Upper Extremity Impairments

2

Review clinical trials related to Upper Extremity Impairments. Use filters to narrow results by trial status, phase, treatment, biological sex and sponsor.

Condition / disease
Location
Status: Recruiting

Efficacy of Tele-CPASS Compared to In-person CPASS Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery

This study evaluates whether a home-based telerehabilitation program (tele-CPASS) is as effective as an in-person rehabilitation program (CPASS) for improving arm and hand function after stroke. Stroke often leads to long-term difficulty using the affected arm in daily activities, and access to in-person therapy can be limited. This study aims to determine whether therapy delivered remotely can provide similar benefits to standard in-clinic care. Participants who recently experienced a stroke will be randomly assigned to receive 20 hours of upper extremity rehabilitation therapy either in person or through a telehealth platform. Both groups will receive the same type and amount of therapy focused on practicing meaningful, patient-selected daily activities. Participants will complete assessments before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 6 and 12 months to measure recovery of arm function, real-world arm use, and participation in daily life. The results of this study will help determine whether telerehabilitation can improve access to effective stroke recovery interventions while maintaining clinical effectiveness comparable to in-person therapy.

Participants needed: 42
Trial details
Age: 21+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: University of Texas, El PasoUpdated: Jun 22, 2026Locations: 3
Eligibility criteria

Age 21 years or older [+7]

Inability to provide informed consent [+9]

Status: Recruiting

Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation in Stroke Patients - Parameter Optimization

The goal of this research study is to optimize the parameter of Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Stimulation (LIFUS) that is most effective in changing cortical excitability and motor learning skills in patients who suffered a stroke. The researchers hope to answer two questions. * with increasing power, would LIFUS be more effective? * with the same power, what LIFUS timing is the best For Aim 1, the study will compare 8, 4 W/cm\^2 to a zero(sham) stimulation to see if higher power is the better. For Aim 2, the study will compare 500 vs 1000 vs 2000 Hz "timing" to see which one is better.

Participants needed: 24
Trial details
Age: 21+Biological sex: AllType: InterventionalSponsor: Duke UniversityUpdated: Dec 23, 2025Locations: 1
Eligibility criteria

age >=21 years old of any gender or race [+3]

Bilateral strokes (infarcts and/or hematoma) [+8]