Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

This is a Phase III open-label, 3-arm, parallel, randomized, controlled trial. The allocation ratio 1:1:1 and outcome assessment are blind to group allocation. Patients will be randomized from 3 arms. Patients will receive VRD extended + ASCT plus ERI or Isatuximab-VRD + ASCT or Isatuximab-VID + ASCT.

This research study is being done to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of elranatamab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone versus the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone for patients with newly diagnosed, transplant ineligible/deferred multiple myeloma.

This study is to evaluate the combination of isatuximab, iberdomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma participants who are transplant ineligible or not intended for upfront transplant. The names of the study drugs used in this research study are: isatuximab, iberdomide, bortezomib dexamethasone

The purpose of this Phase 3 study is to evaluate if BRd prolongs progression free survival (PFS) and/or improves minimal residual disease (MRD) negative status compared with DRd in participants with TI-NDMM.

The association between multiple myeloma (MM) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is well known. Indeed, the incidence of VTE is increased in patients with newly diagnosed MM and in patients treated by immunomodulatory drugs in combination with glucocorticoids. Moreover, the clinical outcome of MM is supposed to be correlated to the risk of thrombosis. At the biological level, a number of hemostasis abnormalities participate in increasing VTE incidence. Yet, data on predictive biomarkers linked to VTE are limited.

This is a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, multicenter, phase III study to compare the efficacy and safety of HLX15-IV in combination with Rd (HLX15-IV-Rd) versus DARZALEX® in combination with Rd (D-Rd) in patients with NDMM who are ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Linperlisib combined with the VRD regimen in the treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. The study is divided into a Phase Ib dose exploration phase and a Phase II expansion phase.The Phase Ib dose exploration phase primarily aims to determine the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of Linperlisib based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The Phase II expansion phase involves induction therapy using at least four cycles of Linperlisib at RP2D in combination with the VRD regimen. After completing four cycles of induction therapy, patients eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) will undergo the procedure. For patients whose therapeutic evaluation results in PD (progressive disease) or SD (stable disease), alternative treatment regimens will be considered based on their condition. After successful transplantation, 2-4 cycles of the original induction regimen will be used for consolidation therapy.The primary objective is to evaluate the proportion of patients achieving a very good partial response (VGPR) after four cycles of induction therapy with the Linperlisib combined VRD regimen.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disease of the BM characterized by clonal expansion of plasma cells. Current guidelines recommend that newly diagnosed transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (NDMMTE) shall undergo several cycles of induction, followed by one or two cycles high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transfusion (ASCT). Currently, induction therapy schemes usually consist of an immunomodulator (thalidomide or lenalidomide), a transmembrane glycoprotein CD38 targeting antibody, a proteasome inhibitor, and dexamethasone. The induction therapy is then followed by stem cell mobilization and subsequently one or two cycles of high-dose melphalan-chemotherapy based on the initial cytogenetic findings of the malignant plasma cells and the initial stage of the disease. Essentially, all NDMMTE patients undergo at least one cycle of high-dose chemotherapy, which is associated with high morbidity including acute toxicities like cytopenia, infection, and long-term effects such as myelodysplastic disease (MDS) and secondary malignancies and rarely death. Based on preliminary data and published reports, exposure to high-doses of the genotoxic agent melphalan might render the residual malignant myeloma cells into more aggressive clones, accelerating relapse by potentially altering stroma. Finally, exposure to melphalan is well known to increase the possibility of secondary malignant disease development. In MM patients, high-dose melphalan therapy improves OS and PFS if patients from all risk groups are taken in consideration. Yet, it remains to be answered, whether also low risk patients have an additional benefit from high-dose melphalan therapy or whether for these patients, a less toxic regime would be similarly sufficient with regard to PFS and OS. The challenging question will be whether the effect of melphalan on initial disease control might be outpaced by the negative effects as described above. Hence, the sponsor will explore whether treatment with high-dose melphalan might represent an overtreatment for certain subpopulation myeloma patients. These patients might be adequately treated without need of high-dose melphalan as part of the first line treatment. The sponsor, therefore, proposes to use a personalized approach to evaluate whether patients with a low-risk profile and with a gene expression profile indicating a standard risk of relapse might be sufficiently treated with an intensified induction course without subsequent upfront high-dose melphalan chemotherapy.

This is an open-label, single-arm, prospective study conducted in real-world clinical practice. It aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who switch to carfilzomib-based regimens after bortezomib-based triple-drug regimen intolerance happens.