Clinical trials

The goal of this study is to evaluate intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of margin negative, completely resected Stage II, IIIA, IIIB (with nodal involvement \[N2\]) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary hypothesis is that intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed by the investigator.

INTERSTELLAR study will generate critical prospective real-world evidence on the benefits of adding Anifrolumab to standard of care treatment for SLE in routine clinical practice, to inform physicians, payers and patients. The study will use clinical assessments that are relevant for SLE-treating physicians in routine clinical practice, as well as introduce a specific measure for skin manifestations to affirm the potency of anifrolumab in treating SLE-related skin manifestations. The study will use standardized objectives, inclusion/exclusion criteria and outcome measures across all countries participating in this study including GCC (Qatar, KSA), Mexico, CAMCAR (Costa Rica, Panama, Dominican Republic), Colombia, Argentina, Taiwan, and Egypt, and any other countries that may be included in the study, in order to facilitate a comparison and analysis across all countries included in this study.

The purpose of this study is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent, and in combination with pembrolizumab, versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in participants with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) unresectable locally advanced, or metastatic, breast cancer. The primary hypotheses are that sacituzumab tirumotecan as a single agent and sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab are superior to TPC with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) by blinded independent central review (BICR) in all participants.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in participants from previous Merck pembrolizumab-based parent studies who transition into this extension study. This study will consist of three phases: 1) First Course Phase, 2) Survival Follow-up Phase or 3) Second Course Phase. Each participant will transition to this extension study in one of the following three phases, depending on the study phase they were in at the completion of the parent study. Participants who were in the First Course Phase of study treatment with pembrolizumab or lenvatinib in their parent study will enter the First Course Phase of this study and complete up to 35 doses or more every 3 weeks (Q3W) or 17 doses or more every 6 weeks (Q6W) of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination or lenvatinib according to arm assignment. Participants who were in the Follow-up Phase in the parent study (post-treatment or Survival Follow-up Phase) will enter the Survival Follow-up Phase of this study. Participants who were in the Second Course Phase in their parent study will enter Second Course Phase of this study and complete up to 17 doses Q3W or 8 doses Q6W of study treatment with pembrolizumab or a pembrolizumab-based combination according to arm assignment. Any participant originating from a parent trial where crossover to pembrolizumab was permitted upon disease progression may be eligible for 35 doses as Q3W or 17 doses Q6W of pembrolizumab (approximately 2 years), if they progress while on the control arm and pembrolizumab is approved for the indication in the country where the potential eligible crossover participant is being evaluated.

The purpose of this Phase 2/3, randomized, multisite, open-label, dose confirmation, and expansion study is to evaluate the safety, and efficacy of zilovertamab vedotin (ZV) in combination with standard of care options for the treatment of rrDLBCL. This study will be divided into 2 parts: Dose Confirmation (Part 1) and Efficacy Expansion (Part 2) and will enroll participants who are at least 18 years of age with rrDLBCL. The hypotheses are: ZV in combination with rituximab, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) is superior to R-GemOx with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) per Lugano response criteria by blinded independent review committee (BICR); and that ZV in combination with bendamustine rituximab (BR) is superior to BR with respect to PFS per Lugano response criteria by BICR. With protocol amendment 4 (effective: 04-April-2024), enrollment in Cohort B (study arms Bendamustine Rituximab \[BR\] and ZV + BR) is discontinued. No efficacy outcome analysis and hypothesis testing will be conducted for Cohort B.

The goal of this study is to evaluate intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab for the adjuvant treatment of margin negative, completely resected Stage II, IIIA, IIIB (with nodal involvement \[N2\]) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary hypothesis is that intismeran autogene plus pembrolizumab is superior to placebo plus pembrolizumab with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) as assessed by the investigator.

The purpose of this extension study is to provide continued treatment with Roche investigational medicinal product (IMP\[s\]) monotherapy or Roche IMP(s) combined with other agent(s) or comparator agent(s) for eligible participants with cancer who are still on study treatment at the time of roll-over from the parent study and who do not have access to the study treatment locally.

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of opevesostat plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with one next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). The primary study hypothesis is that opevesostat is superior to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide with respect to radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR), in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation positive and negative participants.

This is a Phase III, randomized, open-label multicenter study that will evaluate the efficacy and safety of giredestrant compared with fulvestrant, both in combination with the investigator's choice of a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib, ribociclib or abemaciclib), in participants with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who have developed resistance to adjuvant endocrine therapy.

The purpose of this clinical study is to assess safety and explore usability and effectiveness of the test product, AAL-FAIOL. This study will be conducted in Central America.

The purpose of ARTEMIDE-Lung04 is to assess the efficacy and safety of rilvegostomig compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy as 1L treatment in participants with mNSCLC and whose tumors express PD-L1.

Adult patients (≥18 years) with confirmed cutaneous T-cell lymphoma evaluated at Hospital México between 2019 and 2025 will be retrospectively analyzed using EDUS records to describe their epidemiological profile, clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes.

Prospective study to assess lung cancer screening with low dose CT scan (LDCT) in Latin America (LATAM) and prospectively evaluate chest-XRay analyzed with artificial intelligence (AI) using qXRin (QURE ai) at the initial visit correlating with the findins of the initial LDCT in patients with other high risk criteria to develop lung cancer. 2000 patients will be recruited in 4 LATAM countries (Mexico 700 pts, Costa Rica 300 pts, Colombia 500 pts, Argentina 500 pts). All patients will be ≥50years of age with one of the following additional inclusion criteria: a. exposure to wood smoke (at least 100 hours/year), b.family history of lung cancer in a first degree relative, c. COPD and/or emphysema, d. smokers with a tobacco index of 10 y or more. The exclusion criteria include: a. lung cancer diagnosis or other type of cancer 5 years prior to screening, b. loss of 10% of baseline weight 6 months before inclusion, c. ineligible for LDCT, d. life expectancy ≤5 years, and e. previous history of pulmonary nodules. The primary objective of the study is the utility of LDCT-based lung cancer screening in identifying suspicious lung nodules in smokers and non-smokers across LATAM, with secondary objectives including: 1- Utility of qXR-LNMS (lung nodule malignancy score) of chest XRay for lung cancer risk assessment to exclude low risk patients from LDCT screening, 2- Utility of LDCT-based lung cancer screening in subjects with various risk profiles in LATAM, 3- Prevalence of lung nodules in the study population, 4-Mortality rate in the subjects diagnosed with an anomaly in the LDCT (with or without LC diagnosis).

The goal of this observational registry is to characterize the clinical features, severity, treatments, and outcomes of patients with atopic dermatitis in Costa Rica receiving systemic and advanced therapies in routine clinical practice. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis treated in specialized dermatology centers in Costa Rica? What treatments are used in real-world practice and how do they impact disease severity and patient-reported outcomes over time? Participants with atopic dermatitis receiving systemic or advanced therapies as part of their usual medical care will be followed longitudinally, with collection of clinical severity scores, treatment patterns, and outcomes during routine visits.

The goal of this observational study is to characterize the epidemiologic, clinical, severity, and therapeutic features of patients with psoriasis treated in Costa Rica between 2024 and 2025. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the demographic and clinical characteristics and severity profiles of psoriasis patients? What treatments are used in routine clinical practice, and how are they associated with disease severity and outcomes? Patients with psoriasis receiving dermatologic care during the study period will be included. Data will be obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records and clinical registries without intervention or modification of treatment.

The goal of this retrospective observational study is to characterize the clinical features, severity, comorbidities, and treatment patterns of pediatric psoriasis in patients managed in the Costa Rican Social Security System. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the demographic and clinical characteristics of pediatric psoriasis in Costa Rica? What disease severity profiles, comorbidities, and treatments are observed in routine care? All patients \<18 years with confirmed psoriasis evaluated during the study period will be included. Data will be obtained from electronic health records without intervention or modification of treatment.

This is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study designed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of detecting and classifying major ophthalmic diseases (glaucoma, cataract, diabetic retinopathy, and other retinal pathologies) in the Costa Rican population. The study will use approximately 15,000 existing medical images from digital archives of two ophthalmic centers in Costa Rica, without active participant recruitment or capture of new images. The primary motivation is that AI systems developed in other countries (primarily Asian, European, or North American populations) do not necessarily perform with the same accuracy when applied to Latin American populations. This study seeks to establish a precedent for the importance of locally validating any medical AI technology before clinical implementation.

The goal of this observational registry study is to characterize the clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic features of patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) in Costa Rica through a standardized national registry. The main question it aims to answer is: What are the clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic characteristics of patients with generalized pustular psoriasis registered in the country, and how do these relate to disease severity and evolution? Patients with GPP receiving routine dermatologic care in participating centers will have their demographic, clinical, severity, comorbidity, and treatment data recorded using a standardized case report form. Clinical assessments (e.g., GPPASI, PASI/BSA, DLQI), laboratory results, triggers, complications, and therapies will be documented and updated during periodic follow-up visits as part of usual care.

The goal of this observational registry study is to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of IL-23 inhibitors in patients with psoriatic disease (psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis) treated in Costa Rica. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Do IL-23 inhibitors (guselkumab or risankizumab) improve disease severity and quality of life in patients with psoriatic disease in routine clinical practice? * What is the safety profile and treatment persistence of IL-23 inhibitors in this population? * Patients receiving IL-23 inhibitors as part of their usual medical care will be followed longitudinally using standardized clinical measures (e.g., PASI, DLQI, DAPSA/BASDAI) and adverse-event reporting through a national registry.

The goal of this observational retrospective study is to characterize the epidemiologic, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic features of Hansen's disease cases in Costa Rica between 2018 and 2025. The main questions it aims to answer are: What are the epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of confirmed Hansen's disease cases in Costa Rica? What diagnostic methods, treatments, complications, and outcomes are observed in routine care? All confirmed Hansen's disease cases recorded in national surveillance and with available clinical records during 2018-2025 will be included. Data will be obtained from electronic health records and Ministry of Health reports without participant contact.

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Canaloplasty Device in Subjects with Open-Angle Glaucoma

The goal of this study is to learn what effects the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm has on the clinical outcomes of patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis after having a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using the Sapien 3 valve. The main questions the study aims to answer are: 1. Does the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm increase the technical success at exit from the procedure room? 2. Does the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm increase the device success at 30 days after the procedure? Participants already being evaluated for a TAVR as part of their regular medical care for bicuspid aortic stenosis will have their diagnostic images assessed using the ABC Bicuspid Sizing Algorithm to help determine their procedure type and valve size. They will have visits 30 days and one year after their procedure.

The present study will be based on a hybrid breast reconstruction approach with initial skin expansion using the Motiva Flora® Tissue Expander followed by a serial fat grafting session and a final step that includes the placement of a permanent breast implant Ergonomix2®.

The objective of this clinical trial is to assess the initial performance and safety of Motiva® Ergonomix2® Diamond®, Motiva Injector®, Motiva® Inflatable Balloon, Motiva® Reusable Channel Dissector, and Motiva® GEM Channel Separator utilized in a minimally invasive gluteal augmentation procedure, involving 120 healthy female participants. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Are the main side effects and complications experienced by participants who underwent a minimally invasive buttock enhancement procedure with Motiva Ergonomix2® Diamond®, the Motiva Injector®, the Motiva® Inflatable Balloon, the Motiva® Reusable Channel Dissector, and Motiva® GEM Channel Separator adequately characterized? * Can the Motiva Injector®, Motiva® Inflatable Balloon, the Motiva® Reusable Channel Dissector, and Motiva® GEM Channel Separator be successfully utilized, and are any failures in the process detected? * Does the Motiva® GEM Channel Separator effectively perform tissue dissection procedures without experiencing operational dysfunctions? * Are both the surgeon and the participant satisfied with the procedure outcomes? * Is the proper functioning of the Zen microtransponder verified? Participants will undergo a minimally invasive buttock enhancement procedure using the Ergonomix2® Diamond®, the Motiva Injector®, the Motiva® Inflatable Balloon, the Motiva® Reusable Channel Dissector, and Motiva® GEM Channel Separator, and have a follow-up of 24 months to see the results.

A prospective, single arm, non-randomized early feasibility study to evaluate the preliminary safety and performance of the XPAD conduit in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), scheduled to undergo elective above-knee femoral popliteal bypass surgery.