Stent Restenosis

Although advances in drug-eluting stents (DES) have substantially reduced the risk of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR) and the need for target lesion revascularisation (TLR), ISR persists. There are several treatment options for ISR (conventional balloon angioplasty, cutting or scoring balloons, drug-coated balloons, repeat DES implantation or bypass surgery). Coronary imaging is mandatory to perform PCI on ISR. Optimal coherence tomography (OCT) is an excellent option to guide PCI, but its role in ISR-PCI remains unclear. The INSIDE OCT Trial aims to compare the acute performance of PCI for ISR, either guided by OCT and angiography or by angiography alone.

This clinical trial aims to compare non-invasive photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) with invasive intravascular imaging (IVI) for post-interventional follow-up in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Participants will undergo post-interventional follow-up using both PCD-CT and coronary angiography with IVI. Researchers will test qualitative and quantitative PCD-CT results for non-inferiority to IVI regarding stent evaluation and detection of in-stent restenosis and plaque morphology.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation has become the dominant treatment strategy for patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization. Nonetheless, PCI with stent implantation has some limitations and especially patients with severely calcified coronary lesions (approximately 10-20% of all patients with CAD) have an elevated risk for adverse outcomes, including target lesion failure (TLF) and stent thrombosis (ST). Several dedicated PCI devices have been developed for treatment of severely calcified lesions. Whereas especially two of them have shown promising results in smaller, prospective studies. First, the super high-pressure NC PCI balloon (OPN™ NC, SIS Medical AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland) has been shown to represent an effective and safe device for lesion preparation. Second, the lately introduced Shockwave intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)™ balloon catheter (Shockwave Medical, Santa Clara, CA, USA) appears to be a safe and efficient alternative device for treatment of calcified coronary lesions. However, it remains unknown, if the OPN™ NC balloon is non-inferior to to IVL regarding lesion preparation and completeness of stent expansion in severely calcified lesions.

Intrastent restenosis is a common complication after intracranial and extracranial arterial stenting and an important cause of recurrent ischemic stroke. Studies have shown that Tongxinluo capsule can protect the injured inner cells, reduce inflammation, inhibit the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells, inhibit the proliferation of plaque and nourish blood vessels, and resist arteriosclerosis. This study was a multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants with intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic stenosis who successfully underwent arterial stenting were included in the study, and were divided into Tongxinluo test group and control group. Clinical and related auxiliary examination data were collected at each follow-up point. To explore the effectiveness and potential mechanism of Tongxinluo capsule in preventing and treating restenosis after intracranial and external arterial stenting, and to provide reference for expanding clinical use of traditional Chinese medicine.

Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is often caused by narrowings in the arteries providing blood to the intestines. Endovascular stent placement is considered the preferred treatment for this condition. Guidelines increasingly support the use of so called covered stents (CS) in stead of bare stents (BMS) for this use but the level of evidence for this is limited. Using CS incur additional costs for healthcare short-term but may prevent recurrence of narrowing and symptoms postoperatively benefitting patients and healthcare. Study Objective: To evaluate the outcomes after stenting of mesenteric arteries using BMS or CS. Study Outcome: Primary stent patency 1 year after placement The trial will also evaluate complications, how often stents need to be reoperated, Quality of Life (QoL) and reasons for subjects death Method: This is a so called prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing CS vs. BMS. This means that one patients have agrred to treatment they will be randomly selected for treatment with either CS or BMS . The stent metal structure is identical in the two implants and the only difference is the graft covering, making this study unique. The study will also collect blood samples for a biobank that will be used to study markers of disease and how these effect treatment outcomes. All patients referred to the Department of Vascular Surgery due to CMI are considered for inclusion if they havechronic symptoms consistent with CMI, significant stenosis or occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery and are \> 18 years Subjects not able to provide informed consent or who have non atherosclerotic cause of CMI, signs of acute loss of blood flow to the intestines cannot participate. Previous stent treatment in the superior mesenteric artery, pregnancy, allergies to contrast or stent materials are also reasons for not being included in this trial. Side effects, risks and disadvantages for participants The risk for procedure-related complications is less than 5% and similar in both study groups. Most short-term complications are related to vascular access sites and consist of local bleeding and thrombosis. Other potential complications include impaired renal function due to contrast use, contrast allergy, arterial dissection and death.