Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Despite the year-on-year decrease, coronary artery disease (CAD) still remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. With advances in technology and our understanding of cardiac disease, we can now treat CAD using minimally invasive interventional techniques. This has revolutionised treatment for and improved the lives of many patients with CAD. Although trials have assessed various therapeutic strategies in various populations, real-world evidence of intervention and medical treatment among patients with CAD is increasingly recognised as an important part of providing safety and efficacy data and improving the care we provide. Regional heart attack services have improved clinical outcomes following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by facilitating early reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Early discharge after primary PCI is welcomed by patients and increases the efficiency of health care. This data will add to that literature by assessing the characteristics and outcomes of patients with CAD, concentrating on those who are discharged via the early discharge pathway. It will also identify and characterise predictors of outcomes, and improve risk stratification and diagnostic evaluation.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label trial to study whether multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior over culprit-lesion only PCI in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease.

The aim of the study is to compare clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided treatment decision versus fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided treatment decision for non-infarct related artery stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease.

Patients with a suspected myocardial infarction are subdivided into ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively) using an ECG. While patients with STEMI are urgently referred to a cath lab, patients with NSTEMI usually undergo a planned invasive coronary angiography (ICA) anywhere from 24-72 hours after arriving to the hospital. When an invasive coronary angiography can not explain the cause of a myocardial infarction, an MRI of the heart (a CMR) is often done as a follow-up investigation. A growing body of evidence suggests that performing a CMR before the planned ICA can provide an accurate diagnosis and defer the need for an ICA in many of these patients with NSTEMI.

The goal of this observational study is to provide a unique European picture of preventive action by cardiologists, other specialists and primary care physicians looking after patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk and all those with hypertension, dyslipidaemia (including familial hypercholesterolaemia), diabetes and dysglycaemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and determine whether the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention, hypertension, lipids, diabetes and chronic kidney disease are being followed.

Intensive Lipid-Lowering Therapy guided by a cloud-based Software System (CLIMEDO GmbH) improves (European Society of Cardiolofgy/European Atherosclerosis Society) ESC/EAS-guideline recommended LDL-cholesterol target attainment and adherence in patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial (STEMI) and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarctions (NSTEMI).

This prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, objective performance goal (OPG) study is designed to evaluate clinical outcomes after complete revascularization by PCI and imaging guidance (OCT) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease including left anterior descending (LAD) presenting with stable angina, or documented silent ischemia, or non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS).