About this trial
Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During RTS, division, dissection, and sealing of lung tissue, bronchi, and blood vessels can be performed using handheld staplers with assistance from a bedside surgeon (Surgeon-Assisted), or totally robotically with robotic staplers and energy devices by the console surgeon (Totally Robotic). Totally Robotic lung resection enables the operating surgeon to perform the case independently, but its implication on costs and patient outcomes remains unknown. There also is, however, a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for dissection and vessel sealing in RTS. This RCT aims to evaluate the costs and perioperative patient outcomes of Totally Robotic lung resection using the Vessel Sealer Extend energy device (for vessels \<7mm) and the SureForm robotic stapler (Intervention) versus Surgeon-Assisted robotic lung resection using the Signia stapler (Control) during RTS for NSCLC using the da Vinci system.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Age between 18 and 120 years at time of consent
Ability to speak and understand English
Clinical stage I, II or IIIa NSCLC
Candidate for RTS, as determined by the operating surgeon
Disqualifiers
Anticoagulation with inability to cease anticoagulant therapy prior to surgery
Incurable coagulopathy
Systemic vascular disease or vasculitis
Not a candidate for RTS
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Medtronic Signia Stapler
- Vessel Sealer Extend Energy Device and SureForm Stapler