Breast Cancer (Early Breast Cancer)

This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancer with intermediate-high or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy). The planned duration of treatment in either arm within the study will be 7 years.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether a selected population of women with early-stage, low-risk breast cancer can avoid hormone therapy without increasing their risk of relapse. It will also evaluate the prognosis of these participants compared to participants who received standard treatment with hormone therapy in another study, estimate the risk of specific recurrence, cardiovascular and bone health, and participants' quality of life. All participants will have undergone surgery and possibly radiation therapy, but unlike standard care, they will not receive hormone therapy afterward. Participants will be enrolled for two years and followed for up to five years after the last participant is enrolled in the trial to monitor for long-term cancer recurrence.

This is a Phase III open-label study to assess if camizestrant improves outcomes compared to standard endocrine therapy in patients with ER+/HER2 - early breast cancer with intermediate or high risk for disease recurrence who completed definitive locoregional therapy (with or without chemotherapy) and standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) for at least 2 years and up to 5 years. The planned duration of treatment in either arm of the study is 60 months.

The goal of this observational study is to evaluate cardiac side effects in women with early-stage breast cancer who receive systemic chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2 therapy as part of their standard cancer care. The main questions it aims to answer are: Can changes in Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) on echocardiography detect early cardiac dysfunction before a drop in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) becomes apparent? Are changes in circulating microRNA levels in the blood associated with early cardiac dysfunction during cancer treatment? Does cardiac dysfunction occur more frequently with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy compared to anthracycline-free regimens? Participants already receiving standard chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2 therapy as part of their routine cancer care will undergo echocardiography (LVEF and GLS), provide blood samples for microRNA analysis, and complete quality of life questionnaires at four time points: before treatment (baseline), and at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting treatment.

LUBRECA will evaluate the safety and efficacy of cryoablation with liquid nitrogen to treat cT1cN0 luminal breast cancer diagnosed in postmenopausal women

EndoPredict is a genomic signature used to determine the 10-year risk of recurrence in early HR+/HER2- breast cancers classified as of intermediate risk according to conventional clinical and pathological criteria, and to guide the adjuvant treatment decision: hormone therapy alone or hormone therapy and chemotherapy. Since 2016, french laboratories performing the Endopredict test, included prospectively analyzed tumors in the SiMoSein registry with data collection : age, tumor size, lymph node status, histology, grade, HR and HER2 IHC status, Ki67, EPscore, Epclin score, risk of relapse, absolue benefit from chemotherapy, risk of late relapse The main objectives of the trial are to: Evaluate long-term relapse-free survival and overall survival over a 10-year period in breast cancer patients who underwent EndoPredict® testing according to: * EPclin risk class (low vs. high), * Lymph node status (N0/N1), * Tumor size (pT), * Age groups (\<40 years, 40-49 years, 50-69 years, ≥70 years), * EP score alone. This study provide real-life data to determine the clinical usefulness of this molecular signature in the management of early HR+/HER2- breast cancers. The ultimate goal is to be able to offer therapeutic de-escalation (avoiding chemotherapy) to patients who are reliably assessed as having a low risk of relapse.

This prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of a home-based upper extremity-focused prehabilitation program in women undergoing breast cancer surgery. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either prehabilitation or usual care. Primary outcomes include shoulder range of motion and upper extremity function (DASH score). Secondary outcomes include grip strength, pain, fatigue, disability, anxiety/depression, and lymphedema incidence up to 2 years postoperatively.

Among patients with breast cancer the subgroup of patients with metastases are considered the group of patients with the worst prognosis. Not only regard-ing therapy decisions but also with regard to quality assured healthcare and health economics this entity of patients remains a challenge. Recently, novel advances in breast cancer therapy aim at the targeted therapy of tumor entities and identification of patients, for whom the greatest therapy benefit, and the least side effects are expected. However molecular assessment of the patient and the tumor in the metastatic situation is not performed on a routine basis and in many cases tumor character-istics from the primary tumor are considered reliable enough to make therapy decisions for the metastatic patients. Although molecular reassessment of tu-mor characteristics from tumor material of the metastasis is recommended in national guidelines, only a minority of patients is biopsied, because of the inva-siveness of the procedure, even though biopsy related complications are reported to be rare. With modern analytic methods from blood based biomaterial there seems to be an opportunity to correlate blood based tumor assessments with actual charac-teristics of the tumor. These include expression analysis, tumor mutation analy-sis, tumor gene copy number aberrations and others. One of the main aims of the PRAEGNANT study is therefore to establish an infrastructure for the compre-hensive analysis of tumor and metastatic molecular characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Furthermore, health care related outcomes as well as health economics provide novel approaches for integration of patients in study conduct and health care awareness and are study aims of the PRAEGNANT study.

Cancer continues to be one of the most significant public health issues worldwide. Thanks to early detection, the mortality rate of certain types of cancer has decreased significantly. However, the lack of accessible, low-cost, non-invasive, non-toxic, and easy-to-implement diagnostic methods results in late diagnoses, leading to 1 in every 6 people dying from cancer today. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression and are found both inside cells and in bodily fluids such as blood and urine. Several studies have demonstrated their role in human diseases, especially cancer, where tumors release miRNAs into the bloodstream that can be used as biomarkers for early detection. The research and development team at Oncoliq SAS identified a panel of miRNAs associated with breast cancer, with a detection performance of 82% sensitivity and 83% specificity, validated in exploratory and preliminary confirmatory studies. These results led to the filing of a patent based on liquid biopsy technology. The objective of this protocol is to establish a panel of miRNAs for the early detection of breast cancer using samples from breast cancer patients and a cancer-free control group. Validation of the miRNAs will be carried out through RT-qPCR. This stage constitutes the analytical validation of the biomarkers, with the goal of developing an algorithm capable of classifying individuals with and without breast cancer. In future stages, a pilot clinical trial is planned to evaluate test implementation and clinical validation.

The aim of this clinical trial is to assess the feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted excision (VAE) in the treatment of early breast cancer with Tis (carcinoma in situ) or T1 (maximum tumor diameter ≤2cm) and negative axillary lymph nodes on imaging. The main question it aims to answer is: * After VAE, when undergoing routine breast cancer surgery again, what is the complete resection rate of the lesion in the surgically removed tissue (pathologically confirmed), that is, the false negative rate of VAE? * Which type of breast cancer lesion has the highest complete resection rate? * Is it clear whether VAE can be applied in the treatment of early breast cancer with Tis or T1 and negative axillary lymph nodes on imaging? * Do patients with benign breast nodules who undergo VAE or are recommended for Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) due to limited puncture and are diagnosed with breast cancer need to undergo surgery again? * The incidence of complications of VAE. Participants will: * Single early breast cancer subjects with Tis or T1 and negative axillary lymph nodes on imaging, after being fully informed and signing the informed consent form, enter the trial period after screening and being qualified. * After the subjects are confirmed to be enrolled, VAE biopsy resection is performed first. * Patients clearly diagnosed with breast cancer receive traditional radical mastectomy for breast cancer: Breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy or dissection in the axilla, assessment of whether the lesion has been completely removed based on postoperative pathology, and follow-up is conducted.