Stone, Urinary

This multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial compares FANS-assisted flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) with suction-assisted mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) for the treatment of renal stones measuring 2-3 cm. A total of 280 patients will be enrolled across nine tertiary centers and randomized 1:1 to either technique. The primary endpoint is stone-free rate (SFR) at 1 month, assessed by non-contrast CT. Secondary outcomes include operative time, intraoperative complications, postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo), pain scores, hospital stay, reinterventions, and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). The study aims to provide the first high-quality head-to-head evidence comparing these two modern suction-enhanced technologies, with the goal of defining the optimal minimally invasive approach for medium-sized renal stones.

This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of two modern, minimally invasive surgical techniques for the removal of kidney stones: Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini-PCNL) and Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) with Flexible and navigable suction sheath The primary objective is to determine which procedure results in a higher stone-free rate, as measured by post-operative imaging. Secondary objectives include comparing operative time, hospitalization length andcomplication rates between the two treatment groups. Patients with two to three centimeter kidney stones who are candidates for either procedure will be randomly assigned to undergo either Mini-PCNL or suctioning FURS. The outcomes will be critically assessed to help establish a higher level of evidence for guiding surgical management of kidney stones.