About this trial
This HTX treatment study evaluates the effects of chest tube size and the benefits of daily irrigations on acute HTX. 20 acutely injured but stable trauma patients requiring a chest tube for HTX will be enrolled. Patients will be assigned a 28Fr or 14 Fr chest tube with serial lavage and drainage. The endpoints will be HTX volume (by CT scan), complications, additional interventions, hospital length of stay, chest tube duration, provider feedback, and patient-reported outcomes.
Eligibility criteria
This trial does not accept healthy volunteersQualifiers
Able to provide consent for the research study
More than 15 years of age
Presence of acute traumatic HTX or HTX-PTX diagnosed on chest CT scan within 24 hours of injury and clinical indication for drainage (hemothorax of moderate or large size greater then 300 mL)
Hemodynamic stability (heart rate 120 beats per minute; systolic blood pressure 90 mmHg)
Disqualifiers
Less than 15 years of Age
Prisoner
Pregnant due to the risk of CT scans
HTX or HTX-PTX not requiring drainage or drainage performed prior to randomization/enrollment
Trial design
Single group
Treatments tested in this trial
CLR Irrigator
DeviceAll enrolled patients will have their hemothorax treated with a CLR device that allows for easy suction and irrigation through indwelling catheters,
Serial Lavage and Drainage
Procedure/SurgeryThe current protocol is to do a singular lavage and drainage, this study will investigate the benefits of daily lavage.
28 Fr Open Chest Tube
DevicePatients will have a standard 28 Fr open chest tube or a percutaneous 14Fr chest tube placed.
Percutaneous 14Fr Chest Tube
DevicePatients will have a standard 28 Fr open chest tube, or a percutaneous 14Fr chest tube placed.
Treatment groups
Trial outcomes
Primary outcomes
Remaining Hemothorax Volume at 72 hours
Assessed by CT and Mergo Formula
Secondary outcomes
Number of patients requiring intervention for retained hemothorax (excluding those who require intervention for other treatment)
All interventions focused on resolving any remaining hemothorax
Patient Tolerability - Numerical Rating Scale Insertion Perception Experience
Patient perception of the drainage and lavage procedure ranging from 1 (tolerable) to 5 (worst experience of my life). Did this Drainage and Lavage procedure resolve, lessen or worsen the patient's symptoms?
Patient Tolerability - Insertion Perception Experience (IPE) Perception Experience (IPE)
Patient perception of the chest tube insertion procedure. 1. = It was okay, I can tolerate it, I can do it again. 2. = It was okay, but I don't want to go through this again. 3. = It was a bad experience for me. 4. = It was a worse experience for me. 5. = It was the worst experience of my life!
Ease of CLR System Use - Industry-Standard System Usability Scale (SUS)
By physician who used the CLR Irrigator System. 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (low) to strongly agree (high).
Sponsors and contacts
Click on the lead sponsor to view all of their trials.
University of Pennsylvania
Lead sponsor
CLR Medical
Collaborator