Flexor Tendon Rupture

Flexor tendon injuries in the thumb occur across all ages and genders. Each year, approximately 400 patients undergo surgery for a flexor tendon injury in Sweden. These injuries are exclusively treated at one of the seven specialized hand surgery clinics, as the surgery is technically demanding, and postoperative rehabilitation is critical, specialized, and requires expertise from hand therapists. To prevent tendon adhesions and stiffness in the thumb or fingers, controlled active motion therapy is usually initiated within a few days after surgery. Studies on finger flexor tendon injuries have shown that early active movement therapy leads to better mobility compared to immobilization. Consequently, early active training is now the standard treatment following flexor tendon repair. However, during postoperative rehabilitation, the repaired flexor tendon may rupture, often necessitating revision surgery. The rupture rate after flexor tendon repair in the thumb is approximately three times higher than in other fingers (10% vs. 3%). While most studies on flexor tendon injuries focus on finger tendons, research on the outcomes of thumb flexor tendon injuries is limited. The biomechanics and anatomy of the thumb's flexor tendon differ significantly from those of finger tendons. The objective of this study is to determine whether the rupture rate following thumb flexor tendon surgery can be reduced by immobilizing the thumb in a cast for four weeks postoperatively, compared to standard early active motion therapy, without negatively affecting joint mobility and thumb strength. Additionally, the study will evaluate patient-reported outcomes one year post-surgery for both rehabilitation regimens (immobilization vs. mobilization). This study is a registry-randomized clinical trial (RRCT) involving five hand surgery clinics in Sweden. Data following randomization between the two rehabilitation protocols will be collected through follow-up in the Swedish National Hand Surgery Quality Registry (HAKIR).

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive therapy (TECAR) on pain and range of motion (ROM) after hand flexor tendon repair.

The goal of this observational study is to compare the use of a screw made of human bone (Shark-Screw®, Surgebright-GmbH) with the metal/Bio-Tenodesis screw (Arthrex) in the treatment of the symptomatic flatfoot using the medializing calcaneus osteotomy with flexor digitorum longus transfer (FDL) in adult patients. The advantage of the human bone screw is that after surgery no hardware removal is necessary. The screw is transformed from the body to normal bone. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can the human bone screw achieve union rates like the metal/Bio-Tenodesis screw? * Is the time to union similar between the different screws? * Is the complication rate similar between the different screws? * Are the activity scores American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) after surgery similar in the compared patient groups? Participants will have * the surgery * follow-ups at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 years. * X-rays are performed at each follow up. * CT-scans are performed after 6 months. * activity scores are collected at the follow up after 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

a randomized controlled trial tends to compare 2 rehabilitation approaches - early passive mobilization (EPM) and controlled active motion (CAM) - that are commonly used in the treatment of post-surgical flexor tendon repair of the hand