Lumbar Spine Surgery

The main goal of this clinical trial is to understand the benefits of remotely delivered Empowered Relief in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. The main question the trial aims to answer is: Does a postoperative behavioral intervention, Empowered Relief, performed early after back surgery have a measurable impact on postoperative outcomes? Additional questions are whether changes in pain catastrophizing are related to improvements in outcomes and whether preoperative pain catastrophizing is a moderator of response to treatment. Researchers will compare remotely delivered Empowered Relief to remotely delivered education to see if Empowered Relief helps patients manage their pain and functional limitations after back surgery. Participants will: * Complete one group session of remotely delivered Empowered Relief or Education after back surgery * Complete surveys before surgery and 3- and 6-months after surgery

This randomized, single-center, single-masked clinical trial aims to compare the immunomodulatory effects of sevoflurane-based inhalational anesthesia and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia in obese patients undergoing elective lumbar instrumentation surgery. Seventy patients will be randomized into two groups: a propofol group and a sevoflurane group. Blood samples will be collected preoperatively, at postoperative 6 hours, and at postoperative 24 hours. Pentraxin-3 and serum amyloid A levels will be evaluated as primary inflammatory biomarkers together with IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, glucose, and complete blood count parameters.

This study aims to evaluate perioperative hemodynamic changes using the inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index in patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery under general anesthesia. The IVC diameter and collapsibility index will be measured using ultrasonography at predefined perioperative time points. Hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate will also be recorded. The study seeks to determine whether the IVC collapsibility index can be used as a non-invasive indicator of intravascular volume status and hemodynamic changes during lumbar spine surgery.

This study aims to compare two different pain management methods in patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. Patients are randomly assigned to receive either an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or intravenous multimodal analgesia. Postoperative pain will be assessed using both clinical pain scores and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), a non-invasive monitoring system that evaluates pain-related responses based on heart rate variability. The goal of this study is to determine which method provides better postoperative pain control.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided Quadro-Iliac Plane Block (QIPB) on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. Lumbar spinal procedures are commonly associated with significant postoperative pain, which may impair early mobilization and increase opioid consumption. In routine clinical practice, QIPB is increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia to improve pain control and reduce opioid-related adverse effects. Adult patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia will be followed according to routine clinical care. Postoperative analgesia will be managed with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using tramadol, with or without the addition of ultrasound-guided QIPB, based on the preference of the attending anesthesiologist. No intervention or treatment assignment will be performed by the investigators. Postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, opioid consumption, need for rescue analgesics, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction will be recorded during the first 24 hours after surgery. The findings of this study are expected to provide further clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of QIPB as part of multimodal analgesia in lumbar spinal surgery.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the BrightPoint Epidural device as the first system to use multispectral reflectometry to find the epidural space in lumbar neuraxial procedures requiring epidural needle. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Is the device a qualitatively effective secondary confirmation of Loss of Resistance? 2. Is the device a qualitatively effective training tool for educating trainees in how to perform lumbar epidurals? Participants will undergo a neuraxial procedure in which the attending anesthesiologist will use the BrightPoint epidural device to form an opinion on its effectiveness in confirming epidural space access.

This study aims to evaluate the affection of symptoms duration on outcomes of lumbar spine surgery.