Transportation of Patients

This study will address the efficacy and safety of Tenecteplase administered in non-endovascular capable center (nECC) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (acLVO) who present in the 4.5- to 24-hour time window before interhospital transfer to an endovascular capable center (ECC) for endovascular treatment (EVT). * Primary objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Tenecteplase administration at a nECC before EVT transfer compared with standard of care * Secondary objective: To evaluate the impact of time from needle-to-arterial puncture on clinical outcomes Patients who meet inclusion criteria will be randomized to Tenecteplase (0.25mg/kg, maximum 25mg) before transfer or standard of care. A single bolus dose should be injected over 5 seconds.

This study looks at where cancer patients treated at Delafontaine Hospital live and how far they have to travel for care. By mapping patients' home addresses (anonymized), the research will show how distance, transportation, and social factors affect access to cancer treatments and support services. The goal is to better understand inequalities in access to care and to improve patient support in the future.

The aim is to establish a nationwide registry for pediatric intensive care transports in Germany. The project aims to describe and analyse the need for, and current practice of, specialised transports. These data could then be used for future demand planning.

The goal of this study is to assess how safe it is for critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to undergo a PET scan. A PET scan is a type of medical imaging used to help determine why a patient is sick. It is similar to a CT scan but involves a small amount of radioactivity to highlight areas of concern in the body. For a PET scan, patients need to be transported from the ICU to the scanning room, which can be risky because ICU patients are often very fragile. After a patient gets the PET scan injection, their body gives off a small amount of radiation for a short time. Because of this, doctors and nurses have to keep some distance to protect themselves. This means they keep an eye out for the patient from a bit further away than normal. This makes the procedure slightly riskier, especially for very sick patients. This study aims to answer the question: Is getting a PET scan riskier for ICU patients than a regular CT scan? All patients in this study will continue to receive their usual critical care. Researchers will closely monitor the scanning process to evaluate its safety. PET scans are already widely used to detect cancer, but new advancements may allow us to use them more often to diagnose infections. Before this can become routine practice, we need to ensure that PET scanning is just as safe as other commonly used imaging techniques. This study will assess all ICU patients undergoing a PET scan-regardless of the reason for the scan-to determine how safe the procedure is in critically ill individuals.