SOS for Caregiver Wellbeing

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
AgeNot listed
SponsorMurdoch Childrens Research Institute

About this trial

Parents and caregivers of children who have a chronic condition carry a large care burden and are at higher risk of having mental health symptoms. This study aims to see if completion of a mental health questionnaire by parents / caregivers at or before the child's paediatric appointment can help identify any symptoms of stress, anxiety or depression.

Following the questionnaire, parents / caregivers will be provided with the results of the questionnaire along with an information resource sheet. This will include information on anxiety, stress and depression, as well as different agencies they can contact to get support.

Parents / caregivers will be followed up at 3 and 6 months to see if they have any changes to mental health and quality of life, and whether they accessed any support services. Participants who did not complete the 3-month survey will be asked at the 6-month clinic visit to provide responses on an iPad to up to 5 questions selected from the 3-month survey. A text message will be sent prior to the visit to inform them.

The primary aim for this trial is to see whether parents / caregivers find this process acceptable, and whether it can work in a busy hospital clinic.

Eligibility criteria

This trial accepts healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

must be a parent of a child <18yo in an outpatient clinic at Royal Children's Hospital (in enrolled clinics either neuromuscular or diabetes)

able to complete a consent form in English without an interpreter

Disqualifiers

need for an interpreter to complete informed consent

Trial design

Design model

Single group

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Screening, Outcomes and Referral Pathways

    Other intervention

    All participants complete baseline screening with follow up at 3 and 6 months. A key feature of the study is that a standardised information resource sheet (to community-based services) is provided to all caregivers, regardless of their screening scores. Primary outcomes focus on implementation feasibility and acceptability, while secondary outcomes examine service uptake and longitudinal measurement of caregiver wellbeing. This differs from existing research by providing resources universally rather than only to those scoring above clinical thresholds. Our longitudinal follow-up addresses an evidence gap identified in our systematic review - limited published data on downstream effects on actual service uptake and mental health outcomes over time. The services in the resource sheet also link to routine clinical care that doesn't require specialist support programs with dedicated funding.

Treatment groups

100 Participants
are divided into 1 treatment group
Group A: Screening outcome - information resource sheetOther 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Acceptability of the overall SOS Model for caregivers

The proportion of caregivers with a 95% confidence interval who completed screening questionnaires and received information resource sheets who report it as acceptable as measured by response to a text message: "Thinking about your recent outpatient clinic appointment with your child at The Royal Children's Hospital, did you find the SOS Model (screening, outcomes and feedback, support pathways for your own mental health and wellbeing) acceptable?" Response: Yes/No

Time frame
Day 7
2

The proportion of eligible caregivers who provide informed consent and enrol in the trial

The proportion of eligible caregivers with a 95% confidence interval who provide informed consent and enrol in the trial, calculated as the number of consenting participants divided by the total number of caregivers invited to participate.

Time frame
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
3

The proportion of caregivers who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 3-month survey.

The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 3-month survey.

Time frame
3 months
4

The proportion of caregivers who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 6-month survey.

The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 6-month survey.

Time frame
6 months

Secondary outcomes

1

The proportion of caregivers reporting comfort (acceptability) when completing the mental health survey as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report a level of comfort when completing the mental health survey in the outpatient clinic setting using a study-designed measure in the caregiver survey Response: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1= Very uncomfortable to 5 = Very comfortable

Time frame
3 months
2

The proportion of caregivers who would recommend to others completing a mental health and wellbeing survey (acceptability) as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who would recommend completing a mental health and wellbeing survey to others as using a study-designed measure in the caregiver survey. Response: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1= very unlikely to 5= very likely

Time frame
3 months
3

The proportion of caregivers reporting comfort (acceptability) when discussing their survey results with a clinician as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

* The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report feeling comfortable discussing their mental health and wellbeing questionnaire results with one of the clinicians asked on a study-designed measure in the caregiver survey * Response: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1= Very uncomfortable to 5= Very comfortable.

Time frame
3 months
4

The proportion of clinicians who report feeling their interactions were well-received in a survey on their experience as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

The proportion of clinicians, with a 95% confidence interval, who report feeling their interactions were well-received in a survey on their experience (acceptability) Response: 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1= Not very well-received to 5= Very well-received

Time frame
4 weeks

Other outcomes

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Lead sponsor

National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

Collaborator

University of Melbourne

Collaborator

Royal Children's Hospital

Collaborator