Platelet-rich Plasma

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a special type of fat graft, made by mixing a person's own fat with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), works to fix breast shape defects after cancer surgery. PRF is a substance made from a person's own blood that is rich in growth factors, which may help the graft survive better. The main questions it aims to answer are: What percentage of the fat graft's volume remains in place 3 months after radiation therapy? What is the safety of this procedure, including its side effects and any impact on cancer returning? Participants will: * Undergo standard breast-conserving surgery to remove the tumor * Have liposuction (fat removal) from their own belly or thighs * Receive a "lipobolus" (their own fat mixed with PRF) placed into the breast defect during the same surgery * Follow up for 12 months with ultrasound scans, physical exams, and questionnaires (BREASTQ) about their satisfaction and quality of life

The French Society of Rheumatology cannot rule on the value of intra-articular injections of PRP due to the lack of hindsight and insufficient data. In fact, the injection protocols are very heterogeneous in terms of preparation method, the presence or not of leukocytes, the number of centrifugations, the volume injected, the ultrasound guidance, which makes it difficult to analyze the literature. The investigator objective is therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of combined injections of PRP and hyaluronic acid.

The investigators would like to study the differences in the quality of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) between two different machines in those with knee osteoarthritis. Knee osteoarthritis means your cartilage has been worn down, and it affects your knee joint. Both machines, the APEX Biologix XCELL PRP System and the Emcyte PurePRP Supraphysiologic Concentrating System, are FDA approved, commercially available, and makes PRP. The investigators will check if the platelets in the PRP have different amounts or work differently. The investigators will also assess participants symptoms after the injection and compare the two different preparation systems.

Endometrial receptivity is a key determinant of success in assisted reproductive technology (ART). A significant proportion of patients experience repeated implantation failure despite euploid embryos and adequate laboratory conditions. Thin endometrium, often defined as ultrasound-measured thickness \<7 mm at embryo transfer, is frequently refractory to estrogen therapy and associated with low implantation and clinical pregnancy rates. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), obtained from autologous blood by double centrifugation, is rich in growth factors capable of stimulating cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tissue regeneration, suggesting potential benefits for endometrial function. Preliminary studies indicate improved endometrial thickness and reproductive outcomes following intrauterine PRP infusion, but standardized protocols and systematic data are lacking. The PMA\_PREPAIRE study is a prospective, single-center, controlled, non-randomized interventional clinical trial conducted at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Asti. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrauterine infusion of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), in association with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), in improving endometrial receptivity and reproductive outcomes in women with thin or refractory endometrium. The study includes a prospective control group treated with standard HRT alone. Eligible women will be treated with standard clinical care, with PRP infusion offered to those with insufficient response to HRT. Inclusion criteria include age 18-45, BMI 18-30 kg/m², history of ≥1 failed embryo transfer, EMT \<5 mm after ≥10 days of HRT, and normal routine lab tests. Exclusion criteria include endometrial disease, recent gynecological infection, and systemic conditions such as thrombocytopenia or coagulopathies. Procedures include standard HRT from cycle days 1-2, serial ultrasound monitoring of endometrial thickness from days 6-8, intrauterine PRP infusion if EMT ≤7 mm (up to three infusions per cycle), embryo transfer once EMT ≥7 mm, and follow-up through pregnancy testing and confirmatory ultrasound. Collected data will be analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired and unpaired comparative analyses, and multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of treatment response and reproductive outcomes (significance level p \< 0.05). A sample size of 34 patients per group was estimated to detect a 1.5 mm difference in endometrial thickness (EMT) with 90% statistical power. Considering an anticipated dropout rate of 15%, a total of 40 patients per group will be enrolled. The study includes: an intervention group consisting of 40 patients treated with HRT plus intrauterine PRP infusion; a prospective control group consisting of 40 patients with refractory thin endometrium treated with standard HRT alone, without PRP.

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether adding platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to fractional CO₂ laser resurfacing improves the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne scars compared with laser alone. Seventy adults aged 18-40 years will be recruited from the Dermatology Department of Gujranwala Medical College Teaching Hospital. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either fractional CO₂ laser combined with topical PRP or fractional CO₂ laser alone, with three treatment sessions delivered four weeks apart. The primary outcome is the change in acne scar severity measured using the Goodman and Baron Quantitative Acne Scar Scale. Secondary outcomes include redness, edema, pain scores, and patient satisfaction assessed using Likert and numeric rating scales. The study is single-blinded, with patients unaware of treatment allocation. PRP will be prepared using a standardized double-spin centrifugation process. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests with a significance level of p \< 0.05. The study aims to determine whether PRP enhances laser efficacy, reduces side effects, and improves patient-reported outcomes.

Diabetic wounds are difficult to heal. Autologous platelets in diabetic patients with renal insufficiency have poor function. Allogeneic platelet plasma has a promising application prospect. Comparing the efficacy and safety differences between allogeneic platelet plasma and autologous platelet plasma is of significant importance and value for the clinical application.

To investigate the efficacy and safety of the application of PRF combined PRP to the for the treatment of GPN.

The definition of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) is the decline of estrogens during menopause results in symptoms and clinical signs from both systems. Estrogen and other hormones production decrease after menopause because the ovaries lose their effectiveness, leading to mucosal atrophy, reduced vaginal moisture, dysuria, urgency, recurrent infection, burning, pruritus and dyspareunia. The treatment included vaginal estrogen supplement, vaginal hyaluronic acid supplement, vaginal laser, platelet rich plasma, etc. Observational cohort study will be used for study design, and questionnaire, pelvic examination, vaginal pap smear with maturation index (MI), vaginal pH, and other methods will be used for evaluation of the effectiveness and side effects.

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational, propensity score matching, cohort, and assessor-blinded study designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PRP injections combined with PRF treatment with PRF alone in patients with IONa who are responded poorly to conventional therapies and are reluctant to receive destructive therapies for seeking a better minimally invasive treatment strategy.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if combined local injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) gel adds clinical efficacy to isolated arthroscopic microfracture in treatment of osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). The interface integration of the injured area will also be assessed via radiographic follow-up. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does arthroscopic microfracture combined with PRP gel injection improve ankle function of participants based on American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Score? * Does arthroscopic microfracture combined with PRP gel injection improve interface integration of the injured cartilage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)? Researchers will compare arthroscopic microfracture with concomitant local injection of PRP gel to isolated microfracture to see if intraoperative PRP gel injection adds clinical efficacy to isolated arthroscopic microfracture in treatment of OLT. Participants will: * Undergo either isolated arthroscopic microfracture or microfracture with intraoperative injection of PRP gel * Receive clinical follow-up 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery and answer scales of ankle function assessment * Take MRI preoperatively and 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery