Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Pediatric Surgery

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age0-16
SponsorHospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago

About this trial

Tracheal intubation in paediatric patients is a high-risk procedure in which failure to achieve successful intubation on the first attempt is associated with an increased risk of complications, including hypoxaemia and airway trauma. Videolaryngoscopes have been increasingly adopted in clinical practice because they improve glottic visualisation; however, evidence of their benefit in paediatric patients remains inconsistent.

The VIDEOKIDS trial is a large, pragmatic, international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial designed to compare videolaryngoscopy with direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique for tracheal intubation in paediatric patients undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia. The primary objective is to determine whether videolaryngoscopy increases the rate of successful intubation on the first attempt compared with direct laryngoscopy.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Paediatric patients (age 0-16 years),

Undergoing elective or scheduled surgery under general anaesthesia requiring orotracheal intubation,

Planned tracheal intubation using either videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy as the initial technique,

Informed or general consent given, according to the relevant ethics committee statement,.

Disqualifiers

Known upper airway anatomical abnormalities or clinical conditions requiring a specific intubation technique (e.g., fibreoptic intubation),

Requirement for emergent tracheal intubation that does not allow adequate randomisation,

Refusal of parents or legal guardians to participate in the study.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Videolaryngoscope
  • Direct Laryngoscope

Treatment groups

5,562 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups