Apical Prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse, particularly apical prolapse, is a common condition among aging women, and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is considered the standard surgical treatment due to its high anatomical success. However, it poses technical challenges and risks related to sacral dissection. Laparoscopic pectopexy, a newer technique using the iliopectineal ligament for mesh fixation, offers a safer anatomical route with shorter operative time and fewer complications. The previous studies evaluate the sacrocolpopexy and pectopexy are all retrospective. This study is prospective randomized controlled study that adds Comparison on the success rate and learning curve of pectopexy versus sacrocolpopexy .

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of cyanoacrylate adhesive in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, which is the gold standard treatment for apical prolapse. The procedure is predominantly performed using minimally invasive techniques, such as laparoscopic or robotic methods. However, the operative time for this procedure often exceeds 180 minutes due to its technical complexity. Although the experience level of the surgical team can lead to a decrease in operative time, there is a concerning increase in the risk of postoperative complications as the duration of surgery extends. One strategy to mitigate overall operative time is to reduce the fixation time of the implant to the vaginal wall. Standard fixation involves using several sutures, but alternative fixation methods, including barbed sutures and cyanoacrylate adhesives, may demonstrate a reduction in fixation time. While there are only a few studies available on the use of cyanoacrylate adhesives for implant fixation, they generally indicate that this method is safe and can achieve an objective success rate of over 96% in resolving apical descent. However, the reported operative time using glue varies significantly across studies, ranging from 69 to 173 minutes. The aim of the current study is to assess the impact of a synthetic cyanoacrylate-based tissue adhesive on various factors, including implant fixation time, overall length of surgery, short- and long-term postoperative complications, risk of prolapse recurrence, and the cost-effectiveness of this method in comparison to traditional laparoscopic sutures. This will be conducted as a randomized prospective monocentric study that includes patients aged 18 to 75 years diagnosed with pelvic organ descent grade 2 or higher. Notably, individuals requiring uterine preservation, having undergone previous hysterectomy, or with precancerous or malignant uterine diseases will be excluded. The surgical approach will involve fixing the implant to the vaginal wall with cyanoacrylate adhesive in the target group, along with non-absorbable sutures. In contrast, the control group will follow traditional fixation methods using absorbable sutures in addition to non-absorbable ones. The study will evaluate outcomes using various questionnaires, including the POPQ for anatomical effect and PFDI-20 for subjective discomfort, while also assessing postoperative pain through the VAS scale. Expected results include a targeted reduction in implant fixation time by at least 20 minutes and a comprehensive evaluation of the method's cost-effectiveness based on reports from Brno University Hospital. This study is significant as it represents the first prospective randomized trial to investigate the effects of cyanoacrylate adhesive on operative time and cost-effectiveness compared to conventional suturing in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy