Post-Stroke Spasticity

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is effective in reducing spasticity in adults with post-stroke spasticity. The primary research question is whether TENS can reduce the severity of spasticity. The effectiveness of TENS will be assessed by comparing spasticity-related outcomes measured before, during, and after the intervention. Participants will first undergo a one-hour baseline monitoring period, during which assessments will be conducted at 10-minute intervals. This will be followed by a 30-minute TENS intervention and a two-hour follow-up period, with assessments performed every 10 minutes. One participant will repeat this protocol once daily for three consecutive days, whereas the remaining three participants will undergo the procedure on a single occasion.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) works to treat spasticity in adult patients with spasticity related to stroke. The main question it aims to answer is: • Does NMES reduces the severity of spasticity? Researchers will compare NMES treatment to baseline and non-stimulation periods to see if NMES works to treat spasticity. Participants will: • first undergo an initial assessment at 10-minute intervals for one hour, followed by 20 minutes of NMES exposure, and subsequent post-treatment assessments at 10-minute intervals for two hours. This daily procedure will be repeated over four days for one patient, and performed only once for the remaining three patients.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in individuals with lower limb spasticity following stroke. Spasticity is a common complication after stroke and can negatively affect walking ability, mobility, and quality of life. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive a standard physiotherapy and rehabilitation program. In addition, the intervention group will receive ESWT applied to the lower limb muscles, while the control group will receive a sham (placebo) ESWT application. The treatment program will be conducted three times per week for four weeks. Clinical assessments will be performed at baseline, after treatment, and during follow-up. The main outcomes of the study include muscle tone (spasticity), walking performance, motor function, and quality of life. The results of this study may help improve rehabilitation strategies and provide evidence for the use of ESWT in stroke patients.

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, frequently resulting in impaired upper limb motor function and spasticity. Although Botulinum Toxin Type A (BoNT-A) is effective in reducing focal spasticity, functional recovery of the upper limb often remains limited without intensive, task-specific rehabilitation. Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES), when synchronized with voluntary movement during Task-Oriented Training, may enhance motor recovery by facilitating muscle activation and neuroplasticity. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether FES combined with Task-Oriented Training is superior to conventional Task-Oriented Training alone in improving upper limb function in post-stroke patients treated with BoNT-A.

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) interventions improve rehabilitation and functional recovery in patients with post-stroke spasticity who meet the other inclusion criteria listed below. Primary question(s) to be answered: Is DBS stimulation effective in treating post-stroke spasticity? What stimulation frequency is most effective in treating post-stroke spasticity? Study participants will: * Undergo surgery to implant a DBS electrode targeting the DRTt (dentate-rubro-thalamic tract ) in close proximity of the dentate nucleus of the cerebellum ipsilateral to the spastic side of the body. * Each patient will then receive an initial stimulation frequency of 130 Hz (arm 1) and will be assigned to a 4- to 6-week rehabilitation program. After this period, the participant will return for a follow-up visit for a clinical evaluation. * The frequency will then be changed to 70Hz (arm 2). Patients who have undergone this change will also undergo a rehabilitation period of 4 to 6 weeks. After this period, they will return to the Clinic for a follow-up evaluation. * The frequency will then be changed to 30Hz (arm 3). Patients who have undergone this change will also undergo a rehabilitation period of 4 to 6 weeks. Researchers will compare the results obtained from patients in each arm to determine the clinical effects of stimulation and whether they are dependent on the stimulation frequency.