Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

2

Review clinical trials related to Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Covered vs Bare Metal Stents for Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis is the most common cause of secondary hypertension , increasing the risk of cardiovascular and kidney-related complications. Some small-scale studies have suggested that covered stents are effective and safe, but high-quality evidence from large-scale studies in atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis remains limited. This study aims to evaluate whether covered stents are more effective than bare metal stents in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a covered stent or a bare metal stent. Patients will be followed for 12 months to assess Changes in eGFR, 24-hour systolic blood pressure, and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months were compared among the groups. The results of this study may help improve treatment strategies and guide the selection of stent type for patients with this condition.

Participants needed: 150
Trial details
Age: 40-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalUpdated: May 4, 2026Locations: 15
Eligibility criteria

1) Renal artery diameter stenosis ≥60%; 2) Office systolic blood pressure ≥ 160...

1) Unstable clinical condition rendering the patient intolerant to revascularisa...

Status: Not yet recruiting

FFR-Guided Revascularization in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis

For patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, the results of randomized controlled trials published in recent years have failed to demonstrate that renal artery stenting is superior to optimal medical therapy. However, these studies still have limitations. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been extensively studied in coronary artery disease, and it has been established that FFR-guided revascularization is superior to both angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and medical therapy alone. Whether FFR can guide interventional treatment in patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension is currently a hot topic in the field of renal artery stenosis research. Eligible patients meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled. Pharmacologically induced FFR values were measured as the baseline. Patients with FFR ≥ 0.8 were randomly assigned to either the medical therapy group or the stenting group, while patients with FFR \< 0.8 underwent stent implantation. Changes in eGFR, 24-hour systolic blood pressure, and 24-hour diastolic blood pressure from baseline to 12 months were compared among the groups.

Participants needed: 300
Trial details
Age: 40-80Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalUpdated: Apr 30, 2026Locations: 20
Eligibility criteria

Renal artery diameter stenosis ≥60%; [+3]

Unstable clinical condition rendering the patient intolerant to revascularisatio... [+6]