Simulation in Training Center

2

Review clinical trials related to Simulation in Training Center. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Not yet recruiting

Effect of Anesthesia Equipment Position on Anesthesiologists' Performance

The purpose of this study is to determine if the position of the anesthesia machine affects the ability of anesthesiologists to manage a crisis situation and perform critical tasks. Participants will be asked to manage a simulated crisis situation using a manikin in the operating room. The anesthesia machine will be positioned either in an "optimal" or "awkward" manner for the anesthesiologist. The session will be video recorded and then analysed for various outcomes that reflect the anesthesiologist's performance. Participants will also perform a critical task, bag-valve-mask ventilation, on a manikin with the anesthesia machine in the optimal and awkward positions. The effectiveness of ventilation in each position will be compared. The results of this study may have implications for patient safety.

Participants needed: 60
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: The Hospital for Sick ChildrenUpdated: Apr 9, 2026
Eligibility criteria

All Department of Anesthesia residents (PGY4 or 5), fellows and staff are eligib...

Unwillingness to complete the simulated crisis and complete study questionnaires

Status: Not yet recruiting

Evaluating the Impact of In-Situ Simulation on Interprofessional Healthcare Team Training

Clinical simulation has established itself as an essential methodology in healthcare training, enabling the development of technical and non-technical skills in controlled and safe environments. This study proposes a randomized trial that compares the impact of two learning contexts-a simulation center and the in situ simulation (ISS) environment in the operating room-on the training of interprofessional teams. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of each context in the acquisition and performance of technical and non-technical skills, as well as participants' perceptions of realism, teamwork, and patient safety. The randomized experimental design reinforces the methodological rigor and internal validity of the results, allowing the identification of important differences between the two approaches. The scarcity of studies on interprofessional simulation in a real clinical context underscores the relevance of this research, which may provide scientific evidence to guide training policies and promote safer, more collaborative practices. It is expected that the results will contribute to improving interprofessional training programs and supporting the systematic integration of ISS in the healthcare field, especially in high-complexity environments.

Participants needed: 108
Trial details
Age: 18+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Universidade do PortoUpdated: Jan 16, 2026Locations: 2
Eligibility criteria

Professionals working in the surgical center of ULSM-HPH with at least 6 months... [+1]

Professionals who do not work in the surgical center. [+2]