Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective vs Emergency Cesarean Section

1

Review clinical trials related to Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective vs Emergency Cesarean Section. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Elective vs Emergency Cesarean Section

Cesarean section (CS) rates have increased substantially worldwide and in Egypt, where they now account for the majority of deliveries. Maternal and neonatal outcomes may differ between elective and emergency CS. Emergency cesarean sections are generally associated with higher maternal morbidity, including increased risks of postpartum hemorrhage, infection, blood transfusion, longer operative time, and prolonged hospital stay. Neonatal outcomes following emergency CS may also be less favorable, with higher rates of low Apgar scores, respiratory distress, and NICU admission. However, findings remain inconsistent across studies, highlighting the need for further prospective research to comprehensively compare maternal and fetal outcomes between elective and emergency cesarean deliveries.

Participants needed: 210
Trial details
Age: 18-45Biological sex: FemaleType: ObservationalSponsor: Assiut UniversityUpdated: Jun 16, 2026
Eligibility criteria

1- Pregnant women undergoing cesarean section 2- Singleton pregnancy 3- Gestatio...

1- Multiple pregnancy 2- Known fetal anomalies 3- Intrauterine fetal demise befo...