The Effectiveness of Adhesive Versus Conventional Nasoalveolar Molding on Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age7-12
SponsorAl-Azhar University

About this trial

The present study will compare the effectiveness of adhesive nasoalveolar molding (GS-NAM) and conventional nasoalveolar molding on the alveolar ridge, nasal, and labial growth in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

objectives: -

1. Evaluation of the anatomical position of the greater and lesser segments of the maxilla related to a stable midline anatomical point. 2. Evaluation of the nasal symmetry.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age: 1- 8 weeks.

Gender: male and female.

Patients with a unilateral cleft alveolus and lip.

No developmental syndromes or atypical cleft pathology in medical history.

Disqualifiers

Patients with a bilateral cleft alveolus and lip

Syndromic patient

Uncooperative caregiver

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Nasoalveolar molding in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Treatment groups

30 Participants
are divided into 3 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators