GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder)

3

Review clinical trials related to GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder). Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Comparing XEN®-63 Gel Stent and PRESERFLO® MicroShunt

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn whether two minimally invasive bleb-forming glaucoma implants can effectively treat adult patients with open-angle glaucoma who require surgical lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP). Specifically, the study evaluates whether the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt is at least as effective as the XEN®-63 Gel Stent in reducing IOP after surgery.  The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt provide IOP reduction at 12 months that is non-inferior to the XEN®-63 Gel Stent? * How do the two devices compare over 24 months with respect to medication reduction, need for additional glaucoma procedures, complications, and preservation of visual function and ocular structures? Participants will: * Be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the XEN®-63 Gel Stent or the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt during a single glaucoma surgery. * Attend scheduled follow-up visits over 24 months for eye-pressure measurements, vision testing, visual-field testing, OCT imaging, endothelial-cell counts, and safety assessments. * Receive standard postoperative care and report any complications or additional treatments during the study period.

Participants needed: 166
Trial details
Age: 40+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUpdated: Apr 29, 2026Locations: 3
Eligibility criteria

>40 years of age [+5]

An established diagnosis of: Closed-angle glaucoma or Secondary open-angle glauc... [+10]

Status: Recruiting

Preserflo MicroShunt Versus Trabeculectomy

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to learn whether two minimally invasive bleb-forming glaucoma implants can effectively treat adult patients with open-angle glaucoma who require surgical lowering of intraocular pressure (IOP). Specifically, the study evaluates whether the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt is at least as effective as the trabeculectomy in reducing IOP after surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt provide IOP reduction at 12 months that is non-inferior to trabeculectomy? How do these two surgeries compare over 12 months with respect to medication reduction, need for additional glaucoma procedures, complications, and preservation of visual function and ocular structures? Participants will: Be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the trabeculectomy or the PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt during a single glaucoma surgery. Attend scheduled follow-up visits over 12 months for eye-pressure measurements, vision testing, visual-field testing, OCT imaging, endothelial-cell counts, and safety assessments. Receive standard postoperative care and report any complications or additional treatments during the study period.

Participants needed: 100
Trial details
Age: 21+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Medical University of BialystokUpdated: Mar 27, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

An established diagnosis of: Primary open angle glaucoma, Normal tension glaucom... [+4]

An established diagnosis of: Closed-angle glaucoma or Secondary open-angle glauc... [+10]

Status: Not yet recruiting

Comparison of Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction in Mild to Moderate Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery With EDOF Versus Monofocal IOLs

Cataract is the leading cause of reversible vision loss, while glaucoma remains the primary cause of irreversible blindness, often impairing contrast sensitivity (CS), glare tolerance, and dark adaptation. These visual challenges are particularly relevant when selecting intraocular lenses (IOLs) for glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. Monofocal IOLs are the safest and most commonly used option for glaucoma patients due to their optical simplicity and low incidence of photic phenomena, though they do not provide spectacle independence for near or intermediate vision. Multifocal IOLs (MFIOLs), while offering greater spectacle independence, are relatively contraindicated in glaucoma due to increased visual disturbances like glare and halos. Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOLs offer an intermediate solution, using advanced optics to provide a continuous range of vision and fewer photic disturbances than MFIOLs. EDOF lenses have demonstrated good uncorrected distance and intermediate visual acuity in patients with mild to moderate glaucoma, with promising CS outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, findings on CS performance remain inconsistent across studies. Given these considerations, this study seeks to determine whether EDOF IOLs can be a viable alternative to monofocal lenses in glaucoma patients, potentially expanding their options for spectacle independence without compromising visual quality. The trial, conducted at OMIQ (Barcelona), will directly compare an EDOF IOL and a monofocal IOL made from the same material to assess their effects on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and photic phenomena in this specific patient population.

Participants needed: 74
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: OMIQ ResearchUpdated: Feb 27, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Patients of any sex aged 18 years or older willing to participate and sign the i... [+7]

Patients with uncontrolled glaucoma, defined as those with an IOP ≥21 mm Hg desp... [+7]