Impulsivity

7

Review clinical trials related to Impulsivity. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Shaping Tolerance for Delayed Rewards

Deficits in self-control are of major public health relevance as they contribute to several negative outcomes for both individuals and society. For children, developing self-control is a critically important step toward success in academic settings and social relationships, yet there are few non-pharmacological approaches that have been successful in increasing self-control. We found in our earlier studies that self-control can be increased in preschool-aged children with high impulsivity by using games in which they practice gradually increasing wait-time for larger, more delayed rewards. We are performing this current study to test if this training to increase self-control can be increased using mobile app technology, with computerized game time being used as a reward.

Participants needed: 50
Trial details
Age: 3-6Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of California, DavisUpdated: Jun 4, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Age 3-6 years [+3]

Children with autism spectrum disorder and/or intellectual disability (by parent...

Status: Recruiting

Intensive-neurofeedback Protocol for Children With ADHD: A Proof-of-concept Study Comparing iAPF-personalized and Standard Theta-beta-ratio Training

The first aim of this clinical trial is to test the feasibility and signal validity of a new approach to neurofeedback training (NF) using intensive EEG-based theta-beta NF for children with ADHD in the context of NF camps during school holidays. The second aim is to compare the efficacy of two neurofeedback protocols in reducing ADHD symptoms. Previous study results highlight that children with ADHD frequently show increased Theta-Beta-Ratios (TBR) in the qEEG, probably associated with attention difficulties, which may be ameliorated following neurofeedback training. However, the current state of research shows heterogenous findings regarding the efficacy of standard TBR NF for children with ADHD. Further study results suggest that personalized NF training protocols, based on the individual alpha peak frequency (iAPF), may be more effective in reducing ADHD symptoms than standardized ones. Therefore, in this proof-of-concept study of children with ADHD a standard TBR NF protocol is compared with an iAPF-personalized TBR NF (iAPF-TBR NF) protocol (based on the previously obtained iAPF). The study is designed as a randomized controlled intervention trial (RCT) with three assessment points (pre \[T1\], post \[T2\] and 6-month follow-up \[T3\]). Primary endpoints include the reduction of ADHD symptoms assessed by parent-, teacher- and self-report questionnaires. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that NF training is associated with better performance in a sustained attention and executive function test and a reduced TBR in qEEG, particularly following iAPF-TBR NF. The main questions are: * Is it feasible to train groups of up to 12 children with two sessions NF per day for an eight-day-period during their school holidays? * Does iAPF-TBR NF provide a valid neuromodulatory signal compared to the standard-TBR-NF protocol? Do the frequency boundaries demonstrate spectral stability across the 16 training sessions? * Does the personalized iAPF-TBR NF training reduce ADHD symptoms measured immediately after the training more than standard-TBR-NF training? (comparison T2-T1) * Does the personalized iAPF-TBR NF training reduce ADHD symptoms measured 6 months after the NF training more than standard TBR-NF training? (comparison T3-T1) * Does the reduction in ADHD symptoms measured immediately after the NF-training persist until the 6-month follow-up? Do possible differences between iAPF-TBR NF training and standard TBR NF training remain? (comparison T3-T2) Post-hoc analyses of the courses are carried out. In addition, selectivity analyses will be carried out for clinical subgroups (e.g. different ADHD profiles)

Participants needed: 40
Trial details
Age: 6-13Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Bielefeld UniversityUpdated: May 19, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Children aged 6-13 years. Confirmed ADHD diagnosis (ICD 10: F90.0, F90.1, or F98... [+1]

Children with neurological disorders (e.g., Epilepsy) [+3]

Status: Not yet recruiting

A Scalable Trans Diagnostic Intervention Targeting Adolescent Agency Supported by Conversational AI (AGENCIA)

The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether AGENCIA, a brief psychological program supported by digital technology and artificial intelligence, can help reduce emotional and behavioral difficulties in adolescents aged 12 to 18. These difficulties may include irritability, impulsive behaviors, conflicts at home or at school, or difficulties in managing intense emotions. The study also aims to determine whether the effects are similar across adolescents with different symptom profiles or neurodevelopmental characteristics. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: AGENCIA Digital: a self-guided online version completed at home. AGENCIA in-person with a digital assistant: a clinician-delivered version supported by an interactive digital assistant to guide the exercises. Digital psychoeducation (control): a self-guided online program providing general information about adolescent well-being. The main research questions are: Does AGENCIA reduce overall emotional and behavioral difficulties? Does the program improve functioning, family accommodation, and personal agency (a young person's sense of being able to act and make changes)? Are the effects similar across adolescents with different profiles or neurodevelopmental characteristics? Participants will: * Complete three structured sessions depending on their assigned group. * Complete brief online questionnaires at baseline (T0), immediately after the sessions (T1), and at 1-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) follow-ups. * Receive brief phone calls during follow-ups to support questionnaire completion. A total of 465 adolescents will take part in the study. Participation is voluntary and does not replace usual clinical care. The study does not involve medication or invasive procedures, and all digital tools operate within secure institutional systems.

Participants needed: 465
Trial details
Age: 12-18Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en SevillaUpdated: Apr 30, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Adolescents aged 12 to 18 years at enrollment. [+5]

Acute clinical risk at pre-screening or screening (e.g., imminent self-harm risk... [+4]

Status: Recruiting

Frontal iTBS for Impulsivity and Suicidal Ideation in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

The investigators hope to develop a treatment for suicidal ideation (SI), impulsivity and functional impairments (such as difficulties in social and work settings) that occur after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). These conditions have been shown to be linked. The investigators are using a high-powered magnetic pulse, called intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the head to see if it can improve these symptoms. The high-powered magnetic pulse causes certain cells in the brain to activate, which seems to strengthen connections between parts of the brain. The purpose of this research is to gather early information on the safety and effectiveness of iTBS provided to the front of the head for impulsivity, SI and functional deficits after mTBI. The investigators plan to use the data collected in this study to develop larger studies in the future. iTBS is FDA approved, but not for these specific symptoms, or in the specific location the investigators are placing it. The investigators are testing to see if its effective for the above conditions when applied to the front of the head.

Participants needed: 55
Trial details
Phase: Phase 1Age: 22-65Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUpdated: Apr 14, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

22-65 years of age [+4]

Has contraindications to iTBS (i.e., epilepsy) [+9]

Status: Recruiting

Interaction Between Atypical Work Schedules and/or Idel Time at Work on At-risk Gambling Practices

At-risk gambling causes individual and social harm, influenced by environmental, psychological, and socioeconomic factors. In France, 5% of adult gamblers show at-risk gambling practices. Atypical work schedules and idle time at work could increase this risk, but few studies have explored this. These working conditions impact the mental and cognitive health of workers, potentially contributing to at-risk gambling, especially during periods of idle time The study authors wish to explore the links between atypical work schedules, idle time at work, and at-risk gambling practices, considering social norms and individual vulnerabilities.

Participants needed: 25
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUpdated: Feb 19, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Living with current or remission gambling, as assessed using the Problem Gamblin... [+2]

Patient in an exclusion period determined by another study [+1]

Status: Recruiting

Effects of CBT-I on Impulsivity and Risk Taking in Youths With Insomnia

Insomnia is prevalent in adolescents. Impulsive behaviours and excessive risk-taking have been linked to the manifestation of psychopathology in youths. Previous research based on behavioural and neurophysiological measures has found that individuals with insomnia demonstrated impaired inhibitory control, which is associated with detrimental outcomes such as substance abuse and self-harm. Existing evidence has shown some positive effects of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) on insomnia symptoms and daytime functioning in youths. Given the link between insomnia and impulsivity reported in previous research, and sleep as a highly modifiable factor, we are conducting this randomised controlled trial to examine the impact of CBT-I in improving impulsivity and risk-taking in youth with insomnia.

Participants needed: 124
Trial details
Age: 12-24Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: The University of Hong KongUpdated: Feb 10, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Chinese aged 12-24 years old [+3]

A current diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence; a current or past history... [+7]

Status: Recruiting

Combined Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Cognitive Training and Decision-making

This study aims to (i) assess the effects of combined tDCS and cognitive training on decision-making on a trained task (Iowa Gambling Task; IGT); and (ii) test generalization to a closely related cognitive domain, namely motor impulsivity. It is hypothesized that combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training will result in more advantageous decisions and better impulse control than combined sham tDCS and cognitive training.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18-40Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Dr. Najat KhalifaUpdated: Aug 8, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Consenting volunteers aged between 18 and 40.

Individuals with epilepsy, other neurological conditions and history of signific... [+1]