Success of Endodontic Treatment With Different Obturation Techniques and Sealer Cements
Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorUniversity of Siena
About this trial
The present study aims to compare the radiographic success of endodontic treatment using Orstavik's criteria between two sealers: AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) and Neosealer Flo (Avalon Biomed, Bradenton, Florida, USA), as well as between two obturation techniques: continuous wave and single cone. The study includes 270 patients, with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Clinical and radiographic variables will be assessed, including quality of obturation, lesion healing, and restoration. The study seeks to determine if the use of bioceramic sealer is effective regardless of the obturation technique used, highlighting the importance of clinical follow-up to evaluate endodontic treatment success.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
None
Disqualifiers
Patients with systemic conditions that may impair healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression).
Teeth with root fractures, resorption, or open apices.
Incomplete clinical or radiographic records.
Cases with poor-quality radiographs or lack of standardization for evaluation
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- AH Plus (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA)
- NeoSealer Flo
- Continuous Wave Condensation
- Single Cone Technique
Treatment groups
270 Participants
are divided into 4 treatment groupsSponsors and collaborators
Source ClinicalTrials.gov