TIVA Versus Balanced Anesthesia on Muscle Mass in CRC Surgery

Trial statusRecruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18+
SponsorGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

About this trial

This study is aimed at clarifying changes in body composition during the perioperative period and identifying risk factors for skeletal muscle mass loss in patients with colorectal cancer. The investigators will asess the impact of the type of anaesthesia (total intravenous anaesthesia/sevoflurane anaesthesia) for colorectal surgery on the muscle function and mass, which will be evaluated using ultrasound, dynamometry and bioimpedance.

Eligibility criteria

This trial does not accept healthy volunteers

Qualifiers

None

Disqualifiers

lack the capacity to consent

extremity amputation

paraplegia

diseases affecting the muscles (such as stroke, lower-limb immobilization from a plaster, neurodegenerative diseases, peripheral neuropathy or muscle dystrophy)

Trial design

Design model

Parallel

Treatments tested in this trial

  • total intravenous anaesthesia

    Procedure/Surgery

    evaluate the impact of the type of anaesthesia (total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)/sevoflurane anaesthesia) for colorectal surgery on the muscle function and mass

  • sevoflurane anaesthesia

    Procedure/Surgery

    evaluate the impact of the type of anaesthesia (total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA)/sevoflurane anaesthesia) for colorectal surgery on the muscle function and mass

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups
Group A: total intravenous anaesthesiaActive comparator 1 intervention
Group B: sevoflurane anaesthesiaActive comparator 1 intervention

Trial outcomes

Primary outcomes

1

Ultrasonographic assessment of muscle mass

Ultrasonographic muscle assessment is standardised in the assessment of muscle according to the SARCUS (Sarcopenia through UltraSound) working group recommendations. Rectus femoris muscle will be evaluated at 50% distance between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior pole of the patella, in a lying position with knees in 10°, for muscle thickness and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Three measurements will be taken for each data point, and the average value will be used for further analysis. The biceps brachii muscle will be evaluated at 50% distance acromioclavicular joint and the elbow crease, in a supine position. Muscle thickness can be easily defined as the maximal vertical distance between the superficial and deep fasciae.

Time frame
From enrollment to 5 days after surgery
2

Muscle function assessment

Measuring grip strength is simple and inexpensive. Grip strength will be determined bilaterally. Each measurement will be performed three times on the left and right extremities with 20 seconds intervals between the measurements. The maximum measured value in kilograms will be used for analysis.

Time frame
From enrollment to 5 days after surgery
3

Bioimpedance assessment of lean and fat tissue mass

The bioimpedance measurements will be performed by a trained operator according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The Body Composition Monitor provides a quantitative measure of lean tissue and fat tissue mass. In contrast to earlier bioimpedance methodologies, the bioimpedance spectroscopy expresses body composition as a three-compartment model, providing overhydration, lean tissue index (LTI), and fat tissue index (FTI), whereby LTI and FTI are the respective tissue masses normalized to height squared.

Time frame
From enrollment to 5 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes

1

Hospital length of stay

Time frame
From enrollment to the patient discharge, up to 52 weeks
2

Mortality

Time frame
28 and 90-day mortality after surgery

Other outcomes

1

Correlation

Correlation between muscle strength and muscle mass using dynamometry and echography and bioimpedance at different time points

Time frame
From enrollment to 5 days after surgery

Sponsors and contacts

Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.

Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Lead sponsor

Regional Institute of Oncology, Iasi, Romania

Collaborator