About this trial
In recent year, non-intubated anesthesia had emerged as an available alternative for thoracic procedure. Whether non-intubated tracheal/carinal reconstruction confers distinct perioperative advantages over the conventional intubated approach remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and perioperative outcomes of non-intubated versus intubated approaches in tracheal and carinal reconstruction.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Airway diseases were diagnosed by chest enhanced CT and bronchoscopy
The patients with age ≥ 18 and ≤ 80 years old
ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) stage: I-III
sign the informed consent. -
Disqualifiers
The patients have proved history of congestive heart failure, angina without good control with medicine; ECG-proved penetrating myocardial infarction; hypertension with bad control; valvulopathy with clinical significance; arrhythmia with high risk and out of control
The patients have severe systematic intercurrent disease, such as active infection or poorly controlled diabetes; coagulation disorders; hemorrhagic tendency or under treatment of thrombolysis or anticoagulant therapy
Airway anatomical abnormalities due to a history of surgery
Patients present with other malignancy
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- non-intubated tracheal and carinal reconstruction
- intubated tracheal and carinal reconstruction
Treatment groups
Sponsors and collaborators
Shuben Li
Lead sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Sponsor institution