Septic Shock

Septic syndromes are a major although largely under-recognized health care problem and represent the first cause of mortality in intensive care units (ICU). While it has long been known that sepsis deeply perturbs immune homeostasis by inducing a tremendous systemic inflammatory response, novel findings indicate that sepsis indeed initiates a more complex immune response that varies over time, with the concomitant occurrence of both pro- and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. As a resultant, after a short pro-inflammatory phase, septic patients enter a stage of protracted immunosuppression. This is illustrated in those patients by reactivation of dormant viruses (cytomegalovirus (CMV) or Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV)) or infections due to pathogens, including fungi, which are normally pathogenic solely in immunocompromised hosts. These alterations might be directly responsible for worsening outcome in patients who survived initial resuscitation as nearly all immune functions are deeply compromised. New promising therapeutic strategies are currently emerging from those recent findings such as adjunctive immunostimulation for the most immunosuppressed patients. The prerequisite for immunostimulation administration (Interferon gama (IFNg), Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), interleukin 7 (IL-7)) however relies on clinicians' capacity to identify patients who could benefit the most from these immunoadjuvant therapies, as there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions. In this context, the main objectives of IMMUNOSEPSIS 4 study are: 1. to identify the best biomarkers for sepsis-induced immunosuppression 2. to evaluate ex vivo candidate treatments which could rejuvenate immune functions after septic shock

evaluation whether splanchnic Doppler ultrasound indices (SMA resistive index, portal vein pulsatility fraction, hepatic artery resistive index/flow parameters) can: 1. Reflect regional tissue perfusion in septic shock, as correlated with lactate clearance. 2. Associate with organ dysfunction severity and progression (SOFA dynamics). 3. Predict enteral feeding intolerance in ICU patients receiving enteral nutrition

Hemoadsorpion in Patients With Septic Shock: Efficacy and Safety Evaluation. A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. The goal of this clinical trial is the estimation of the efficacy and safety of hemoadsorption procedures (LPS (Lipopolysaccharide) and inflammatory mediators adsorption) in participants with septic shock. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does hemoadsorption decrease the severity of MODS (multiple organ disfunction syndrome)? The study will include participants aged 18 to 80 years with a verified diagnosis of septic shock according to SEPSIS 3 criteria, diagnosed within 12 hours, and a SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score of 9 or more. In addition to Standard of Care (SOC), blood purification, including hemoadsorption, will be used. The minimum waiting time after diagnosis of septic shock and initiation of basic therapy before inclusion of the patient in the study therapy is 4 hours. The choice of procedure will be based on the EAA (Endotoxin Activity Assay) result: * for an EAA level of 0.6-0.9, selective lipopolysaccharide (LPS) adsorption with duration from 2 to 10 hours; * for an EAA level less than 0.6, inflammatory mediator adsorption with duration from 6 to 12 hours. The choice of a specific adsorbers within the LPS and inflammatory mediator adsorption group will be based on randomization. The use of LPS adsorption is planned based on randomization: Toramyxin R-20 or Efferon LPS. The use of inflammatory mediator adsorption is planned based on randomization: Jafron (HA 330) or CytoSorb.

Sepsis remains a leading cause of critical illness worldwide, yet the underlying mechanisms driving its profound and persistent immune dysfunction are incompletely understood. The bone marrow, as the birthplace of all immune cells, plays a central role in orchestrating systemic immune responses. Emerging evidence from animal models suggests that sepsis triggers emergency myeloid-biased hematopoiesis in the bone marrow, characterized by expansion of myeloid progenitors and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) at the expense of lymphoid and erythroid lineages. This bone marrow remodeling precedes peripheral immune alterations and may represent the initiating event of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. However, direct clinical evidence in humans is scarce. This prospective, single-center cohort study aims to systematically characterize bone marrow hematopoietic remodeling in patients with septic shock, compared to critically ill non-septic patients and healthy volunteers, and to determine whether the degree of myeloid lineage bias correlates with disease severity, immunosuppression, and adverse clinical outcomes. This study will enroll three cohorts. Bone marrow aspirates and peripheral blood samples will be collected at 48-72 hours post-enrollment for flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, MDSC subsets, and PD-L1 expression, as well as cytokine profiling and exploratory single-cell transcriptomics. Rectal swabs will be collected synchronously for 16S rRNA sequencing and untargeted metabolomics to investigate the association between gut microbiota, microbial metabolites, and bone marrow myeloid skewing, testing the gut-bone marrow-immune axis hypothesis. Clinical severity (SOFA/APACHE II), secondary infections, and 90-day mortality will be assessed to evaluate prognostic value. By integrating bone marrow hematopoiesis, gut microbiome, and clinical outcomes, this study seeks to provide novel mechanistic insights into sepsis-induced immunoparalysis and identify potential biomarkers or therapeutic targets for immune restoration.

Septic shock is one of the leading causes of death in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in almost 50% of septic patients and is associated with significant mortality. Progression to the last stage (KDIGO stage 3) of AKI is an important step in the disease, as it usually requires initiation of RRT. Renal biomarkers are unable to accurately identify those patients who will progress to severe AKI (KDIGO 3). However, identification of patients at risk of progression to severe AKI could help the clinician to initiate optimal therapy including RRT. A new urine test, the Nephrocheck™ corresponding to the product of the urinary concentrations of 2 markers of renal tubule injury (TIMP2 and IGFBP7) has been validated. The Investigator have already performed two previous studies including septic shock patients (AKICHECK and BIOOCHECK). those previous datas will be reanalysed to examine whether the new urinary biomarkers TIMP2 and IGFBP7 can predict progression within 24 hours and 72 hours from mild and moderate (KDIGO 1 or 2) to severe AKI (KDIGO 3) in patients with septic shock. -All the datas required will be collected from two previous studies (AKICHECK and BIOCHECK) performed in 3 centers: Amiens medical ICU, Melun medico surgical ICU and Montpellier Medical ICU.

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label interventional pilot study aims to evaluate the short-term physiological effects of intravenous anisodamine on sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall parameters in adult patients with septic shock. Eligible patients will have septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, will require norepinephrine support after adequate fluid resuscitation, and will be receiving invasive mechanical ventilation and PiCCO-based hemodynamic monitoring. After baseline assessment, participants will receive intravenous anisodamine according to the study protocol. Anisodamine will be administered as a loading dose of 0.5 mg/kg within 3 minutes, with a minimum dose of 20 mg and a maximum dose of 40 mg, followed by continuous infusion at 0.02-0.1 mg/kg/hour, with a maximum total daily dose of 200 mg. Sublingual microcirculatory variables, including microvascular flow index, perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, and heterogeneity index, as well as vascular-waterfall parameters, including estimated critical closing pressure, estimated mean systemic filling pressure, and the Pcc-Pmsf gradient, will be measured at baseline, 3 hours, and 6 hours after initiation of anisodamine. Systemic hemodynamic, perfusion, vasopressor, PiCCO-derived variables, and safety outcomes will also be collected. The primary objective is to characterize immediate changes in sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall physiology after anisodamine administration and to provide preliminary data for future controlled studies.

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm interventional pilot study aims to evaluate the short-term physiological effects of intravenous esmolol on sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall parameters in adult patients with septic shock. Eligible patients will have septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, persistent tachycardia after initial hemodynamic optimization, ongoing norepinephrine support, adequate volume status or absence of significant fluid responsiveness, and preserved or hyperdynamic cardiac function. Approximately 20 patients will be enrolled from participating intensive care units. After baseline assessment, participants will receive continuous intravenous esmolol infusion according to the study protocol and clinical safety criteria. Sublingual microcirculatory variables, including microvascular flow index, perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, and heterogeneity index, as well as vascular-waterfall parameters, including estimated critical closing pressure, estimated mean systemic filling pressure, and the Pcc-Pmsf gradient, will be measured at baseline and at 3, and 6 hours after esmolol initiation. Additional systemic hemodynamic, perfusion, vasopressor, and safety variables will also be collected. The primary objective is to characterize immediate changes in sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall physiology after esmolol administration and to provide preliminary data for the design of future controlled studies.

This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, pilot physiological study designed to evaluate the effects of intravenous papaverine on sublingual microcirculation and the vascular waterfall phenomenon in adult patients with septic shock. Eligible patients will have septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, require norepinephrine support after adequate fluid resuscitation, and have PiCCO-based hemodynamic monitoring available before papaverine administration. Papaverine will be administered as an intravenous infusion of 30 mg over 10 minutes, followed by a continuous infusion of 2-5 mg/hour. Sublingual microcirculatory variables, vascular-waterfall-related indices, PiCCO-derived hemodynamic variables, macrocirculatory parameters, tissue perfusion variables, vasopressor dose, and safety outcomes will be assessed before and after papaverine administration. The study aims to explore whether papaverine can improve microvascular perfusion and reduce microcirculatory flow impairment in septic shock, and to provide preliminary physiological and safety data for future controlled trials.

This prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label interventional pilot study aims to evaluate the short-term physiological effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall parameters in adult patients with septic shock. Eligible patients will have septic shock according to Sepsis-3 criteria, require norepinephrine support after adequate fluid resuscitation, receive invasive mechanical ventilation, and have PiCCO-based hemodynamic monitoring available before dexmedetomidine initiation. After baseline assessment, participants will receive intravenous dexmedetomidine according to the study protocol. Dexmedetomidine will be administered as a continuous intravenous infusion at 0.2-0.7 µg/kg/hour without a loading dose. The infusion rate may be adjusted according to the target sedation level, hemodynamic status, and adverse effects. Sublingual microcirculatory variables, including microvascular flow index, perfused vessel density, proportion of perfused vessels, and heterogeneity index, as well as vascular-waterfall parameters, including estimated critical closing pressure, estimated mean systemic filling pressure, and the Pcc-Pmsf gradient, will be measured at baseline, 3 hours, and 6 hours after initiation of dexmedetomidine. Systemic hemodynamic, perfusion, vasopressor, PiCCO-derived, sedation-related, and safety outcomes will also be collected. The primary objective is to characterize immediate changes in sublingual microcirculation and vascular-waterfall physiology after dexmedetomidine administration and to provide preliminary data for future controlled studies.

Sepsis is a dysregulated host response to infection that leads to life-threatening organ dysfunction and represents a major healthcare problem. Septic shock is the most severe form, characterized by increased capillary permeability and vasodilation, resulting in hypotension and tissue hypoxia. Early identification and treatment of tissue hypoperfusion are pivotal components of initial resuscitation to limit progression to multiple organ dysfunction and death. The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines recommend guiding initial resuscitation by targeting decreases in serum lactate levels in patients with elevated lactate. However, although elevated lactate levels may reflect tissue hypoxia, serum lactate is not a direct marker of tissue perfusion. Hyperlactatemia may be attributable to mechanisms other than tissue hypoperfusion, such as accelerated aerobic glycolysis driven by excessive β-adrenergic stimulation or impaired clearance (e.g., in liver failure). The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference (CO₂ gap), which is inversely related to cardiac output, has been shown to reflect the adequacy of venous blood flow to remove CO₂ from tissues. The CO₂ gap is closely linked to microcirculatory blood flow during the early resuscitation phase of septic shock and may effectively identify persistent tissue hypoperfusion in shock states. A persistently high CO₂ gap during early resuscitation has been associated with significantly higher 28-day mortality and increased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. Moreover, the CO₂ gap has been shown to respond to changes in cardiac output during inotrope infusion in patients with low blood flow, suggesting that its assessment could be useful for therapeutic adjustments. Therefore, there are compelling arguments to evaluate the usefulness of the CO₂ gap in guiding early resuscitation in patients with septic shock. The investigators postulated that CO₂ gap-guided early resuscitation may be more effective in improving outcomes than lactate-guided resuscitation.

The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial is to provide evidence for adjuvant IgGAM treatment with regard to 1. Improvement of patient outcomes for peritonitis. Improvement in outcome will be determined by scores such as MOF, SOFA and survival. 2. Identification of biomarkers (including immunoglobulin levels, HLA-DR, NF-kB1 and other immunological biomarkers) to identify patient subpopulations that benefit most from IgGAM treatment. These patients will form the basis for a further randomized, controlled, double-blind Phase III trial (RCT) to demonstrate the benefit of this treatment. 3. In addition, these biomarkers could help to guide a targeted, i.e. "personalized", adjuvant therapy with Pentaglobin® (IgGAM) in the indication of peritonitis.

Despite best therapy efforts, sepsis and septic shock are associated with mortality rates of up to 40%. This clinical trial will determine the benefit of exogenous Angiotensin II versus norepinephrine (conventional care) treatment in septic shock patients. This trial will determine whether there are better predictors of septic shock severity. This approach may inform more appropriate treatment regimens and improve outcomes for these patients.

The pulmonary artery catheter (Swan-Ganz) is a standard tool in intensive care for measuring and monitoring cardiac index by thermodilution. The Swan-Ganz IQ™ model also allows continuous estimation of cardiac index through analysis of the right ventricular pressure wave, which could be useful for rapidly assessing changes in cardiac output during volume expansion response tests. However, the concordance between this continuous method and thermodilution remains poorly studied in real clinical conditions and may vary depending on certain clinical situations. This study therefore aims to compare the cardiac index measured by thermodilution with that estimated by right ventricular pressure waveform analysis based on data collected in clinical practice.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation is a severe complication of septic shock, associated with high mortality, whose diagnosis relies on complex scores that are rarely used in practice. Preliminary studies have shown that increased neutrophil fluorescence is associated with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation and could reflect NETosis, a key mechanism of immunothrombosis. This study aims to validate neutrophil fluorescence measured on the SthemA 801 analyzer, alone or integrated into an artificial intelligence model, as an early, reliable, and routinely usable biomarker for the diagnosis of septic Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition caused by the body's dysregulated response to an infection. While corticosteroids are known to help stabilize blood pressure in septic shock, their ability to reduce mortality is still debated. Recent analyses suggest that combining fludrocortisone with hydrocortisone may be more effective at saving lives than hydrocortisone alone. To test this hypothesis, a large, definitive international trial is needed. However, this research proposal is for a smaller pilot study (Phase II) involving 32 critically ill patients. The primary goal of this pilot is to determine the feasibility of conducting the subsequent large-scale trial that would compare hydrocortisone alone against the combination therapy and potentially change medical practice.

The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of propofol-ketamine ("Ketofol") versus propofol monotherapy in geriatric ICU patients. Eligible participants are critically ill elderly patients with a history of cardiac disease who require endotracheal intubation and have not yet received sedation. The investigators focus on a specific population in which geriatric patients have different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and are more prone to side effects than other populations. Primary outcome: Incidence of hemodynamic instability (defined as hypotension requiring vasopressors), measured by mean arterial pressure (MAP) at baseline, during intubation, and post-intubation at 1, 3, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes, then hourly for 24 hours.

This prospective single-center clinical trial aims to evaluate the circulatory and microcirculatory effects of Shenfu Injection in patients with septic shock. The study focuses on the vascular waterfall phenomenon, which describes the relationship between arterial and venous pressures in the microcirculation. Eligible participants with septic shock will receive an intravenous infusion of 100 mL Shenfu Injection (manufactured by China Resources Sanjiu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.). Hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism parameters will be measured before and 3 hours after treatment. The main goal is to determine whether Shenfu Injection influences the vascular waterfall difference, expressed as the gap between critical closure pressure and mean systemic filling pressure. This study will also record changes in cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, blood lactate, venous oxygen saturation, and norepinephrine requirement. Findings will provide preliminary clinical evidence about the role of Shenfu Injection in circulatory regulation during septic shock and help design future randomized controlled studies.

This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of focused ultrasound spleen neuromodulation in patients with septic shock, a life-threatening condition characterized by excessive inflammation and organ dysfunction. The primary objective is to determine whether non-invasive, focused ultrasound stimulation of the spleen can reduce circulating inflammatory cytokine levels in this patient population. Eligibility Criteria: Adults aged 18 years or older Diagnosed with septic shock and admitted to the ICU within 24 hours Expected to require intensive care for at least 72 hours Study Protocol: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Intervention Group: Will receive standard septic shock care plus twice-daily focused ultrasound stimulation over the spleen for five days, using a portable device. Control Group: Will receive standard septic shock care alone. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and Day 5 to measure inflammatory cytokine levels, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-10. Additional assessments will include lymphocyte subpopulations, organ function scores, ICU length of stay, 28-day mortality, and adverse events. Outcome Measures: Primary: Change in levels of inflammatory cytokines on Day 5. Secondary: Changes in organ function (SOFA score), ICU length of stay, 28-day survival, and safety/tolerability of the intervention.

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of cortisol levels and their dynamic changes in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit. Cortisol plays a crucial role in maintaining hemodynamic stability and modulating the inflammatory response during critical illness, and relative adrenal insufficiency has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with sepsis or septic shock will be enrolled and followed prospectively. Serum cortisol levels will be measured, and their association with clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit mortality, 28-day mortality, and 90-day mortality, will be analyzed. In addition, the relationship between cortisol levels and disease severity scores such as SOFA and APACHE, as well as laboratory parameters including inflammatory biomarkers, will be evaluated. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the early identification of high-risk patients and improve prognostic assessment in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock.

The central venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference is used daily in intensive care to establish peripheral tissue hypoperfusion, mainly mediated by a low cardiac index. The partial pressures of gases (oxygen, carbon dioxide) increase in the blood of patients breathing 100% oxygen in hyperbaric conditions. Thus, the validity of this biomarker in situations of acute circulatory failure during a hyperbaric oxygen therapy session has not been established. The objective of the study is therefore to establish the diagnostic performance of the central venous-arterial carbon dioxide tension difference in the diagnosis of a low cardiac index in patients with septic shock undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy for necrotizing fasciitis.

Sepsis is a medical emergency whose prognosis depends on the early identification of patients at risk of septic shock, but the tools available in the Emergency Department remain insufficient. Neutrophils, key players in immunothrombosis, show alterations detectable via cell fluorescence (e.g., NE-SFL), which are strongly correlated with the severity of sepsis and septic DIC. The FLAMES study will evaluate, from the time of admission to the Emergency Department, the relevance of neutrophil fluorescence as an early biomarker of severity, either alone or integrated into an AI model based on the multiparametric data from the SthemA 801, with comparison to the Sysmex XN. It aims to address an unmet clinical need: the immediate stratification of the risk of severe forms of sepsis. Hypothesis: higher initial fluorescence will identify patients at risk of organ failure, septic shock, or DIC.

This is a Phase 2, randomized, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of nogapendekin alfa inbakicept (NAI, ANKTIVA®) in combination with standard of care versus standard of care alone in critically ill adults with sepsis and persistent lymphopenia. The study aims to determine whether NAI can improve 28-day mortality by addressing the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis characterized by persistent lymphopenia (absolute lymphocyte count \<1,000 cells/µL). Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either NAI 1.2 mg subcutaneous injection on Days 3 (or earlier if ALC \<700 cells/µL), Day 14, and potentially Day 21 if ALC remains \<1,000 cells/µL, plus standard of care, or standard of care alone. The study will enroll approximately 50 participants (25 per arm) with persistent lymphopenia.

The aim of the study is to demonstrate that "frail" patients, defined as having a CFS score greater than or equal to 5, and "severely" frail patients, defined as having a CFS score between \[6-7\] as defined by Bagshaw et al (14), constitute an independent risk factor (RF) for mortality. In the same way, as an exploratory study, we will try to find out whether clinical frailty constitutes a risk factor for extending the length of hospital stay, the risk of short/medium-term readmission, as has already been demonstrated for patients admitted to intensive care from all causes (15), or for impaired quality of life. The objective is to have a better understanding of the implications and outcomes associated with pre-hospital frailty in young critically ill patients. This analysis will also help to clarify prognoses and contribute to better decision-making on the intensity and proportionality of care, as well as providing better information and helping to manage the expectations of patients and their families in terms of survival prognosis and subsequent quality of life.

The goal of this observational study is to validate the effectiveness of the new SOFA-2 score in predicting mortality and to determine the current frequency of sepsis in adult patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Turkey. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does the SOFA-2 score accurately predict 30-day mortality in ICU patients? * What is the prevalence of Sepsis-3 and septic shock in Turkish ICUs? Researchers will compare the new SOFA-2 score to the existing SOFA-1 score to see if the new score provides better predictive accuracy for patient outcomes. Participants will not receive any experimental intervention. Researchers will collect data from routine medical care, including: * Vital signs, laboratory test results, and details of organ support (such as mechanical ventilation or dialysis) during the first 24 hours of admission. * Survival status at 30 days.

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine whether early initiation of norepinephrine with rapid dose adjustment improves clinical outcomes in adult patients with septic shock. The study aims to evaluate the effect of early norepinephrine administration on mortality, hemodynamic stabilization, and resuscitation efficiency in adults aged 18 years and older diagnosed with septic shock. The main questions it aims to answer are: * Does early norepinephrine administration with rapid dose titration reduce 28-day mortality compared with standard treatment? * Does early norepinephrine administration with rapid dose tiration lead to faster shock control and reduced fluid requirements without increasing treatment-related adverse events? Researchers will compare early norepinephrine administration with rapid dose adjustment to placebo with standard sequential resuscitation and rescue norepinephrine as needed to see if early vasopressor initiation improves survival, shock resolution, and safety outcomes. Participants will: * Receive either norepinephrine or placebo infusion initiated within one hour of septic shock diagnosis, with dose adjustment every 15 minutes according to a standardized protocol * Undergo close hemodynamic and safety monitoring, including frequent vital sign assessment and limb perfusion evaluation * Receive standard sepsis care, including fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, and organ support as clinically indicated * Be followed for clinical outcomes and adverse events for up to 28 days after enrollment