Motor Function

The goal of this clinical trial is to develop and evaluate an Artificial Intelligence Assisted Prehabilitation Program (AI APP) for returning to work and cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with oral cancer (OC). The main questions it aims to answer are: * What kinds of needs are related to returning to work (RTW) in patients with OC from diagnosis to survival that we can incorporate into the development of AI APP to assist this population ? * How is the effect of the AI APP that based on findings from the first question for patients with OC on physical and psychological distress, fear of recurrence, self-efficacy in coping with cancer, communication, motor function, quality of life, and RTW? * How is the effect of the RTW AI prediction model to identify high-risk groups ? And how is the comprehensive cost effectiveness of benefits and quality of life of the AI APP for OC population? Researchers will compare patients without using AI APP to see if the AI APP works to assist with coping physical and psychological distress, communication, motor function, quality of life, and RTW issues for individuals with OC? Participants will: * Be asked to fulfill a structural questionnaire, or engage in a semi-structured one-by-one interview or a focus group to assess their physical, psychological, and social support needs in the first stage. * Be invited to participant the pilot testing of AI APP in the second stage. * Be provided and trained by 3-month AI APP for 3 months or cared as usual in the third stage. * Complete a structural questionnaire and follow up one year, including the baseline (before using the AI app) and at 1-2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months after the baseline. * Engage in one-by-one interview or a focus group to assess user experiences of the AI APP.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test a new shoe device called Flash-Sole. The Flash-Sole is designed to help support the ankle while walking. It was developed by researchers at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. The device uses soft materials and electrical signals to gently assist with foot movement. The main questions this study aims to answer are: * Is the Flash-Sole safe to wear? * Is it comfortable for users? * Does it work as intended to assist walking? This study will include up to 15 healthy adults between the ages of 19 and 45. The Flash-Sole is considered investigational and is not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Participants will: * Complete one visit at the Biomechanics Research Building that lasts about 2 hours * Answer a few health questions to make sure they can join the study * Do short walking trials wearing their own shoes * Wear special shoes with the Flash-Sole device * Walk short distances on a treadmill at a comfortable speed while the device is turned on and off * Wear small, sticky sensors on their legs to measure movement and muscle activity * Wear a safety harness to prevent falls * Complete a short survey about how the shoes felt and how easy they were to use The purpose of this early study is to learn how the device performs and how people feel about wearing it. The results may help guide improvements to the device and inform future studies. This research is not testing whether the device helps people with walking problems yet, but it may lead to that kind of research in the future.

This study is a postmarketing requirement jointly carried out by four NDA holders (Bayer AG, Bracco, GE Healthcare and Guerbet) and the CRO IQVIA. The study aims to create detailed images of the organs and tissue of the human body during x-ray, CT-scan or MRI investigations, doctors are using contrast media (a kind of dye) which can be given to patients by injection into a blood vessel or by mouth. In this study researchers want to find out whether so called gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have an effect on body movement and mental skills when given to participants multiple times within 5 years. The study plans to enroll about 2076 participants suffering from a condition for which they are likely to have at least annually a MRI or another imaging examinations. Only adults up to 65 years will be considered to join this study. During the study duration of 5 years participants will receive annually a MRI or other imaging tests (such as CT-scan, x-ray) and will visit the study doctor at least 7 times for physical examinations, laboratory investigations and tests on body movement and mental skills.

This study aims to evaluate the effect of diving and aquatic exercises on muscle spasticity and motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with rehabilitation in improving upper extremity motor function after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Researchers will evaluate the efficacy and safety of VNS by comparing the improvements of arm motor function post-ICH in the active VNS combined rehabilitation group with that in the sham VNS combined rehabilitation group (actual intensity 0 mA). Participants in this study will undergo a surgical procedure to implant the VNS system and will subsequently recieve a 6 weeks in-clinic therapy, followed by an additional 6 weeks home exercise. During the final 6 weeks, participants will either recieve in-clinic therapy or maintain their home exercise, depending on their assigned group.

Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) is based on the theoretical basis that constraining the unaffected limb following injury of the brain such as stroke can help overcome learned non-use. It comprises of constraint of the unaffected limb, massed tasks practice with the affected limb and a behavioral contract known as the transfer package whereby use of the affected limb is extended to the real-world situations. home-based rehabilitation is likely to be cost-effective, and it may reduce cost for patients in terms of hospital charges and transport fares. However, one of the major problems with the existing home-based CIMT protocols is that, they used number of hours spent carrying out tasks practice as the measure of intensity of practice, and it has been argued that, such method is not clear and it does not reflect the correct intensity of practice.