Nerve Block

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether an ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIP block) can lower the need for opioid pain medicine after breast reduction surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: Does adding an SPSIP block to standard anesthesia and pain treatment lower opioid use during the first 24 hours after surgery? Researchers will compare participants who receive standard anesthesia and pain treatment with participants who receive standard anesthesia and pain treatment plus an SPSIP block. Participants will: * Have planned bilateral breast reduction surgery under general anesthesia * Be randomly assigned to the SPSIP block group or the control group * Receive standard local anesthetic infiltration during surgery and standard pain treatment after surgery * Have their pain score and pain medicine use recorded during the first 24 hours after surgery * Be followed for safety and complications for 30 days after surgery

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new local anesthesia technique can control pain as well as the standard spinal anesthesia for adults having hip endoprosthesis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Is the new local anesthesia technique as effective as standard spinal anesthesia in managing pain during the first two days after surgery? * Does the new technique allow participants to move their leg sooner after the operation? Researchers will compare the new local anesthesia technique (numbing medicine injected directly around the hip joint) to standard spinal anesthesia (a numbing injection in the back) to see if the new technique works just as well for pain control while possibly causing fewer side effects like nausea. Participants who join this study will be randomly placed into one of two groups. One group will receive the standard spinal anesthesia before their surgery. The other group will receive the new local anesthesia technique before their surgery. After the operation, researchers will track the amount of extra pain medicine each participant uses and will check their ability to move their hip, knee, and foot.

The purpose of this study, called a cross-sectional survey, is to interview patients on their experiences of pain and recovery following keyhole shoulder surgery, after receiving a single shot nerve block in addition to a general anesthetic. The researchers would like to explore patients' experiences to see if there are groups of patients who may benefit from insertion of a nerve catheter as compared to a single shot nerve block injection for keyhole shoulder surgery.

This prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy of two local anesthetic regimens for ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block in adult patients undergoing elective distal lower extremity surgery. Eligible participants (ages 18-65, ASA physical status I-III, BMI 18-35 kg/m²) will be randomized into two equal groups of 30. Patients in Group BL will receive a combination of 10 mL 2% lidocaine and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine, while patients in Group B will receive 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine alone, administered via ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block prior to surgery. The primary outcome is the onset time of sensory and motor blockade. Secondary outcomes include block success rate, duration of sensory and motor block, postoperative opioid consumption, pain scores assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, and incidence of rebound pain. The study is conducted at Ataturk University Research Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Erzurum, Turkey.

This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESP) groups to relieve postoperative pain in participants over the age of 18 undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. The main question it aims to answer is: To demonstrate whether PENG block or L-ESP block is more effective in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery based on pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction. Total hip arthroplasties cause severe pain with movement in the postoperative period. After surgery, the movements of the participants are severely restricted, which increases the possibility of complications. In this study, the participants' pain status, VAS score, opioid consumption through patient-controlled analgesia, and patient satisfaction will be measured with a questionnaire for 24 hours at predetermined time points and then compared. Both types of blocks have pain-relieving effects. This study will only investigate which one is more effective in reducing pain, and there will be no deficiency in relieving the pain of the participants.

Effective postoperative pain management remains a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Inadequate analgesia not only compromises patient satisfaction but also impedes early mobilization and rehabilitation, thereby increasing the risk of perioperative complications. Current multimodal analgesic strategies frequently incorporate regional techniques, with the adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block emerging as established modalities that provide motor-sparing analgesia. Despite their widespread adoption, the optimal local anesthetic regimen for these blocks remains undefined. While liposomal bupivacaine has garnered interest for its extended duration of action, its clinical efficacy relative to conventional local anesthetics combined with perineural adjuncts remains a subject of ongoing debate. Specifically, perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have each demonstrated the capacity to prolong the analgesic duration of ropivacaine; however, direct comparative data among these three distinct strategies-liposomal bupivacaine alone versus ropivacaine supplemented with either adjunct-are notably limited. Given the absence of head-to-head randomized trials evaluating these three clinically viable techniques, the optimal approach to maximize analgesic duration while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects remains unclear. This study therefore aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety profiles of liposomal bupivacaine, ropivacaine with perineural dexamethasone, and ropivacaine with perineural dexmedetomidine when administered via ACB and IPACK blocks in patients undergoing TKA.

This study aims to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block and the serratus posterior superior intercostal plane (SPSIP) block, in patients undergoing elective mastectomy surgery. Postoperative pain following mastectomy is a common and significant clinical problem that negatively affects patient comfort, delays mobilization, and may prolong hospital stay. Although systemic analgesics are commonly used, they are associated with adverse effects such as sedation, constipation, and potential dependency. In this randomized clinical study, female patients aged 18-75 years with ASA physical status I-III scheduled for elective mastectomy will be included after obtaining informed consent. Patients will be allocated into two groups to receive either SAP block or SPSIP block under ultrasound guidance prior to surgery. Standardized general anesthesia and perioperative analgesia protocols will be applied to all patients. The primary objective is to compare postoperative pain scores between the two groups using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes include time to first analgesic requirement, total analgesic consumption, intraoperative opioid use, and hemodynamic parameters. By comparing these two interfascial plane blocks, this study aims to identify a more effective analgesic technique that improves postoperative pain control, enhances patient comfort, and facilitates early mobilization following mastectomy.

Background and Purpose: Median sternotomy is the standard surgical approach for cardiac procedures, yet it is associated with significant postoperative pain. Inadequate pain management can lead to pulmonary complications and chronic pain syndromes. While opioids are a cornerstone of multimodal analgesia, their side effects-such as sedation, respiratory depression, and nausea-can delay recovery. Furthermore, neuraxial techniques like epidural analgesia are often avoided in cardiac surgery due to the risks associated with systemic heparinization. This study aims to compare the efficacy of two non-neuraxial regional anesthesia techniques: the combination of Transversus Thoracic Plane Block (TTPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) versus the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB). Study Design and Population: This prospective, randomized study includes 50 patients (ASA I-III, aged 18-80) undergoing elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Patients are randomized into two groups: TTPB + SAPB Group: Patients receive ultrasound-guided blocks targeting the anterior and lateral chest wall. ESPB Group: Patients receive ultrasound-guided blocks targeting the paravertebral and intercostal spaces from a posterior approach. Intervention and Procedures: Following standardized anesthesia induction and invasive monitoring, the respective blocks are performed under ultrasound guidance. Intraoperative hemodynamic data are recorded at key surgical stages (incision, sternotomy, CPB). In the postoperative period in the intensive care unit (ICU), all patients will receive a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol including intravenous (IV) paracetamol and IV tenoxicam. While patients are intubated, pain will be assessed using the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS). If the BPS score is above 3, IV fentanyl will be administered as rescue analgesia. Following extubation, pain levels will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during coughing at specific time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 hours). If the post-extubation VAS score is 4 or higher, intramuscular meperidine will be given as rescue analgesia. Additionally, IV ondansetron will be administered in case of nausea or vomiting. The study will also evaluate the time to extubation, time to clinical transport, and patient/surgeon satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Primary and Secondary Outcomes: The primary objective of this study is to compare postoperative pain intensity between the study groups using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (0-10) and the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) (3-12). Secondary objectives include: Opioid Consumption: Comparison of total intraoperative and postoperative opioid (IV fentanyl and IM meperidine) consumption within the first 24 hours. Recovery Milestones: Measurement of time to extubation, time to first mobilization, and time to clinical transport to the surgical ward. Clinical Satisfaction and Safety: Assessment of patient and surgeon satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale, and monitoring the incidence of opioid-related side effects, specifically postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) requiring ondansetron. Expected Impact: By identifying the most effective regional anesthesia technique (TTPB+SAPB vs. ESPB) in conjunction with a standardized multimodal analgesia protocol (IV paracetamol and tenoxicam), this study seeks to maximize postoperative pain control and patient comfort. The results aim to achieve superior analgesia with lower pain scores, thereby facilitating earlier mobilization, reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and enhancing the overall recovery process for patients undergoing cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. This approach ultimately contributes to the development of more effective, pain-centered recovery protocols in the intensive care unit.

In 2020, a trial demonstrated that a 2-injection technique constitutes the optimal method for the costoclavicular block. This study aims to determine the minimum amount of medication required to achieve a successful double-injection costoclavicular nerve. Block dose assignment will be done using an up-and-down sequential method, called the Biased Coin Design (BCD). The double-injection technique for US-guided costoclavicular block consists in depositing two thirds of the LA volume in the deep compartment (to anesthetize the posterior and medial cords), and one third of the injectate in the superficial compartment (to anesthetize the lateral cord). The ED90 will be calculated using isotonic regression with a 95% confidence interval derived by bootstrapping.

Management of acute post-operative pain has received keen attention in recent years with considerable concurrent advancement in the field. The importance of effective pain relief has long been realised, and acute pain services (APS) are operational in majority of the hospitals in the developed world for decades. Postoperative pain following abdominal surgery if severe enough may cause several side effects as "splinting, hypoventilation, atelectasis, immobility, hypercoagulability, thromboembolic events, vasoconstriction, tachycardia, increased systemic vascular resistance, dysrhythmias and cardiac ischemia in susceptible patients, insomnia, anxiety, feeling of helplessness". Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have been rapidly incorporated into regional anaesthesia practice in recent years as an alternative to neuraxial techniques and involve injection into a tissue plane to provide analgesia in various anatomic areas. External oblique intercostal plane block (EOIPB) is a novel block, which has been described as an important modification of the fascial plane blocks that can consistently involve the upper lateral abdominal walls. The erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a new regional aesthetic technique that can be used to provide analgesia for a variety of surgical procedures or to manage acute or chronic pain. The technique is relatively easy to perform on patients. The ESPB involves injection of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae fascial plane, superficial to the tip of the transverse process of the vertebra and deep to the erector spinae muscle.

Effective perioperative pain management remains a cornerstone in enhancing recovery and improving patient outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This minimally invasive procedure, although less traumatic compared to open surgery, can still lead to significant postoperative pain, particularly in the early hours following the operation. Insufficient pain control may result in delayed mobilization, prolonged hospital stays, and increased opioid consumption, which are associated with adverse side effects and a heightened risk of complications . Regional anesthesia techniques have garnered significant attention for their ability to provide localized, opioid-sparing analgesia, thereby improving postoperative recovery profiles.External Oblique Intercostal Plane Block (EOIP) is a relatively new regional anesthesia technique targeting the intercostal nerves (T7-T11) as they traverse the plane between the external and internal oblique muscles. This block has demonstrated efficacy in controlling postoperative pain for upper abdominal surgeries, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy. By selectively anesthetizing the sensory branches of the thoracoabdominal nerves, the EOIP block provides localized analgesia with minimal motor blockade, making it an ideal choice for early mobilization (Ouchi et al., 2020).Recent advancements in ultrasound-guided techniques have improved the precision and safety of the EOIP block, allowing for consistent blockade of the targeted nerves. Clinical trials have highlighted its ability to reduce the pain significantly in the first 24 hours postoperatively, along with a marked decrease in the need for rescue analgesics. Tranrversus abdominis plane block (TAP) , first described in the early 2000s, has undergone several modifications to improve its efficacy in abdominal surgeries. The subcostal TAP block targets the anterior branches of the lower thoracic nerves (T6-T9) to provide analgesia to the upper abdominal wall. This technique is particularly suited for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, where the pain originates predominantly from the pari0etal peritoneum and abdominal wall incisions.The single puncture technique of Rectus sheath block (RSB) combined with transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) represents a more streamlined approach to abdominal wall analgesia. ultrasonography (US) guidance for peripheral nerve blocks has become more and more popular. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) and US-guided rectus sheath block (RSB) have been utilized in abdominal surgeries and have shown strong analgesic effects. Prior researches has demonstrated that in abdominal surgery, US-guided (TAPB) in conjunction with (RSB) had superior analgesic effects than either (TAPB) or (RSB) alone. Currently, multipoint nerve block procedures are generally applied in clinical practice, but they are difficult and can increase the patient's suffering. A novel method is proposed based on the neuromuscular anatomy and the location of the incisiopn in laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery: US-guided transverse abdominis plane and rectus sheath block one-puncture .

This study will compare three different doses of perineural dexmedetomidine 0.67 mcg/kg, 1 mcg/kg, and 1.33 mcg/kg as adjuvants to local anesthetics for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (ICBs). Our research hypothesis is that 1.33 mcg/kg will provide a 15%-longer duration than 1mcg/kg, which in turn will provide a 15%-longer duration than 0.67 mcg/kg. Since analgesic duration and sensory duration can be influenced by intake of pain medications and surgical trauma to small cutaneous nerves, respectively, we will select motor block duration as the main outcome to better target the action of dexmedetomidine on the brachial plexus.

Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a frequently performed procedure. Adequate pain management is an important feature, especially for fast-track and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs. The multimodal approach, including single shot or continuous nerve blocks with catheters and spinal or epidural morphine, is a stablished strategy. Although the administration of intrathecal morphine (IM) has been shown to significantly reduce pain scores, it is not free of adverse effects. Postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is possible and might increase the risk of periprosthetic infection. The purpose of this study is to compare patients undergoing rTKAS under spinal anesthesia with IM to patients undergoing the same procedure, under the same anesthetic technique, but with no IM, for POUR and postoperative pain related outcomes. All patients will have single shot and continuous adductor canal block (CACB) and single shot IPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) block. The hypothesis is that postoperative pain control is comparable between the groups, with lower incidence of POUR in patients with no IM given.

Lumbar microdiscectomy is a commonly used surgical procedure for treating herniated discs. Effective postoperative analgesia is crucial for early mobilization and functional recovery. Uncontrolled postoperative pain can delay recovery, increase the risk of opioid dependence, and lead to respiratory complications. Although opioid analgesics effectively reduce pain, they can cause side effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, and dependency. Therefore, non-opioid analgesic methods are preferred for patient safety and comfort. Recently, regional anesthesia techniques such as the Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane (TLIP) block and the Quadro Iliac Plane Block have been introduced for postoperative pain management in lumbar surgeries. However, there are not enough studies comparing the superiority of these two methods. Study Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of ultrasound-guided TLIP and Quadro Iliac Plane Blocks on postoperative opioid consumption after lumbar microsurgery. The secondary aim is to compare opioid-related side effects (such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, etc.) and postoperative NRS pain scores between the groups.

Comparison of post-operative pain after total shoulder surgery. The Principle Investigator will be comparing Exparel single shot block to Interscalene catheter

Hip replacement surgery is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in France, with approximately 150,000 procedures per year. Postoperative recovery has significantly improved in recent years, enabling faster rehabilitation. Although generally considered moderately painful, hip replacement surgery can, in some difficult-to-predict cases, lead to severe postoperative pain, requiring high doses of morphine, which may cause side effects and delay recovery. In other surgical procedures, regional anesthesia (nerve blocks) has been successfully used for pain relief. However, its effectiveness after hip replacement surgery has not yet been fully proven. A recent regional anesthesia technique-the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block (SIFIB)-which numbs a significant portion of the nerves around the hip, has recently been developed. When performed in all patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, the benefit of this technique could not be demonstrated. In addition, this technique may lead to transcient muscle blockade, wich also can delay recovery. In order to limit the use of nerve blocks to painful patients, we designed this study where the nerve block is performed only in patients experiencing significant paint after surgery. In conclusion, this study aims to assess the benefits of performing a rescue SIFIB in the recovery room for patients who experience significant postoperative pain after hip replacement surgery. The evaluation will focus on pain relief and ability to walk. No new treatment is being tested. The technique uses a commonly administered local anesthetic to numb the nerves.

The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the effects of local anesthetic diffusion range and sensory block range during retro-SCTLB(retro superior costotransverse ligament space block) and TPVB(thoracic paravertebral block) in patients undergoing CT-guided lung nodule localization. The main issue of the study is to determine the differences in the diffusion range and sensory block range of local anesthetics between the retro-SCTLB and TPVB nerve block methods.

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) has an incidence of 46% in patients after breast cancer surgery, which seriously affects patients' physiological and psychological function, as well as quality of life. Acute pain is an independent risk factor for persistent pain after surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) provided excellent perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery. Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant of local anesthetics prolongs the duration of peripheral nerve block and decreases the requirements of postoperative analgesia. The investigators hypothesize that, for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy, ESPB (with a combination of 0.5% ropivacaine 35 ml and dexmedetomidine 1 microgram/kg) can reduce the occurrence of CPSP. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the impact of ESPB with adjuvant dexmedetomidine on the incidence of CPSP in breast cancer patients after mastectomy. We will also observe the impact of ESPB on long-term survival in these patients.

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia/analgesia techniques (or simply, 'regional blocks') have gained popularity as they can reduce, and sometimes even eliminate, the need for opiate analgesics (and, consequently, their side effects), thereby improving patient safety, reducing length of hospital stay and medical costs, and improving patient satisfaction. However, a major barrier to mainstream uptake of such techniques relates to training. These techniques require the acquisition of new skills under expert guidance, which is often not possible given the daily demands placed upon anesthesiologists. As a result, many opportunities for providing regional blocks may be missed. The purpose of this study is to implement a new real-time 'near remote' guidance method in which trainees who are to perform regional blocks can do so via tele-mentoring under expert guidance. This will be done using a novel technology whereby the ultrasound image is concurrently displayed on an iPad screen (for the block operator/trainee) as well as on the (near remotely supervising) expert mentor's smartphone. Trainees and mentors will use this method to perform various standard of care regional blocks, either in the perioperative or emergency department settings. Participants' opinions of the novel teaching and learning method will be assessed.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the impact of injection duration during fascial plane blocks on block success and analgesic efficacy in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The hypothesis is that shorter injection durations increase injection pressure, potentially limiting local anesthetic spread, while longer durations facilitate broader anesthetic distribution.

LIA is the mainstay of postoperative analgesia in patients having knee arthroplasty. The combination of ACB-iPACK blocks has also been proposed as an effective analgesic modality for total knee arthroplasty. However, whether combining these two modalities yields any important incremental analgesic benefit remains unclear. The investigators hypothesized that the addition of ACB and iPACK blocks to LIA will yield clinically important analgesic benefits compared to LIA alone in patients having total knee arthroplasty.

Regional anaesthesia combined with general anaesthesia has become common in the perioperative management of breast cancer surgery patients. Regional techniques have been recognised to provide excellent post-operative analgesia. It enhances multi-modal analgesia regimes while being opioid sparing, reducing incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and allowing earlier mobilisation/discharge and improving treatment success. Therefore identifying the correct regional anaesthetic technique for this group of patients is important in providing optimum peri-operative care.

In this study participants are aiming to compare triple injection peri-sartorius (TIPS) block versus intravenous analgesia for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroscopy regarding efficacy of pain relief and early ambulation

This research project aims to see if using immersive virtual reality (iVR) is as good as using traditional mannequins to teach medical staff how to perform a specific nerve block called an ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block. This nerve block is important for managing pain in patients with hip fractures, as it can improve recovery, shorten hospital stays, and reduce healthcare costs. Currently, not enough eligible hip fracture patients receive these beneficial nerve blocks. The study will recruit 36 staff and trainees from anesthesiology, emergency medicine, and orthopedic surgery at The Ottawa Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will learn the SIFI block using a newly developed iVR simulator that uses real human anatomy and allows for practice of needling and injecting. The other group will use traditional mannequin-based simulators. All participants will receive educational materials and videos before their training. Their skills will be tested before the training, immediately after, and again one month later using a hybrid simulator (a combination of a mannequin and a soft embalmed human cadaver part). The main thing being measured is their skill level using a standardized scoring system. The study also wants to see if the iVR simulator is well-tolerated by users. The overall goal is to improve care for hip fracture patients through better, more accessible training for medical staff.

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of combined adductor canal block (ACB) with interspace between popliteal artery and the knee capsule (IPACK) versus combined ACB with genicular nerve block (GNB) for providing analgesia in knee arthroplasty. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic efficacy of ACB combined with GNB will be non-inferior to that of ACB combined with IPACK. Additionally, the investigators aim to assess whether the combination of ACB and GNB results in a significantly lower occurrence of sensory or motor block affecting the tibial and common peroneal nerves compared to ACB and IPACK