Akut Kidney Injury

AKI causes high mortality and morbidity, especially in critically ill patients, and prolongs the patient's stay in the intensive care unit. Due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with AKI, many researchers are studying several new biomarkers for earlier detection of AKI, determination of etiologies, and prediction of outcomes. However, the use of these new biomarkers may be limited due to reimbursement issues. In addition to the therapeutic role of furosemide in fluid balance, blood pressure control, and hypercalcemia management, Chawla et al. recommend the furosemide stress test (FST) as a tool to predict AKI progression. Designing a test that predicts the probability of AKI progression will help us make better decisions regarding the optimal timing of RRT initiation. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the FST test in determining the progression of AKI in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit and the need for RRT using the noninvasive procedure furosemide stress test.

Acute kidney injury(AKI) is defined in the KDIGO guidelines as a ≥0.3 mg/dL (≥26.5 micromol/L) increase in serum creatinine in the previous 48 hours or a ≥1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline, known or presumed to have occurred in the previous seven days, or a urine volume \<0.5 mL/kg/hour for six hours. Given the high morbidity and mortality associated with AKI, many investigators are studying several novel biomarkers to detect AKI progression earlier, identify etiologies and predict outcomes. However, the utilisation of these novel biomarkers may be constrained by reimbursement considerations. The renal resistive index (RRI) is a well-established metric for evaluating renal perfusion; however, its application in the context of AKI has been a subject of recent debate. While RRI has been utilised to demonstrate perfusion in acute and chronic renal diseases, particularly in conjunction with ultrasonography, its efficacy remains a subject of scientific discourse. In addition, Boddi reported that RRI is a strong indicator of mortality and a diagnostic marker, especially in patients with persistent AKI. The present study aims to evaluate the appropriateness of using the RRI, a non-invasive procedure, to determine the progression of AKI stages and the need for renal replacement therapy in patients hospitalised in intensive care units.