Atrial Fibrillation New Onset

The START-POAF pilot study is a prospective, open-label two-arm, randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes (PROBE). This pilot study will assess Atrial Fibrillation (AF) recurrence and burden in patients with new-onset AF following cardiac surgery.

To validate the prognostic importance of the burden of new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in a prospectively designed hospital-based registry. To characterize those factors that contribute to the progression of post-MI NOAF burden. To establish a prediction model for the risk stratification of patients with NOAF complicating AMI. To explore the clinical usefulness of NOAF burden in guiding the anticoagulation therapy among patients with post-MI NOAF.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder worldwide. Globally, there are 37.5 million people with AF. AF increases the risk of death, heart failure, and stroke, which severely affect patients and also lead to high healthcare costs. Around 25% of all strokes are caused by AF, and patients with stroke due to AF tend to have a higher risk of death and more disability compared to stroke patients without AF. Stroke prevention is, therefore, an important part of AF treatment, in which blood thinning medication has an important role. However, blood thinners increase the risk of bleeding. Therefore, it is important to divide patients with AF into different risk groups, known as risk assessment, to figure out who will benefit the most from blood thinners. To be able to divide patients into different risk groups, various stroke risk assessment tools have been developed, such as the CHA2DS2-VASc score and the ABC-stroke score. The most commonly used tool is the CHA2DS2-VASc score, including only clinical risk factors, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, etc. The ABC-stroke score, which includes blood markers of heart function, has been proven to outperform the CHA2DS2-VASc score in terms of predicting stroke in AF patients. However, the CHA2DS2-VASc score remains the primary stroke risk assessment tool for AF patients in current guidelines. After looking at the different risk factors, patients are divided into three groups: low, intermediate, and high risk. High-risk patients must take blood-thinning medication for life, while low-risk patients do not need it. In the medium-risk group, it remains uncertain whether blood thinners should be given or not. Despite the broad use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, the score itself has limitations. The score does not include important factors, such as the duration of AF, the size and function of the upper heart chambers, as well as the stiffness of the heart, and markers of blood clotting, which are proven markers of a state that inceases the risk of blood clots. Furthermore, the CHA2DS2-VASc score does not consider whether heart failure, high blood pressure, and diabetes are well-controlled or not, which could lead to overuse of blood thinners. Therefore, the current risk assessment tools for patients with AF are incomplete, and improvements are needed. Overall hypothesis: Overall hypothesis is that the different components of the CHA2DS2-VASc score and ABC-stroke score affect blood clotting markers differently, depending on whether conditions like heart failure, high blood pressure, and diabetes (modifiable risk factors) are well-controlled or not. Investigators also expect to see differences in blood clotting markers across different stroke risk groups (low, intermediate, and high risk, based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score and ABC-stroke score) in AF patients who have not yet started blood thinning medication. Furthermore, investigators believe that the duration of AF, the size/function of the upper heart chambers, as well as the stiffness of the heart, can reflect an increased risk of blood clots in AF patients. Overall goal of the study: The overall goal of the study is to help improve the current tools used to assess the risk of stroke in patients with newly diagnosed AF. This will be done by adding more factors to the current risk assessment tools that reflect an increased risk of stroke, such as the burden of AF, the size/function of the heart's upper chambers, as well as the stiffness of the heart, and using biomarkers that show the blood's ability to clot as a substitute measure for stroke risk. Methods: The study is a cross-sectional, single-center observational study and will take place at Esbjerg Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, involving collaboration between the Unit for Thrombosis Research, Department of Clinical Diagnostics and the Department of Cardiology. The study population will consist of 150 participants with newly diagnosed AF. The participants must not be taking a specific type of blood thinner, called anticoagulant therapy (OAC-therapy), before being included in the study. The participants will be recruited with the help of the general practitioners (GPs). The general practitioners will be thoroughly informed about the study and the importance of waiting to start OAC-therapy until the participants have been seen at the cardiology outpatient clinic. The participants will be scheduled for a blood test, an ultrasound of the heart (echocardiography), and a 7-day heart rhythm monitoring within 4 days after their first meeting with the GP.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm problem in the adult population. There is a five-fold increase in stroke risk in patients with AF. Whilst there has been considerable advances in AF management including improvement in ablation therapy, preventing AF remains an unmet need. One promising avenue is a group of medications called Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which has been studied in people with diabetes, kidney disease and weak heart muscle. These medicines were consistently found to lower the risk of developing AF. This can be promising for patients who have suffered a stroke for unclear reasons, where a significant proportion are subsequently found to have short periods of AF. Often prior to AF development, patients may have changes in the structure or function of the top chambers of their heart (the atria). This may provide a useful marker for us to understand whether SGLT2i impacts AF risk. Aim of research study: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of the drug empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, prevents changes in the left atrium associated with future AF development. Using advanced imaging techniques and continuous rhyth monitoring we intend to study the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on left atrial function and arrhythmia occurence. Study design: Patients who are undergoing an implantable loop recorder insertion, to detect AF following a stroke, will be invited for participation. Eligible consenting patients will have a baseline assessment with echocardiography, electrocardiogram and anthropometric measures. They will then be randomised to receive either the SGLT2i alongside usual stroke care for 6 months, or usual stroke care alone. All patients will be monitored remotely via their loop recorder, and will undergo repeat electrocardiogpahic, echocardiographic and anthropometric assessment at 6 months. This way, we aim to investigate whether the SGLT2 inhibitor causes changes in atrial parameters that may be associated with future AF development.

The purpose of the Long term Evaluation of Cardiac Arrhythmias after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (LOCATE) Registry is to perform long-term ambulatory monitoring of patients with severe aortic stenosis who undergo trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and develop new onset conduction system abnormalities post-procedure that do not require urgent permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. The primary objectives of this study are to assess the incidence of late onset heart block necessitating PPM implantation and to evaluate the incidence of new onset atrial fibrillation (AF) following TAVI. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the long-term cardiac health of TAVI patients and inform the development of improved treatment strategies for aortic stenosis patients with conduction system abnormalities.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in adults. Due to the asymptomatic and paroxysmal nature (randomly and shortly occurring of atrial fibrillation, and can therefore remain unnoticed) of atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke five fold if left untreated. Screening in old populations above age 65 years is helpful to find more atrial fibrillation cases. However, screening for atrial fibrillation is not well implemented in China. Thus, this project aims to promote atrial fibrillation screening in primary care centers in China. We will develop an intervention program (SEARCH-AF) and examine the effects (including the clinical effects and implementation effects) of program.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting more than 3% of the adult population. The symptoms of atrial fibrillation can range from asymptomatic to debilitating. It can be permanent in its nature, but also paroxysmal with only short bursts of atrial fibrillation randomly occurring and can therefore remain unnoticed. Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke five fold if left untreated. Screening for atrial fibrillation in elderly populations above age 65 years can result in detection of new atrial fibrillation cases ranging from 0,5% new AF with a single time-point ECG, up to 30% AF if an implantable loop recorder is inserted for 3 years. Currently opportunistic screening using pulse palpation, or a single time-point ECG is recommended by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Systematic screening in individuals aged 75 or above, or at a high stroke risk should be considered. Overall, participation in systematic atrial fibrillation screening trials has been shown to be relatively low with almost 50% non-participants. Participants are generally healthier, with higher socioeconomic status, hence the ones who would potentially benefit the most remain absent. Opportunistic screening has shown promising results with higher participation rates and the possibility of better outreach. There is a lack of data from randomized trials on the difference in participation rates in systematic and opportunistic screening approaches when screening with prolonged ECG monitoring.