To Compare the Two Implant Placement Protocols to Evaluate Placement Accuracy and Post-operative Healing of the Implant

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-85
SponsorUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham

About this trial

The goal of this study is to evaluate two commonly utilized surgical guide protocols to determine dental implant placement accuracy compared to pre-operative computerized planning, post-operative healing and bone levels to 12-months post-placement, and patient assessed post-operative discomfort and healing using a visual acuity scale (VAS).

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

English speaking

At least 18 years old

Must be a patient of the UAB Dental School

Able to read and understand informed consent document

Disqualifiers

Non-English speaking

Less than 18 years old

Smokers/tobacco users (>10 cigarettes/day)

Patients with systemic pathologies or conditions contraindicating oral surgical procedures or adversely affecting wound healing

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Pilot Drill Guide (PDG)
  • Fully Guided (FG)

Treatment groups

40 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups