Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

The aim is to compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic partial muscle resection（ EPMR） for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NENs), thereby providing guidance for optimizing therapeutic strategies. The investigators retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with R-NENs who underwent endoscopic resection at our center between January 2020 and February 2026. Patients were assigned to either the ESD group or the EPMR group. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared, including the number of lesions, maximum lesion diameter, single-lesion procedure time, postoperative complications, positive margin rate, pathological staging, lymphovascular invasion, and the need for additional therapies.

The aim of this study is evaluating and safety and efficacy between the modified double snare EMR and ESD. It is intended to prove that for rectal neuroendocrine tumors within 1 cm, the complete resection rate of the mDS-EMR is not inferior to that of ESD, but may with shorter operation time, lower complication rate and lower treatment cost.