Thrombolysis

This study evaluates whether early administration of low-dose aspirin (100mg) at 2 hours post-intravenous thrombolysis, compared to the standard timing of 24 hours, improves functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Intravenous thrombolysis is effective for very early treatment of acute ischemic stroke. However, current guidelines recommend starting antiplatelet therapy 24 hours after thrombolysis to avoid symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), a recommendation not based on prospective clinical studies. Early re-occlusion of recanalized arteries due to platelet aggregation occurs in 14-34% of cases and is associated with poor prognosis. The average incidence of SICH is 2.4%, with fatal SICH occurring in only 0.28%. Thus, the impact of re-occlusion on poor prognosis may outweigh the risk of SICH. In this prospective, randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint evaluation, participants are assigned to receive aspirin 100mg either at 2 hours (early group) or at 24 hours (standard group) after thrombolysis. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 3 months. Safety outcomes include the incidence of SICH and all-cause mortality at 3 months. This study will provide clinical evidence regarding the optimal timing for initiating antiplatelet therapy after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

This study is a Phase II, exploratory, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial with blinded endpoint assessment setting on the safety of an adjusted versus a conventional blood pressure management strategy during intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients, with a key focus on the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

Rationale and Relevance: Branch Atheromatous Disease (BAD) describes an atherosclerotic occlusion of one of the deep penetrating cerebral arteries, including the lenticulostriate artery (LSA), paramedian pontine artery (PPA), and anterior choroidal artery (ACHA). BAD is frequently associated with early neurological deterioration (END), particularly progressive motor deficits that contribute to increased disability. Despite its clinical relevance, BAD remains underrepresented in major radiomorphological classification systems such as TOAST, which has led to limited evidence and unclear treatment strategies. Previous studies suggest that the efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) may be reduced in BAD compared to other stroke etiologies. Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVT compared with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with BAD-related stroke. A secondary objective is to examine the impact of acute-phase blood pressure fluctuations on END and functional neurological outcomes. Design and Methods: This international multicenter study will be conducted retrospectively according to the STROBE guidelines. Eligible patients include those with BAD-related stroke treated at one of the participating centers between 2010 and 2025. Inclusion criteria comprise characteristic diffusion-weighted MRI patterns in predefined vascular territories (LSA, PPA, ACHA) and a symptom onset ≤24 hours before admission. Patients with typical lacunar infarcts or with other identified stroke etiologies will be excluded. Endpoints: Primary endpoints include functional outcome at three months, defined as a favorable outcome with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1; occurrence of END, defined as a ≥4-point worsening on the NIHSS within 24-48 hours; and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Collected data include clinical, imaging, and therapeutic variables, as well as blood pressure trajectories and pre-stroke treatments (as detailed in the study protocol). Statistical Analysis: Analyses will be performed using SPSS and R. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and multivariable models (IPTW and Poisson regression) will be applied. Results will be reported as adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals. Significance: This study will provide the first comprehensive evaluation of IVT versus SAPT/DAPT in BAD-related stroke, and will investigate the clinical impact of blood pressure changes in this specific stroke subtype. The findings aim to support evidence-based treatment recommendations for a currently underrecognized and poorly understood stroke etiology.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if tenectplase works to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with onset 4.5-9 hours. It will also learn about the safety of tenectplase in AIS with onset 4.5-9 hours. The main question it aims to answer is: Does tenectplase improve the 90-days functional outcome in participants with acute large vessel occlusion? Researchers will compare tenectplase thrombolysis to non-use to see if tenectplase works to improve the functional outcome in participants with onset 4.5-9 hours. Participants will:\* Receive 0.25mg/kg (max 25mg) tenectplase at admission (after randomization) .\* Receive neurological assessment at admission, Day 5-7 or on hospital discharge (whichever earlier). Audio or video of the assessment may be recorded if possible.\* Receive brain CT + CT angiogram + CT perfusion and MRI after randomization, where the CT scan may be repetitive.

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are the standard of care for treating selected patients with acute large-vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). Successful revascularization is strongly correlated with favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, recanalization failure with stent retrieval and contact aspiration has been observed in up to 29% of patients. If primary thrombectomy fails to achieve recanalization, rescue stenting (RS) has proven to be a feasible rescue therapy. Currently, approved evidence-based alternatives for LVOS patients who have failed MT are lacking, but permanent stenting is suggested as a rescue treatment in expert consensus statements. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), typically consisting of clopidogrel and aspirin, is recommended after stent implantation to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis; however, these medications are not suitable in the acute setting, and optimal platelet inhibition strategies remain unclear. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors have intravenous administration, a rapid onset of action, and their effects subside within a few hours after discontinuation. For these reasons, an increasing number of studies have investigated their use in conjunction with primary stenting for acute stroke. Currently, there is no evidence supporting the superiority of any particular antithrombotic strategy, so decisions are guided by clinical judgment. An additional challenge for clinicians arises when IVT is combined with stenting. Stroke guidelines recommend starting antiplatelets 24 hours after IVT and the risk associated with antithrombotic therapy within the first 24 hours after IVT remains uncertain. This is multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with LVOS undergoing mechanical thrombectomy and rescue stenting. The aim of this study is to evaluate real-world antithrombotic strategies in emergency stenting, particularly in patients treated with IVT, and to assess the safety of emergent stenting following intravenous thrombolysis.

Objective: To observe the practical application of the standardized green channel treatment system for stroke in Xi 'an in the real world. Methods: Clinical data and information of patients with acute ischemic stroke who received standardized green channel treatment for stroke were collected, and a multicenter observational clinical study was carried out in the real world to evaluate the prognosis, mortality, incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage, incidence of pneumonia, and recurrence rate of stroke after 90 days.