Revision of a Shoulder Prosthesis

This study takes place in the framework of the PostMarket Clinical Follow-up plan of the HUMELOCK II(r) long cemented humeral stem (shoulder prosthesis) commercialized by FX SHOULDER SOLUTIONS. The included cases will be followed for 10 years after index surgery. Primary objective is the assessment in real life of the revision rate of the shoulder systems at long-term. Secondary objectives are * Revision rate at each post op visit * Range of motion at each post op visit * Constant Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Pain score (VAS) at each post op visit * Radiological assessment of implant positioning through geometrical parameters at each post op visit * Incidence of complications at each post op visit

This study takes place in the framework of the PostMarket Clinical Follow-up plan of the Shoulder Systems commercialized by FX SHOULDER SOLUTIONS. The included cases will be followed for 10 years after index surgery. Primary objective is the assessment in real life of the revision rate of the shoulder systems at long-term. Secondary objectives are * Revision rate at each post op visit * Range of motion at each post op visit * Quick Dash, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Pain scores at each post op visit * Radiological assessment of implant positioning through geometrical parameters at each post op visit * Incidence of complications at each post op visit * Qualitative feedback from surgeons on the instrumentation

The study is a monocentric, retrospective and prospective, non-randomized, non-controlled and consecutive series post-market study. The purpose of this study is to collect long-term data confirming safety, performance and clinical benefits of the Anatomical Shoulder Bipolar System (Implants and Instrumentation) when used as a salvage solution in shoulder replacement. The primary objective is the assessment of safety by analyzing implant survivorship. This will be established by recording the incidence and frequency of revisions, complications and adverse events. Relation of the events to implant, instrumentation and/or procedure should be specified. The secondary objective is the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcome measures (PROMs) as well as radiographic outcomes.