Totally Robotic Versus Surgeon-Assisted Robotic Lung Resection For Early-Stage NSCLC

ConditionLung Cancer
Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-120
SponsorSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

About this trial

Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RTS) is safe and effective for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). During RTS, division, dissection, and sealing of lung tissue, bronchi, and blood vessels can be performed using handheld staplers with assistance from a bedside surgeon (Surgeon-Assisted), or totally robotically with robotic staplers and energy devices by the console surgeon (Totally Robotic). Totally Robotic lung resection enables the operating surgeon to perform the case independently, but its implication on costs and patient outcomes remains unknown. There also is, however, a lack of prospective research evaluating the costs of the two methods for dissection and vessel sealing in RTS. This RCT aims to evaluate the costs and perioperative patient outcomes of Totally Robotic lung resection using the Vessel Sealer Extend energy device (for vessels \<7mm) and the SureForm robotic stapler (Intervention) versus Surgeon-Assisted robotic lung resection using the Signia stapler (Control) during RTS for NSCLC using the da Vinci system.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age between 18 and 120 years at time of consent

Ability to speak and understand English

Clinical stage I, II or IIIa NSCLC

Candidate for RTS, as determined by the operating surgeon

Disqualifiers

Anticoagulation with inability to cease anticoagulant therapy prior to surgery

Incurable coagulopathy

Systemic vascular disease or vasculitis

Not a candidate for RTS

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Medtronic Signia Stapler
  • Vessel Sealer Extend Energy Device and SureForm Stapler

Treatment groups

120 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups