
Trial population
The study will involve multiple thoracic surgery centers with experience in advanced surgical techniques for lung cancer, including sleeve resections and neoadjuvant management. Each center will contribute anonymized data from eligible cases, in accordance with local ethical approvals and data protection regulations.
Trial design
Cohort
Retrospective
Treatments tested in this trial
Not listed
Trial groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
3-year RFS
In this study, the investigators will focus on the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the participants between the two groups (open vs. MIS) for the comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes, as the primary outcome.
Secondary outcomes
3-year OS
The investigators will also focus on the 3-year overall survival (OS) of the participants between the two groups (open vs. MIS) for the comparison of the long-term oncologic outcomes, as the secondary outcome.
Other outcomes
Intraoperative bleeding
The intraoperative bleeding will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in milliliter (mL).
Surgery duration
The surgery duration will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in minute (min).
Postoperative hospital stay
The postoperative hospital stay will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, measured in day.
Postoperative complications
The postoperative complications will be investigated between open versus MIS sleeve lobectomy as one of the perioperative outcomes, showed in the number of the participants who occurred postoperative complications (n).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
Shanghai Chest Hospital
Lead sponsor
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Collaborator
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Collaborator
University of Padova
Collaborator