Acute Coronary Syndrome

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of novel P-CAB (tegoprazan 50 mg once daily) as compared with standard PPI (rabeprazole 20 mg once daily) for protection of GI events in patients with known cardiac and vascular disease receiving chronic use of antithrombotic drugs (either antiplatelets, OAC, and its combinations) who are at high GI bleeding risk. The primary hypothesis is that P-CAB (experimental arm) would non-inferior to PPI (standard arm) with respect to the rate of the primary composite end point of GI events at 12 months after randomization.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate whether artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms can predict or exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in adults using data generated by routine hematology testing. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Can AI algorithms based on white blood cell (WBC) data predict or exclude ACS in subjects with suspected ACS? * Can erythrocyte (EC) and/or thrombocyte (TC) data, where available, improve or complement WBC-based AI prediction of ACS? * How does the diagnostic performance of the AI algorithms compare with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn), and can the combination of AI algorithms and hs-cTn improve diagnostic performance? Participants will undergo clinical assessment and blood testing as part of usual clinical care. Their previously generated clinical information, hematology data, and hs-cTn results will be used to train and test the AI algorithms. Participation in the study does not determine the indication for coronary angiography or treatment, and no additional study-specific treatments are performed.

The purpose of this trial is to learn about the effects of inclisiran in people with serious heart conditions (acute coronary syndromes), when this treatment is started early after hospital admission. To do this, researchers will test the effects of inclisiran compared to placebo, when given with standard treatment.

This is a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, phase 3 multicenter study in subjects recently hospitalized for ACS and with the appropriate genetic profile. Subjects will provide informed consent before any study-specific procedures are performed. A separate informed consent will be allowed for an initial pre-screening genetic testing. Subjects meeting the AA genotype will then consent to the full study and confirmatory genetic testing as required. Subject enrollment may begin in the hospital and will continue following release from the hospital or may begin following release from hospital. Screening procedures may be performed at the time of the index ACS event or anytime thereafter, with the condition that randomization must occur within the mandated window (up to12 weeks after the index event). Subjects will be assessed based on their medical history. Those who are likely to qualify will undergo Genotype Assay testing to evaluate genetic determination for the presence of AA genotype.

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) in the treatment of subjects with up to two de novo lesions in native coronary arteries compared to the Xience coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) system

More than 25% of patients referred for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) suffer from non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). In this particular setting, balancing between the prevention of thrombosis and the risk of bleeding remains challenging. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) prevents stroke and systemic embolism, but has not been shown to prevent stent thrombosis (ST). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces the incidence of recurrent ischemic events and ST, but is less effective in reducing the incidence of cardioembolic stroke associated with AF. A common guideline-supported practice is to combine three drugs (OAC, aspirin and clopidogrel) in a triple therapy, which is associated with high annual risk (up to 25%) of major bleeding. Thus, new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to maintain the efficacy while improving the safety of treatment in patients with AF and ACS undergoing PCI. This is a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint, non-inferiority trial. 1194 patients with non-valvular AF that had undergone successful PCI due to an ACS within the previous 120 hours will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive one of the two treatments: dual therapy with dabigatran (150 mg twice daily or 110 mg twice daily) and ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily for 1 month, followed by 60 mg twice daily up to 12 months), or standard therapy according to current guidelines triple therapy with dabigatran (150 mg b.i.d. or 110 mg b.i.d.) plus clopidogrel (75 mg o.d.) plus aspirin (75 mg o.d.) followed by double therapy depending on the bleeding and ischaemic risk. Study treatment will be continued for 12 months. The primary study end-point is the first major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event (per ISTH), in a time-to-event analysis. The main secondary end-point is a composite efficacy end-point of thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism), death, or unplanned revascularization (PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting) at 12 months. We expect that dual antithrombotic therapy including reduced dose ticagrelor and dabigatran is at least non-inferior regarding bleeding risk and ischaemic protection, compared to the standard triple therapy in patients with AF and after ACS, treated with PCI.

Disorders of glycemic regulation are common in patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Abnormal glycaemia is observed in 50% of cases, in 30-40% diabetes, and in 25-35% fasting hyperglycaemia or glucose intolerance. Hyperglycemia is a major prognostic factor in ACS, with admission hyperglycemia having independent prognostic value for both short- and long-term major cardiovascular events (MACE), regardless of the presence of diabetes. Metabolically, several situations can be distinguished: * Hyperglycaemia occurs in known non-diabetic ACS subjects. It can be indicative of (i) Type 2 Diabetes or (ii) stress hyperglycaemia (diagnostic threshold for blood sugar varies according to learned societies, with HbA1c \< 6.5%). * Hyperglycaemia occurs in known diabetic ACS subjects Most studies use admission blood sugar as a predictor. However, it has recently been shown that glycemic variability indexes would be better predictors of MACE. Using continuous glucose measurement for 48 h, it has been shown that significant glycemic variability is a more powerful predictor of MACE at 1 year than admission glycemia The measurement of glycemic variability is mainly possible thanks to the development of CGM (continuous glucose measurement). To our knowledge, no study has been interested in evaluating the predictive value of the various glycemic parameters measured by CGM. Published studies have used continuous glucose measurements for very short periods (24 or 72 hours maximum), which limits these measurements. The freestyle libre Pro iQ (FSLPro iQ) is a professional sensor for continuous, non-invasive interstitial glucose measurement allowing the recording of glycemic parameters for 2 weeks. Our hypothesis is that glycaemic parameters, alone or in combination with each other or with other patient risk factors, measured with the Freestyle libre Pro iQ have a significant prognostic value in terms of cardiovascular clinical events at 12 months in a population of patients with ACS managed as standard and followed up.

Tuberculosis (TB) is a global pandemic that despite successful treatment and bacterial eradication can cause chronic ill health, such as pulmonary impairment after tuberculosis (PIAT) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). A recent Phase 2b double-blind randomised-controlled clinical trial shows that adjunctive doxycycline therapy is safe, accelerates resolution of inflammation, suppresses tissue damaging enzyme activity and decreases pulmonary cavity volume (1). We aim to determine if adjunctive doxycycline can reduce PIAT and improve cardiovascular outcomes in a fully powered Phase III trial of 8 weeks of adjunctive doxycycline alongside standard pulmonary TB (PTB) treatment. The investigators hypothesize that doxycycline inhibits tissue destruction in patients with PTB and thereby leads to improved lung function after treatment. Specific aims 1. To assess improvement in lung function as measured by forced expiratory volume (FEV1) predicted in PTB patients given doxycycline versus placebo. 2. To investigate whether doxycycline will hasten the resolution of pulmonary cavities measured by CT thorax 3. To investigate whether doxycycline can suppress inflammatory markers including matrix metalloproteinases 4. To investigate whether doxycycline can accelerate time to sputum conversion 5. To evaluate the effect of doxycycline on cardiovascular outcomes such as the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and pulmonary hypertension 6. To investigate whether doxycycline improves TB drug concentrations in sputum and plasma. 7. To assess the safety profile of doxycycline with concurrent standard anti-tuberculous treatment.

POLARIS is a prospective, single-centre, single-arm observational pilot registry evaluating the real-world safety and efficacy of the Focus np (Abluminus np, Concept Medical, Tampa, FL, USA) polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stent in consecutive adult patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The primary endpoint is target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months, defined per Academic Research Consortium-2 (ARC-2) criteria as the device-oriented composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation. Patients treated since January 2021 will be retrospectively identified and prospectively consented, with follow-up through 5 years. The registry will provide the first Western clinical evidence on this CE-marked device and serve as a template for a future national Swiss multicentre registry.

Patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease require timely detection of clinical deterioration to prevent adverse outcomes. Standard inpatient care relies on intermittent nursing vital-sign measurements performed every 4 to 8 hours, which can miss hemodynamic or arrhythmic events occurring between measurements. This trial evaluates whether digital wearable-based monitoring - wireless continuous measurement of vital signs and electrocardiography with a real-time alerting system - reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) compared with standard intermittent monitoring in patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease. The trial uses a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design in which four inpatient ward zones (clusters) are sequentially transitioned from standard care to wearable monitoring over five periods.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the feasibility and usability of a digital lifestyle platform designed to support patients after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. It will also assess patient engagement and the potential of the platform to support long-term self-management and healthy lifestyle behaviors in an outpatient setting. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is the platform feasible and acceptable for patients after rehabilitation? Do patients engage with and regularly use the platform over time? Can personalized digital recommendations support adherence to healthy behaviors and self-management? Researchers will evaluate a telemedicine platform that delivers individualized suggestions, including lifestyle applications, educational content, and advice from healthcare professionals. The content is tailored to patient needs and continuously adapted based on patient feedback. Participants will: Use the digital platform after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation for a defined follow-up period Receive personalized recommendations through the platform Rate the usefulness of recommendations to enable continuous adaptation Attend study visits or remote assessments to evaluate usability, engagement, and outcomes Continue standard outpatient care alongside the intervention

The Primary Objective is to determine if a new nuclear tracer (named 18F-Florbetaben) used with nuclear imaging (PET imaging) can detect inflamed plaque in patients with recent ACS or stroke/TIA.

The AIM-FFR trial is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial. The current trial will evaluate non-inferiority of MPFFR-guided PCI, compared with invasive FFR-guided PCI in patients with coronary artery disease.

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for a significant proportion of cardiovascular-related deaths. Early diagnosis and accurate risk stratification are crucial for improving clinical outcomes and guiding therapeutic decisions. Cardiac troponins (I and T) are highly sensitive and specific biomarkers of myocardial injury and represent the gold standard for the diagnosis of ACS (1). In recent years, inflammation has been recognized as a key contributor to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and plaque instability. Inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have gained attention as predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Elevated hs-CRP levels are associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and poor prognosis (2), while NLR reflects the balance between inflammatory activation and immune regulation and has been linked to severity of coronary artery disease and mortality in ACS patients (3). Echocardiography remains a cornerstone in the assessment of cardiac function, providing essential information about left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA). More recently, speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) has emerged as a sensitive tool for detecting subclinical myocardial dysfunction through parameters such as global longitudinal strain (GLS), even before a reduction in LVEF becomes apparent (4,5). Despite the established individual roles of cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers, limited data are available regarding their combined effect on cardiac function, particularly when integrated with advanced echocardiographic techniques. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the relationship between inflammatory biomarkers (hs-CRP, NLR), cardiac biomarker (troponin), and echocardiographic findings in patients with ACS to enhance early risk stratification and improve clinical decision-making.

The focus of this study is to test the efficacy of a 12-week, remotely delivered, positive-psychology-motivational interviewing (PP-MI) intervention, with additional twice weekly text messages for a total of 24 weeks (with interactive, algorithm-driven, goal-focused text messages in the final 12 weeks), compared to post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treatment as usual, in a randomized trial of 280 post-ACS patients with low baseline physical activity.

BioFreedom™ is the world's first polymer-free drug-coated stent (DCS), utilizing a proprietary microstructured surface technology. Its abluminal microporous surface directly carries BA9™ (a sirolimus derivative) with high lipophilicity. This design mitigates inflammatory responses while promoting early vascular healing and reducing thrombotic risk. Extensive clinical evidence has validated BioFreedom™'s superior performance in high-bleeding-risk (HBR) populations. However, comprehensive assessments of neointimal coverage and quantitative neointimal transformation post-implantation remain insufficient. With advancements in ultra-high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT), detailed evaluation of coronary stent healing has become feasible. This study will employ OCT to comparatively assess vascular healing patterns-including neointimal transformation and strut coverage-in ACS patients with HBR receiving either the commercially available BioFreedom™ DCS or Xience drug-eluting stent system. The findings will provide multidimensional insights into the devices' post-implantation efficacy and safety profiles.

Create a multicenter prospective registry that collects information from women affected by acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This registry aims to understand the diversity in the presentation of women with ACS. It proposes to conduct a thorough characterization of the women involved in the study through genetic, biochemical, and molecular analysis.This approach aims to identify any differences in the characteristics of women with ACS and to identify disease subtypes that may influence treatment options and clinical outcomes.

MILESTONE STUDY is dedicated to problems connected with patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and/or with left main narrowing who present symptoms of acute ischemia. For such kind of patients according to current ACC/AHA guidelines CABG (surgical revascularization) is recommended as a treatment method. In comparison with CABG, recent studies have shown that PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) is associated with a lower rate of periprocedural adverse events and similar long term event-free survival in patients with left main disease. Our latest non randomized registry and randomized LEMANS study, comparing LMCA (left main coronary artery) stenting with CABG confirmed above findings. LEMANS ACS (acute coronary syndrome) retrospective registry of patients with UPLMCA (unprotected LMCA) disease and non ST elevation ACS showed lower 30 day and trend toward lower one year mortality after PCI when compared with CABG. It should be stressed, that acute ischemia substantially increase the risk of CABG. In fact, there are limited data on the outcome of ULMCA stenting or CABG in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Similarly, all randomized studies comparing PCI vs CABG in multivessel disease included mainly patients with stable angina, small cohort of patients with unstable angina and they excluded patients with non ST elevation Myocardial infarction. In the SYNTAX study -largest PCI vs CABG trial, randomized patients were patients with low perioperative risk (logistic EUROSCORE \<5) and ACS patients routinely excluded. High perioperative risk patients were included only in PCI registry.

The previous Mono Antiplatelet and Colchicine Therapy (MACT) pilot study (NCT04949516) demonstrated that it was feasible to discontinue aspirin therapy and administer low-dose colchicine on the day after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in addition to potent P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, the efficacy and safety of MACT have not yet been investigated. The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical outcomes of ticagrelor P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy combined with colchicine immediately after PCI in patients with ACS. The main questions it aims to answer are: * What is the frequency of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, unplanned hospitalization leading to urgent revascularization, and major bleeding at 12 months post-intervention? * What is the frequency of stent thrombosis at 12 months post-intervention? For pre-specified analyses, researchers will compare MACT to less than 1 month, 3-month, and 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (individual patient data from the T-PASS \[NCT03797651\] and TICO \[NCT02494895\] trials) to determine if MACT is effective in treating ACS. Participants will: * Take low-dose colchicine in addition to ticagrelor maintenance therapy, discontinuing aspirin the day after PCI. * Take a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) test 1 month after PCI. * Discontinue colchicine if the hs-CRP level is less than 2 mg/L, or continue colchicine if it is not. * Visit the clinic for check-ups at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after PCI.

Most acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are caused by plaque complications triggering thrombotic events in the culprit plaques. Plaque complications include plaque rupture (Ruptured Fibrous Cap-RFC) with exposure of highly thrombogenic substrate to the flow and plaque erosion (Intact Fibrous Cap-IFC) a condition characterized by endothelial/intimal damage occurring over non-ruptured plaques. Far less commonly (\<5%), calcified nodules (CN) may trigger acute coronary thrombosis. Plaque rupture accounts for 75% of fatal AMI in autopsy series, while erosion is found in about 25% of cases. These proportions have been supported by in vivo invasive studies (OCT) and OCT-pathology correlation studies. However, it remains unclear whether OCT findings consistently align with in vivo pathology-based evidence of RFC in ACS. Guidelines addressing treatments of ACS unanimously indicate percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to restore the coronary flow. Pre-PCI thrombus aspiration is not currently indicated by most guidelines, with the exception of cases with very high thrombus burden. The samples retrieved from thrombus aspiration can be suitable for pathology investigation and aim to evaluate the presence of plaque components in the context of the thrombotic material, a finding that demonstrates plaque rupture as the substrate for the acute coronary event. These studies are uniquely qualified to provide information on the correct OCT-based interpretation of plaque complications in ACS and require OCT imaging quality suitable to classify RFC, IFC, and CN. Therefore, a prospective OCT-pathology study was designed using the pre-PCI aspirated material from patients with high thrombus burden, to explore the contribution of pathology study in OCT-based classification of plaque complications.

Among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and stent implantation, 17.5% are both at high bleeding risk (HBR) and have undergone complex PCI, which also places them at high thrombotic risk. In this population, several dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies may be considered: (1) de-escalation of DAPT intensity after 1 to 3 months (switch from ticagrelor/prasugrel to clopidogrel), (2) shortening DAPT duration to 1 to 3 months followed by antiplatelet monotherapy, (3) 12-month clopidogrel-based DAPT, and (4) 12-month ticagrelor/prasugrel-based DAPT. Selecting the most appropriate DAPT strategy in this dual-risk context is complex, and clinical trial evidence is limited for this specific subgroup. In the absence of clear guideline recommendations to support decision-making for patients facing both elevated bleeding and thrombotic risks, structured shared decision-making support is needed. In this context, within research project 2025-3499 conducted with pharmacy residents, we developed a patient decision aid (PDA) designed to support shared decision-making by helping patients understand their risks, available options, and potential consequences, so they can express their preferences regarding antiplatelet therapy. The PDA aims to facilitate shared decisions by improving patients' understanding of benefits and harms and aligning choices with patient values. A preliminary version of the tool has already undergone alpha testing with a small group of internal users (physicians, pharmacists, and patient partners). The next step is beta testing, that is, real-world testing with the target population and clinicians to evaluate usability and acceptability in routine practice.

AMIPE is both a retrospective and prospective study which was designed in order to collect data of patients with acute coronary syndromes and myocardial injury and to improve the knowledge about these conditions.

Study Objectives 1. Screening and identification of diagnostic biomarkers: To establish the exhaled volatile organic compound (VOC) profile of patients with acute high-risk chest pain and to differentiate high-risk chest pain patients. 2. Exploration of aldehyde detection: To investigate the role of exhaled aldehyde detection in high-risk chest pain patients; to establish and validate an early differential diagnostic model of exhaled VOCs for high-risk chest pain, thereby optimizing emergency triage procedures. 3. Prognostic evaluation: To assess the predictive value of VOC concentration changes for in-hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in high-risk chest pain patients. 4. Novel diagnostic markers: To explore new biomarker combinations superior to conventional diagnostic indicators. Study Hypotheses 1. High-risk chest pain patients present a VOC profile distinct from that of healthy individuals and patients with other causes of chest pain. 2. Baseline levels and early changes of exhaled VOCs can achieve both rapid diagnosis and risk stratification. 3. Exhaled VOCs can predict the prognosis of high-risk chest pain patients. Sample Size Calculation This is an exploratory study, aiming to enroll all patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department of our hospital between May 2025 and June 2026. Based on prior studies, the primary endpoint is assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) analysis, with α = 0.05 and 1-β = 0.90. The expected model AUC is 0.75, compared to a minimum acceptable AUC of 0.65. Assuming a group ratio of 1:2 (high-risk: non-high-risk), Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS) software estimates a minimum sample size of approximately 1,320 patients. To enable subgroup analyses (e.g., acute coronary syndrome \[ACS\], pulmonary embolism \[PE\], aortic dissection \[AD\]) and the construction of multivariable predictive models, at least 150-300 patients per subgroup are required. According to preliminary investigation, the emergency department admits approximately 20 chest pain patients daily. To ensure model stability, cross-validation, and sufficient subgroup evaluation, a total of 6,000 patients will be prospectively enrolled, thereby enhancing scientific rigor and external validity. Primary Outcome Discrimination between high-risk and non-high-risk chest pain patients, assessed by AUC-ROC, sensitivity, and specificity. Secondary Outcomes 1. Missed diagnosis rate (the proportion of high-risk patients misclassified as low or intermediate risk by the model). 2. Average emergency department length of stay and medical costs under model-guided triage. 3. In-hospital mortality and incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Statistical Methods 1. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies or percentages; normally or approximately normally distributed continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation; and skewed data as median (P25, P75). Between-group comparisons will be performed using independent-samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U tests, or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables, and chi-square (χ²) tests or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. 2. Feature selection of VOCs will be performed using methods such as least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, followed by the construction of a VOC scoring model. 3. Prognostic factors will be assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. 4. Trajectory analysis will be applied to evaluate changes in VOC concentrations over time.

This international, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in elderly or high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the latest generation drug-coated balloon (DCB). The study includes patients with stable or unstable coronary syndromes and aims to assess rates of ischemic and bleeding adverse events.

The current study aims to investigate whether combining the standard medications prescribed after acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, and statins-into a single polypill can improve outcomes following an ACS event. Although these therapies are effective, gaps in adherence and uptake significantly contribute to risk or adverse events in the post-ACS period. This study is designed as a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized trial to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a polypill-based strategy for treatment of ACS.