The Efficacy and Safety of Y-3 Intracalvariosseous Injection Versus Intravenous Injection in the Treatment of Acute Large Hemispheric Infarction

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-80
Sponsoryilong Wang

About this trial

A pilot study confirmed the feasibility and safety of neuroprotectant Y-3 intracalvariosseous(ICO) injection in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (mMCAI), showing a trend in improving 90-day functional scores compared to conventional treatment. The aim of this trial is to further investigate the efficacy and safety of ICO injection of Y-3 compared to intravenous injection in patients with acute large hemispheric infarction(LHI) who has contraindications of reperfusion therapy or have got poor reperfusion therapy outcomes.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

18≤Age≤80 years;

First stroke or complete self-care before the onset of current stroke (mRS 0-1);

Administration of drugs can be completed within 24h of the onset of signs and symptoms of neurological deficits (in patients with wake-up strokes or unwitnessed strokes, the time of onset is defined as the time of last normal presentation);

16≤ NIHSS ≤32 points, and the sum of the scores of motor arm and motor leg is ≥6;

Disqualifiers

Complicated with acute cerebral hemorrhage and subarachnoid hemorrhage;

Complicated with acute posterior circulation cerebral infarction or severe posterior circulation stenosis (>70%);

Or imaging suggests that the area of cerebral infarction is involved bilaterally;

The cause of the TOAST classification was considered as intracranial artery dissection, vasculitis, moyamoya disease and other etiological types.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Y-3 ICO injection
  • Y-3 intravenous injection
  • Conventional treatment

Treatment groups

134 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Sponsors and collaborators

yilong Wang

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Sponsor institution