About this trial
Randomized, parallel-group, assessor-blinded clinical trial at Tanta University Hospitals comparing ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB) versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in male children (1-5 years) undergoing hypospadias repair. Seventy participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive sESPB or caudal block with 0.25% bupivacaine (0.5-1 mL/kg; maximum 20 mL) after induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcome is pain over the first 24 hours, assessed using the FLACC scale at prespecified time points. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, parent/guardian satisfaction, hemodynamic trends, and predefined adverse effects (e.g., motor weakness, urinary retention, respiratory depression, hematoma, infection at injection site). Perioperative care is standardized; rescue pethidine is administered when FLACC ≥4. The trial evaluates whether sESPB provides superior or comparable analgesia with fewer adverse effects than caudal block.
Eligibility criteria
Qualifiers
Male children aged 1-5 years
ASA physical status I-II
Scheduled for elective hypospadias repair under general anesthesia
Parent or legal guardian provides written informed consent
Disqualifiers
Parent/guardian refusal of participation
Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
Infection at the intended injection site (sacral/caudal region) or systemic infection
Allergy/hypersensitivity to amide local anesthetics (e.g., bupivacaine) or study medications
Trial design
Treatments tested in this trial
- Ultrasound-guided sacral erector spinae plane block (sESPB)
- Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block