Intertransverse Process Block

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block- related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITP) and the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing Robotic Colorectal Surgery. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related and systemic side effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient and surgeon satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, and quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incedence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesicefficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block- related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Subcostal External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB) and the Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block (TAPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. The primary outcome is the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score within the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include total opioid consumption, requirement for rescue analgesia, block-related complications and adverse effects (hematoma, pneumothorax, local anesthetic systemic complications, vascular puncture, and infection), patient satisfaction assessed using a Likert scale, quality of recovery assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of benign gallbladder diseases; however, despite its minimally invasive nature, a significant proportion of patients experience substantial early postoperative pain, which impacts patient comfort and the duration of hospital stay. The current PROSPECT review and previous studies emphasize that this pain is multifactorial-comprising somatic, visceral, and phrenic nerve-mediated shoulder-tip components-and therefore advocate for an opioid-sparing multimodal analgesic approach. Within this framework, first-line recommendations include paracetamol, NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors, dexamethasone, and local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical site and/or intraperitoneal cavity, alongside appropriate regional blocks; opioids should be reserved solely for rescue analgesia. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia blocks are increasingly utilized for acute visceral pain conditions, such as renal colic. The Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is an interfacial block performed in the thoracic paraspinal region, and it is hypothesized that its extensive spread may influence somatic and, to some extent, visceral pain pathways. Nevertheless, anatomical and clinical studies report inconsistent effects of ESPB on visceral pain, noting that local anesthetics may not consistently reach the paravertebral space, thereby leading to variable block efficacy. Consequently, the Intertransverse Process Block (ITPB), which targets a plane anatomically closer to the paravertebral space, has been described in recent years as an alternative technique. ITPB is performed by injecting local anesthetic into the interfacial space adjacent to the retro-superior costotransverse ligament; it is reported to carry a low risk of complications as it does not require direct orientation toward the pleura or neuraxial structures. Clinical trials indicate that ITPB provides analgesic efficacy comparable to paravertebral blocks in both thoracic and abdominal surgeries and reduces opioid consumption. Furthermore, anatomical studies suggest that the probability of local anesthetic spread into the paravertebral space is higher with ITPB than with ESPB. However, a randomized controlled trial comparing ESPB and ITPB in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is currently lacking in the literature. Therefore, the present study was designed to address this gap.

This prospective, randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial will investigate the effectiveness of the intertransverse process block (ITPB) for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy with unilateral lobectomy. The study will be conducted at a single tertiary center in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided ITPB with 0.5% bupivacaine or placebo (normal saline) prepared in identical syringes to ensure allocation concealment. The block will be performed by an experienced anesthesiologist immediately after surgery and before emergence from anesthesia. Both groups will receive standardized general anesthesia, multimodal perioperative analgesia, and postoperative intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). The trial aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effect of ITPB while maintaining safety and adherence to routine clinical practice. Outcomes will include postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, rescue analgesia requirement, and adverse events.

The study aims to assess the analgesic efficacy of the ITPB at the retro-SCTL space in patients undergoing major open hepatectomy surgery. This is assessed by: Primary Objective: Primary outcome measure: ● Assessing the quality of recovery 15 (QoR15) score at 24 and 48 hours Secondary outcome measure: * Number of anaesthetic and hypoesthetic dermatomes on the ventral and dorsal aspect of the thorax on both the sides at 30 minutes of block completion and during the post anaesthetic room (PACU) discharge * Assessing the 24-hour area under the curve of postoperative pain numerical rating score (NRS, 0-10) at rest and deep breathing or upon use of triflow. * Assessing the amount of postoperative morphine (mg) equivalent consumption at 24 and 48 hours * Time to discharge from High dependency unit (HDU) or Intensive care unit (ICU) Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the application of ITPB targeting the retro-SCTL space in patients undergoing open hepatectomy will improve overall quality of recovery and pain score.