Arthroplasties, Knee Replacement

The goal of this randomised controlled feasibility trial is to find out whether it is possible to run a larger study of the Good Boost+ community based rehabilitation programme for people waiting for a primary total knee replacement. The study will look at how many people are willing to take part, whether they stay in the study, and whether they can follow the Good Boost+ programme as planned. It will also explore how acceptable the programme is to patients, NHS staff and leisure centre staff, and which outcome measures are most useful for a future full scale trial. The study will also look at what helps or hinders delivery of the programme in real world NHS and community settings. The main questions it aims to answer are: * How many people waiting for knee replacement surgery are willing to take part in the study * Whether participants can continue with the Good Boost+ programme as planned over the study period * Which outcome measures best capture any potential benefits of the programme * How acceptable the programme is to patients, NHS and leisure centre staff * What helps or makes it difficult to deliver the programme in practice. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. * Usual NHS care or * Usual NHS care plus the Good Boost+ programme Participants in the Good Boost+ programme will take part in six weekly group water based exercise sessions held in local swimming pools, as well as land based exercise sessions that can be done individually or by joining a virtual group. The exercise sessions are delivered through Good Boost's digital technology, using small waterproof tablet computers at swimming pools, and smartphones or computers for land-based sessions. Physiotherapy staff will provide guidance throughout, and volunteers will offer refreshments after pool sessions to support social connection. All participants, including those receiving usual NHS care only, will be asked to complete an exercise diary, rate their knee pain each week, and complete short questionnaires at 6 and 10 weeks after joining the study.

Background: Frailty is a geriatric syndrome of reduced physiologic reserve that increases surgical risk and is common among older adults undergoing hip or knee replacement. While prehabilitation has shown promise in enhancing outcomes, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in frail orthopedic patients is limited. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary data on the effectiveness of a multimodal prehabilitation program for frail patients undergoing elective hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods: A pilot RCT will be conducted at Landspítali-University Hospital. Patients ≥70 years scheduled for surgery with ≥2 months waiting time will be screened for frailty using PRISMA-7, the Clock Drawing Test, and Timed Up \& Go. Patients screening positive for any of the three screening tools will be randomized to multimodal prehabilitation or standard of care. The intervention includes comprehensive geriatric assessment, medication review, tailored physiotherapy using the Otago Exercise Programme, and nutritional counseling if at risk of malnutrition. We will conduct an external pilot for feasibility measures (overall enrollment, recruitment, retention, adherence). Secondary outcomes include physical performance, postoperative complications, patient-reported health status (WOMAC scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L ), length of primary hospital stay, discharge location, falls postoperatively, 180-day readmission and 180-day mortality. Significance: This trial may aid in the design of larger RCT study and provide a signal of the role of multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes, including quality of life and health status among frail arthroplasty patients.

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial with two parallel arms. The main objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of creatine supplementation in older adults who have been operated on for total knee arthroplasty and undergoing a usual rehabilitation program. The intervention will consist of daily creatine monohydrate supplementation for 12 weeks. The intervention will start after surgery with a loading dose of 20g/day for 1 week and then continue with a maintenance dose of 5g/day for 11 weeks. Main outcome mesures included muscle mass, muscle strenght, sarcopenia, frailty, functional capacity and physical performance and will be assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months follow-up.

The primary aim of this double-blind randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of an accelerated rehabilitation protocol on knee joint function and quality of life in individuals undergoing TKA compared to conventional rehabilitation in Dali, Yunan, China. The study will include patients aged 50-80 years who are scheduled for primary unilateral TKA. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an accelerated rehabilitation group or conventional rehabilitation group. The primary outcomes will include knee joint function, assessed using the KOOS and quality of life measures using the SF-36 surveys. The study will follow participants for 6 months post-surgery to assess longer-term outcomes. This study will not include individuals undergoing revision TKA or those with severe comorbid conditions. The results will provide critical insights into the role of accelerated rehabilitation in improving post-operative recovery, functional outcomes, and overall quality of life for TKA patients.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a frequently performed procedure. Adequate pain management is an important feature, especially for fast-track and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The multimodal approach, including single shot or continuous nerve blocks with catheters and spinal or epidural morphine, is a stablished strategy. Although the administration of intrathecal morphine (IM) has been shown to significantly reduce pain scores, it is not free of adverse effects. Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is possible and might increase the risk of periprosthetic infection. The purpose of this study is to compare patients undergoing rTKAS under spinal anesthesia with IM to patients undergoing the same procedure, under the same anesthetic technique, but with no IM, for POUR and postoperative pain related outcomes. All patients will have single shot and continuous adductor canal block (CACB) and single shot IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) block. The hypothesis is that postoperative pain control is comparable between the groups, with lower incidence of POUR in patients with no IM given.

The goal of this study is to determine whether undergoing bariatric surgery before knee replacement leads to better outcomes compared to undergoing knee replacement before bariatric surgery. Our secondary goal is to compare complication rates between these groups to determine if there is a difference based on the order of the two procedures. Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups, with each undergoing both procedures but in opposite order. Quality of life will be assessed via questionnaires before and between each procedure, and rates of complications will also be documented to compare their rates between groups.