Ciprofol

Ciprofol is a novel intravenous anesthetic with a pharmacological profile similar to propofol but with a lower incidence of injection pain, hypotension, and respiratory depression. For pediatric day-case surgeries, laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion without neuromuscular blockers is increasingly preferred. While opioids are often combined with hypnotics to optimize insertion conditions, the optimal bolus dose of ciprofol when co-administered with a standard dose of fentanyl for LMA insertion in children remains unknown. This study aims to determine the 95% effective dose (ED95) of a single intravenous bolus of ciprofol, combined with a fixed dose of fentanyl (1 μg/kg), for successful LMA insertion in children aged 1-12 years during general anesthesia induction.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a key technique for treating pancreatobiliary diseases in the elderly. However, traditional sedative and analgesic regimens (e.g., sufentanil combined with propofol) are associated with a high incidence of respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and delayed recovery in elderly patients. Anricofen is a novel peripherally selective κ-opioid receptor agonist that provides analgesia with minimal central respiratory depression. Ciprofol is a new sedative agent characterized by rapid onset and quick recovery. The combination of these two drugs may offer a safer sedation and analgesia regimen for elderly patients undergoing ERCP. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anricofen combined with ciprofol for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing ERCP, compared with the traditional regimen (sufentanil combined with ciprofol). Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. A total of 141 elderly patients aged 60-90 years with ASA physical status II-III scheduled for elective ERCP will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to three groups: Anricofen 0.3 μg/kg + Ciprofol 1.0 mg/kg, Anricofen 0.5 μg/kg + Ciprofol 1.0 mg/kg, or Sufentanil 0.1 μg/kg + Ciprofol 1.0 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint is the intraoperative pain control success rate (proportion of time with Behavioral Pain Scale \[BPS\] score ≤3 ≥90%). The primary safety endpoint is the incidence of respiratory depression (respiratory rate \<10 breaths/min or SpO₂ \<90% requiring intervention). Secondary outcomes include sedation depth, body movement episodes, recovery time, PONV incidence, and others. Significance: This study aims to provide a sedation and analgesia regimen with lower risk of respiratory depression and faster recovery for elderly patients undergoing ERCP.

The prevention of intraoperative hypotension could reduce postoperative organ injury and mortality, particularly in elderly patients receiving long-term renin-angiotensin system inhibitors. Previous meta-analyses suggest that ciprofol, a novel intravenous anesthetic agent, may provide improved hemodynamic stability compared to propofol; however, its precise effects on perioperative hemodynamics remain unclear. The study will assess whether ciprofol improves perioperative hemodynamic stability in elderly patients receiving renin-angiotensin system inhibitors.

This study compares the automated anesthesia systems for painless abortion (AAS-PA) with traditional anesthesia in painless abortions. It assesses intraoperative indicators (hypoxemia, injection pain, hypotension, hemodynamics, respiratory depression) and postoperative outcomes (nausea, dizziness, recovery time, satisfaction). The AAS-PA group uses AI-adjusted intravenous ciprofol based on real-time vital signs and sedation depth; the traditional group relies on manual anesthesia. The goal is to verify if AAS-PA safely manages sedation, meets painless standards, reduces adverse events, and improves experience, aiding optimized automated protocols.

1. Objective: Primary: Compare the effect of Ciprofol vs Propofol on LVOT VTI at 2 minutes post-injection (T1) in elderly patients (≥65 years). Secondary: Assess hypotension incidence, injection pain, nausea/vomiting, hypoxia (SpO₂≤90%), bradycardia (HR\<50 bpm), sedation success rate, induction/recovery times, procedure duration, drug doses, and patient satisfaction. 2. Design: Single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Group C (Ciprofol):0.2-0.5 mg/kg IV induction (\>30s injection). Group P (Propofol)::1-2 mg/kg IV induction (\>30s injection). Rescue doses allowed (C: 0.1 mg/kg; P: 0.5 mg/kg; max 5 doses/15 min). 3. Participants: N = 120 elderly patients (65-80 years, ASA I-III, BMI 18-30 kg/m²) scheduled for elective painless colonoscopy. Exclusion: Significant cardiorespiratory, hepatic, renal, or neurological disorders; recent MI/unstable angina (≤6 months); NYHA ≥II; drug allergies; recent trial participation. 4. Key Assessments: Primary Endpoint: LVOT VTI (via transthoracic echocardiography, TTE) at T1. Secondary Endpoints: Adverse events (hypotension, pain, nausea/vomiting, hypoxia, bradycardia, body movement, awareness). Sedation success rate, induction/recovery times (MOAA/S scale), procedure time. Drug doses (induction, total, vasoactive agents). Patient satisfaction (5-point scale). LVEF and IVC Collapse Index (TTE at T0, T1, T2). Safety: Vital signs (HR, BP, SpO₂). 5. Statistical Analysis: SPSS 26.0; α=0.05. Methods: t-test, RM-ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square/Fisher's exact, rank-sum tests. This study aims to determine whether Ciprofol provides superior hemodynamic stability (as measured by LVOT VTI) and fewer adverse effects compared to Propofol for sedation in elderly patients undergoing painless colonoscopy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the Ciprofol and Propofol Under IoC1 and IoC2 Monitoring for Adenotonsillectomy Participants will be randomly allocated to two groups: Ciprofol group (Group C) and Propofol group (Group P). For those in Group C: they will be given ciprofol during anesthesia induction and maintenance .For those in Group P: they will be pgiven ciprofol during anesthesia induction and maintenanc This study evaluates ciprofol versus propofol under IoC1/IoC2 guidance in pediatric T\&A, providing evidence for ciprofol's efficacy and safety in pediatric anesthesia.