Midline Catheter

4

Review clinical trials related to Midline Catheter. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Isometric Hand-Grip Exercise for Preventing Thrombosis and Occlusion of Midline Venous Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Trial

evaluate whether hand-grip ball exercises reduce thrombosis and occlusions of Midline catheters in hospitalized patients.

Participants needed: 840
Trial details
Age: 18-70Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University Hospital PadovaUpdated: Jun 17, 2026
Eligibility criteria

Midline catheter insertion for planned intravenous therapy lasting ≥ 7 days. Age...

Pre-existing superficial or deep venous thrombosis of the limb used for the Midl...

Status: Recruiting

Outpatient Midline Catheter in Patients Receiveing Lidocaine Infusion Series.

This study will assess the efficacy, safety and practicality of using midline catheters for repeated intravenous lidocaine infusions in an outpatient pain management setting. Adult patients requiring serial lidocaine infusions for chronic pain will be enrolled and receive treatment through midline catheters over ten sessions. The study will investigate if the midline catheters are a safe and effective option for delivering repeated lidocaine infusions in the outpatient setting, offering a balance between ease of placement, acceptable complication risk and good patients' comfort.

Participants needed: 500
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: ObservationalSponsor: Medical University of WarsawUpdated: Apr 29, 2026Locations: 1Duration: 10 Days
Eligibility criteria

Patients qualified for lidocaine infusion therapy due to the chronic pain [+2]

Lack of patient consent

Status: Not yet recruiting

CVCs Versus Midline Catheters

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if midline catheters can reduce adverse patient outcomes in adult patients requiring a single vasopressor. The main questions the study aims to answer are: * Do midline catheters reduce the rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections as compared to central venous catheters? * Do midline catheters reduce the rates of deep venous thrombosis as compared to central venous catheters? Researchers will compare midline catheters to central venous catheters to see if there is a reduction in these events. Participants will be randomized to the midline catheter group or the central venous catheter group. The catheters will be part of standard of care for vasopressor therapy. The participants will be followed for 30 days.

Participants needed: 100
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Albert Einstein College of MedicineUpdated: Apr 2, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Patients over 18 years of age being treated in the Emergency Department at Jacob... [+5]

Patients in cardiac arrest (prior to achieving ROSC) [+9]

Status: Recruiting

Single Lumen Midline Catheter vs Long Peripheral Intravenous Cather for Difficult Intravenous Access in the ED

Many patients in the emergency department have veins that are difficult to get an intrevenous (IV) catheter into (called "difficult IV access"). These patients may require other methods to obtain access to a vein for administration of the necessary medications. The 2-inch long IV is most commonly used in emergency departments for people with difficulty IV access. Typically, a healthcare worker will use an ultrasound to help to see the veins underneath the skin while inserting the IV into the vein. That is, the ultrasound helps the healthcare worker visualize veins that are deeper in the arm and may not be felt through the skin. Another device that can be used is a 4-inch midline catheter. This device is less commonly used as many emergency departments do not have participants available, but it serves the same purpose as the 2-inch long IVs (that is, to give medicine into the vein and sometimes to take blood). A 4-inch midline catheter is similar to a 2-inch long IV, but has a few differences. First, the 4-inch midline catheter is even longer than the 2-inch long IV. The 4-inch midline catheter is 10-cm (about 4-inches or the size of 4 quarters side-by-side), while the 2-inch long IV is 4.78-cm (nearly 2-inches or two quarters side-by-side). Second, the 4-inch midline catheter is inserted into using a guidewire to help move the catheter in the vein (similar in concept to a train moving along a track), while the 2-inch long IV does not have this guidewire. The guidewire does not hurt and most do not know it is being used. It is just an additional step to help guide the catheter in the vein. The investigators are conducting this research study to determine which catheter is better for patients with difficult IV access: the 4-inch midline catheter or the 2-inch long IV.

Participants needed: 270
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Albany Medical CollegeUpdated: Jan 20, 2026Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

Two failed attempts at landmark based IV or US-guided peripheral vascular access... [+11]

Patients under the age of 18 [+11]