Endometrial

To find the recommended dose of the combination of avutometinib, defactinib, and everolimus in patients with endometrial cancer that is recurrent and has abnormal RAS activity. The safety and effects of this combination will also be studied.

Alterations in the HER2 gene are involved in the development of cancer. These abnormalities are found at highly variable rates (from approximately 2% to 60%) in cancers of the lung, breast, stomach, bile ducts, salivary glands, colon, endometrium, uterus, bladder, bones, blood, etc. Zanidatamab is an anti-cancer drug that acts on cells with alterations in the HER2 gene. It is used in Europe to treat people with bile duct cancer. However, in various clinical trials, zanidatamab has shown promising activity in a few patients with different cancers that have a HER2 gene alteration. This treatment could therefore be effective in several types of cancer once this gene alteration is detected. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of zanidatamab in patients with cancer in one of the following locations: endometrium, colorectal, head and neck, sarcoma or lung cancer. Efficacy will be measured by the number of patients in whom a reduction in tumour size was observed. All patients included in the study will receive zanidatamab by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Treatment will continue as long as there is a benefit (stabilisation or regression of the disease). During treatment, participants will visit the hospital regularly for medical consultations to: * assess and treat potential adverse effects of zanidatamab. A dose reduction may be applied to improve tolerance. * monitor disease progression using scans and/or MRI, performed every 6 weeks for the first 18 months of treatment and then every 12 weeks. After treatment is stopped (due to intolerance or disease progression), patients will be monitored according to hospital practices until the end of the trial, i.e. for 1 to 4 years, depending on when they were included in the clinical trial.

There are many indications for performing a fecal diversion stoma. In both scheduled and emergency situations, and whatever the context (indication or type of fecal diversion stoma), stomal complications can occur early (10-60%) or late (25%), and may require repeat surgery. The most frequent complications are necrosis, retraction, bleeding, evisceration, occlusion, abscess, hyperflow with hydroelectrolytic consequences, skin lesions, prolapse or eventration. What's more, a temporary stoma can become permanent. The positioning and fabrication of the digestive stoma for fecal diversion must therefore comply with well-defined criteria to reduce the risk of stomal complications and the difficulties of fitting the stoma, and thus improve the autonomy and therefore the quality of life of the ostomate patient. The guide to good stoma therapy practice recommends that the site of the future stoma should be marked out preoperatively. What's more, the psychological impact of a stoma is such that preoperative and regular postoperative education is essential. This identification and initiation of education is carried out by stoma nurses and/or surgeons. The impact of preoperative stoma identification and education on stoma complications, quality of life and patient autonomy has been reported in a few comparative series. The impact of preoperative education on quality of life has also been reported. However, despite this "Evidence Based Medicine", and the guide to good stoma therapy practice, the identification and education of the future fecal diversion stoma are not always carried out preoperatively. Reasons for this may include lack of time, lack of human resources, in the general context of a shrinking public hospital, or in the current context of distancing and dehumanization of the profession, or lack of conviction on the part of practitioners. To this end, the investigators would like to propose a prospective observational study aimed at evaluating the impact of identification and education prior to the performance of a fecal diversion stoma in a programmed situation on the one hand, and an emergency situation on the other. The main objective will be to compare quality of life specifically related to the stoma at 30 days postoperatively with the StomaQOL score, between 2 groups of patients: * unexposed group: no preoperative stoma identification and education * exposed group: preoperative stoma identification and education. This comparison will be stratified according to whether surgery is scheduled or emergency surgery. Total 100 patients : * In scheduled surgery: 30 exposed and 30 unexposed patients * In emergency surgery: 10 exposed and 30 unexposed patients Timeline: Inclusion period: 12 months Follow-up period: 12 months Total duration: 24 months