Videolaryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy for Double Lumen Tube Lumen Tube Placement - A Multicentre Randomized-controlled Trial (VOLCANO Study)

Trial statusNot yet recruiting
Trial phaseNot applicable
Trial typeInterventional
Biological sexAll
Age18-99
SponsorLuca Brazzi

About this trial

The general aim of the study is to observe whether the use of the Mc Grath™ videolaryngoscope instead of direct laryngoscopy can represent, as in the case of the single-lumen tube, an added value in the placement of the double-lumen tube for surgical procedures involving one-lung ventilation, making intubation on the first attempt more likely and quicker. Secondary objectives include evaluating the presence of an advantage of the Mc Grath™ videolaryngoscope over direct laryngoscopy for the correct placement of the double-lumen tube, the need for additional maneuvers during the intubation procedure, and the presence of intra- and post-procedural complications.

Eligibility criteria

Qualifiers

Age > 18 years

General anesthesia

One-lung ventilation via double-lumen tube

Disqualifiers

Patients who refuse to consent to participation in the study.

Patients scheduled for awake intubation due to pre-operative evaluation findings of predictors of difficult oxygenation that contraindicate intubation under general anesthesia.

Patients with anatomical anomalies leading to tracheal and/or laryngeal displacement/compression.

Patients with contraindications to double-lumen tube placement.

Trial design

Treatments tested in this trial

  • Mc Grath Videolaryngoscope

Treatment groups

750 Participants
are divided into 2 treatment groups

Locations

This trial has no locations

Sponsors and collaborators

Luca Brazzi

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy

Sponsor institution

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Molinette Hospital

Collaborator