Soft Tissue Release for Elbow Pronation in Cerebral Palsy

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age6-16
SponsorIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa

About this trial

Upper extremity deformities are highly common in individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) as a result of motor control impairment and muscle imbalance. Among these deformities, elbow pronation deformities are frequently observed, particularly in spastic-type CP (Koman et al., 2004). The imbalance between the pronator muscle group (pronator teres, pronator quadratus) and the supinator muscle group (supinator, biceps brachii) leads to the forearm remaining in a persistent pronated position (Sahoo et al., 2017). This deformity is not only aesthetically concerning but also results in significant functional limitations. Both fine and gross motor skills-such as washing the face, handshaking, and clapping-are adversely affected (Soutar \& McComas, 1990). Additionally, children may experience difficulty using assistive devices such as walkers, which in turn can negatively impact ambulation (Flett, 2003).

An elbow fixed in pronation forces children to compensate for limited range of motion by using shoulder and trunk movements, which over time predisposes them to abnormal postural development (Gracies, 2005). In advanced cases, structural alterations such as posterolateral radial head dislocations may also occur (Van Heest \& House, 2000). Both conservative (orthoses, botulinum toxin injections, physical therapy) and surgical interventions are employed in the treatment of pronation deformities. Surgical options include tenotomy of the pronator teres and pronator quadratus, muscle transfers, or combined procedures (Zancolli, 1975). However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding which surgical method should be applied to which patient group and at what stage (House et al., 1981).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of distal soft-tissue release surgery for the treatment of elbow pronation deformity on upper extremity function in children with cerebral palsy.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

Being between 6 and 16 years of age,

Having a diagnosis of spastic-type cerebral palsy,

presenting with an elbow pronation deformity requiring surgical intervention,

obtaining consent from the parent/guardian

Disqualifiers

History of previous upper-extremity surgery

History of progressive neurological disease

Cognitive or physical capacity insufficient to complete the assessment tools

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Upper extremity soft-tissue release

    Procedure/Surgery

    Surgical tenotomy of the pronator teres and pronator quadratus muscles accompanied by distal soft-tissue release

Treatment groups

28 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: surgeryOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

House Classification

Upper extremity function will be assessed using the House Functional Classification System. The scale classifies spontaneous use of the affected upper extremity during daily activities into 9 levels (0-8), where higher scores indicate better upper extremity function.

Time frame
5 times (pre-opperative, 6. month, 12. month, 18. month, 24. month)
2

Manual Ability Classification System

Manual ability will be assessed using the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), a 5-level classification system evaluating how children use their hands to handle objects in daily activities. Level I indicates the best manual ability and Level V indicates the most severe limitation.

Time frame
5 times (pre-opperative, 6. month, 12. month, 18. month, 24. month)
3

Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test

Upper extremity motor skill quality will be assessed using the Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST). The assessment evaluates dissociated movements, grasp, weight bearing, and protective extension. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better upper extremity motor performance.

Time frame
5 times (pre-opperative, 6. month, 12. month, 18. month, 24. month)
4

Gonyometer

Upper extremity range of motion will be measured in degrees using a standard universal goniometer. Shoulder, elbow, wrist, and forearm joint motions will be evaluated. Higher degree values indicate greater joint range of motion.

Time frame
5 times (pre-opperative, 6. month, 12. month, 18. month, 24. month)

Secondary outcomes

Other outcomes

Locations

This trial has no locations.

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

This trial is not recruiting at the moment. You can still explore other options: