PCI With GDMT Versus GDMT Alone for Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Reduced LVEF
To evaluate whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) combined with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), compared to GDMT alone, reduces the time to first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during a median follow-up of at least 24 months, measured at the time the last enrolled patient reaches 12 months, in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. MACE is a composite of cardiovascular \[CV\] death, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF) related rehospitalization, heart transplantation, requirement for durable left ventricular assist device \[LVAD\] implantation, or worsening heart failure treated as an out-patient requiring treatment with intravenous medications.
Age ≥18 years at screening. [+5]
Class III or IV angina requiring revascularization. [+13]